If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
"Cub Driver" wrote in message ... t he can't really be a pilot. I mean a true pilot, Ah, now you are defining pilot! Here's what the Boston Globe, which first broke the charges that Bush was AWOL during the last year or so of his Air Guard tour, concluded in an editorial: ******************************************** Those who trained and flew with Bush, until he gave up flying in April 1972, said he was among the best pilots in the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. In the 22-month period between the end of his flight training and his move to Alabama, Bush logged numerous hours of duty, well above the minimum requirements for so-called ''weekend warriors.'' Indeed, in the first four years of his six-year commitment, Bush spent the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, including 18 months in flight school. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, who enlisted in the Army for two years and spent five months in Vietnam, logged only about a month more active service, since he won an early release from service. *********************************************** I conclude that Bush was a pilot and a military man, and that you aren't much of either. Plonk! all the best -- Dan Ford email: Awwwwww, Dan!!! Now you've gone an destroyed his delusion. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
That year I got about $1.40 for each pound sterling.
This year I am getting $1.70 for each pound. 21% not bad. Attaboy Bushie, continue making my day. And you used to get $5, just a generation or so ago. Thing is, the one to thank for your more recent (temporary) fortune is Alan Greenspan. (If you insist on shooting your mouth of, it's best to have a clue ehat you're talking about.) |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
"Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Clinton seemed to be more of a multi-leveled thinker in those situations. Yes, Clinton and Nixon were without doubt our most intelligent presidents at least since Woodrow Wilson. You might want to read THE ILLUSION OF VICTORY: America in World War I, by Thomas Fleming to dispel yourself of that myth about Wilson. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:06:18 -0500 Cub Driver
wrote: t he can't really be a pilot. I mean a true pilot, Ah, now you are defining pilot! My original assertion stands. No "real" pilot would put himself above so many fellow pilots on the most single important day in their history since First Flight. He would have flown to an alternate and drove in allowing GA to fly. Here's what the Boston Globe, which first broke the charges that Bush was AWOL during the last year or so of his Air Guard tour, concluded in an editorial: ******************************************** Those who trained and flew with Bush, until he gave up flying in April One hand washes the other, eh? ".... But Bush was serving in a champagne unit that was refuge for the area sons of privilege. Its ranks included John Conally's son, Lloyd Bentson's son, John Tower's son, SEVEN Dallas Cowboys, and two sons of the businessman who got G W Bush into the Guard ahead of hundreds of others on a waiting list." 1972, said he was among the best pilots in the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. In the 22-month period between the end of his flight training and his move to Alabama, Bush logged numerous hours of duty, well above the minimum requirements for so-called ''weekend warriors.'' Indeed, in the first four years of his six-year commitment, Bush spent the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, including 18 months in flight school. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, who enlisted in the Army for two years and spent five months in Vietnam, logged only about a month more active service, since he won an early release from service. *********************************************** I conclude that Bush was a pilot and a military man, and that you aren't much of either. Most people consider someone that goes AWOL to be a coward. Plonk! Name calling and plonking. So you're out of gas, so to speak. I'll bet you plonk all those that offer opposing views. Nice and tidy, eh? R. Hubbell all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:40:46 -0700 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote:
"Cub Driver" wrote in message ... t he can't really be a pilot. I mean a true pilot, Ah, now you are defining pilot! Here's what the Boston Globe, which first broke the charges that Bush was AWOL during the last year or so of his Air Guard tour, concluded in an editorial: ******************************************** Those who trained and flew with Bush, until he gave up flying in April 1972, said he was among the best pilots in the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. In the 22-month period between the end of his flight training and his move to Alabama, Bush logged numerous hours of duty, well above the minimum requirements for so-called ''weekend warriors.'' Indeed, in the first four years of his six-year commitment, Bush spent the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, including 18 months in flight school. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, who enlisted in the Army for two years and spent five months in Vietnam, logged only about a month more active service, since he won an early release from service. *********************************************** I conclude that Bush was a pilot and a military man, and that you aren't much of either. Plonk! all the best -- Dan Ford email: Awwwwww, Dan!!! Now you've gone an destroyed his delusion. You mean Bush's? I don't think he has. But maybe I have done that to yours and OP? You have my apologies in that case. R. Hubbell |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:50:12 -0600 "Matthew P. Cummings" wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:00:24 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote: You've snipped it out. I don't have the time to search for it. If I remember the context, it was a silly thing to expect from the AOPA. Enough said. Do you think it was silly of AOPA to develop the airport security program? Doesn't matter, they did. Now when something isn't working in it and it's brought to their attention they ignore it. You don't seem to grasp the fact that when their program failed they are not interested in why so that they can improve it before the govt. improves it. Maybe you want the govt. to improve the plan then? That's what's going to happen if AOPA keeps ignoring it. I don't care if you are lazy, you should read a posting before replying to it, or are you just trying ignorant? I did read the posting, in a perfect world all the things we think should happen, would happen. Keep supporting the AOPA, don't get too discouraged if you feel they have failed you in some way. I don't think they have. (notice I included your posting) R. Hubbell |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message news On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:04:22 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote: I got news for you. AOPA is not in charge of enforcing the laws. If the police let the guy go, take it up with the police. Read what I posted. I did not say they didn't enforce the law, I said they should have taken the information down so that they could use it in the future, i.e. when a new stupid law is proposed they can guide it's direction by virtue of having proof of what doesn't work. Must you be contrary with everybody, can't you just read something as it's posted? For you I'll say it again, AOPA SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THE INFORMATION GIVEN FOR THE RECORD, IN THE FUTURE THEY CAN THEN USE IT TO GUIDE THE CREATION OF SOMETHING THAT WORKS. They refused to listen. Why do you want AOPA to take notes for you. It wouldn't be used in court it was all hearsay. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:14:49 -0800, "R. Hubbell"
wrote: But for Dubya the numbers of hours is salient and interesting because ....because you wish to criticize his military service, possibly in the name of providing information to support a theory that he wasn't "really" a military pilot, but traded on it anyway to get office. I'll bet he has very few hours but just enough to say he was a military pilot. But how many as PIC? Maybe his hours were in a TF-102. So? What, fighter jets with guns are the only airplanes that make a pilot a military pilot? Face it: He was a military pilot. Anyone to flies a military trainer solo is a military pilot. And the conceit offends all of the *good* pilots in the Materiel Command. You wish to say those people are also not "real pilots"? Good gravy. Bush has more hours total in a faster and more complex airplane than me, and they call *me* a pilot. He had scads more time in military service than I ever did, and the Air Force gave *me* an honorable discharge, and called me "military" the whole time I was enlisted. Beyond a very thin veneer of partisan political bickering, your case just doesn't stand up. Rob |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
"Cub Driver" wrote in message
... Here's what the Boston Globe, which first broke the charges that Bush was AWOL during the last year or so of his Air Guard tour, concluded in an editorial: ... Indeed, in the first four years of his six-year commitment, Bush spent the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, including 18 months in flight school. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, who enlisted in the Army for two years and spent five months in Vietnam, logged only about a month more active service, since he won an early release from service. Why was the word "only" inserted in that sentence? "Al Gore, who enlisted...logged about a month more active service..." sounds a lot better. I'd have expected more bias from the Globe :-) -- David Brooks |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
SCOTUS has not ruled on the 2nd since the Miller case over 70 years ago. At the time, they ruled that a sawed off shotgun was not protected by the 2nd amendment *because it was not a militarily useful weapon.* SCOTUS? Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1,36 (1998) Muscarello v. United States,524 U.S. 125, 124-125 (1998). Printz v. United States, 521 U.S.___, ___, 117 S.Ct. 2365 (1997). Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266, 307 (1994) .... to name just a few! all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 38 | November 19th 03 04:04 PM |