A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Security in the USA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 17th 05, 03:53 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message
news:_S3ie.3089$DC2.2593@okepread01...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message

In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members

of
Congress was something like 98%.

(Found it)
http://www.thisnation.com/question/016.html


It's been that way since the 1940's.




Everybody thinks Congress is doing a lousy job. The same everybody thinks
that there congress criters hung the moon.


It's all cyclical. Every one thinks government should cut funding for all
the "pet projects" except THEIR "pet projects".


Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO



  #22  
Old May 17th 05, 03:55 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Masino" wrote in message
...
In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members

of
Congress was something like 98%.

It's been that way since the 1940's.


Most people are sheep.

And as I mentioned in my other post:

[It's all cyclical. Every one thinks government should cut funding for all
the "pet projects" except THEIR "pet projects".]



  #23  
Old May 17th 05, 10:29 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike W." wrote in message ...


2) Hope that dumb-ass pilots stop busting aforesaid airspaces so as not to
create even more unnecessary media frenzy about deadly little planes.


Surprising little 'frenzy' about this matter, pretty much closed as far as the mainstream media goes....


  #24  
Old May 17th 05, 10:30 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cockpit Colin" wrote in message ...
I'm curious ...

What do you folks in the USA think the answer to the big "question" is, when
it comes to things like security of the whitehouse?

What's best ...

(a) Increase the radius of the no-fly zones to give greater protection
against faster aircraft?

(b) Leave things the way thay are now and "hope for the best"?

(c) Something else?

Seriously, we've all read many compelling arguments as to how and why the
existing procedures don't work, and tend to "drag down" GA - what I'm
interested in hearing though is not what DOESN'T work, but what DOES.

Any ideas?

Cheers,

CC


Move the White House to the middle of Wyoming?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Group Grades U.S. Aviation Security an 'F' George Patterson Piloting 33 March 13th 05 01:58 PM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
27 Apr 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 April 27th 04 11:54 PM
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements Larry Dighera Piloting 1 February 25th 04 06:11 PM
another "either you are with us ..." story Jeff Franks Piloting 2 December 31st 03 01:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.