Zoom

CJ wrote:
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"Anthony W" wrote in message
news:M3tce.375$7K.98@trnddc06...

Juan Jimenez wrote:


Kinda pointless suing someone who barely has two nickles to rub
together, ain't it?


That's probably the reason no one sues you, ain't it?

It must be hard to type with Zoom's hand up your ass.

Wouldn't know. But you seem to be the expert, why don't you tell us about
it?


Well, this is a classic. An intelligent ****wad would ignore the insult An
average ****wad says, "Wouldn't know...". Juan, connect the dots! Anthony
was insulting you! You graced his insult with, "Wouldn't know". I think I
speak for many hundreds of people who evaluate you as an avergage ****wad on
your best day. Poll?

- cj

His reply didn't make it back to my server. The reason I and the rest
of us here are experts on this, is that we can plainly see the effects
of Zoom's hand up juan's ass.

Tony

"CJ" wrote in message ...

Well, this is a classic. An intelligent ****wad would ignore the insult
An average ****wad says, "Wouldn't know...". Juan, connect the dots!
Anthony was insulting you! You graced his insult with, "Wouldn't know".
I think I speak for many hundreds of people who evaluate you as an
avergage ****wad on your best day. Poll?

What would you know about intelligence? You see, if you were the owner of a
IQ in anything over two digits you'd figure out that 1) Anthony doesn't have
the brainmass to figure out how to put together a decent insult, let alone
one that deserves a response at his level, and 2) there aren't enough people
at your level of idiocy for you to claim that you speak for "hundreds". Now,
it may be the case that you're suffering from multiple personality disorder,
in which case, all I can say is that y'all need help with this personal
problem of yours. Any questions? One at a time, please. rofl

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...

Hmm haven't seen you near my tent either so I guess your "spineless " like
me.
So do you do the toilet thing too??? LOL!!!

How quickly you've forgotten that you don't rate the privilege. Alzheimer's
already? *8)

Spineless Putz ? That's coming from a guy who won't test fly the BD-4 1/2
he built.

Ah, but in my case, ye spineless one, I will have the opportunity to do so,
whereas in your case, you can only wish for the opportunity, because you
will never, ever have the chance to fly something the likes of which I own.
That I can guarantee to you, in writing, stapled to that stripe on your
back. chuckle

In article , Stuart & Kathryn Fields says...

Well Chuck, I assume by your reply that something measurably positive is
being created by all of this bashing?

Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake. It evident to me that you missed the
point of the postings. Did you go to http://www.ousterhout.net/ to get some
background before assuming that there was no positives to all this? Did you do
any Google searches to get a feel for what this is all about or are you just
playing newsgroup censor?

In my opinion zoom is a phony and thru the years he has damaged many peoples
name ,reputation and livihoods, is this OK with you? I would hope not. I'm sure
the 2 companies he just sued at SnF for non payment of unwanted ads wish they
could have been informed before doing business with him. That's the positve
message.


I wish there was as much creative
information about homebuilts here.

There is loads of homebuilt info here and from time to time a zoom thread will
pop up, run a while and stop .No big deal. Maybe you don't realize that most of
the people and companies zoom has hurt are deeply involved in the homebuilt
field. People that he bullied into silence while he had his magazine where he
controlled the content and never ran a letter to the editor from a lot of us
defending our positions. His side was the only one heard for a long time.

Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were zoomed
have a voice. I never knew that there were more then a couple of us who had been
zoomed until I started posting my story on the net. Then the gates opened and
the truth about zoom was opened to the light of day. The list of those who have
been zoomed reads like a "Who's Who in homebuilt aviation" list.



If you look at the relative amount of
postings and the content, the name of the newsgroup might be better called
"Bashing Practice 101"

Maybe from you seemingly uninformed perspective it may seem that way but I
respectfully disagree with your conclusions.


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

"zoom can fool most of the people some of the time ,some of the people none of
the time& jaun all of the time" anon

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...

Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the
posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake.

ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in this
country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or maybe
you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anything you
want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wall
because it feels good when you stop. Who knows.

Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were
zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in
person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Juan

"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
...
Well Chuck, I assume by your reply that something measurably positive is
being created by all of this bashing?

Granted, there is bashing going on, but they are always doing it with the
word zoom in the subject. Simply put that word in your filter, and you
never will have to look at the zoom bashing again.
--
Jim in NC

On Sun, 1 May 2005 19:25:29 -0400, "Juan Jimenez"
wrote:

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...

Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the
posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake.

ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in this
country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or maybe
you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anything you
want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wall
because it feels good when you stop. Who knows.

Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were
zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in
person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Juan



Juan,

Your post has no relevance to what Chuck posted. Chuck made
the point that Jim Campbell had a magazine that he edited
and that he used to attack various people and companys.
However, he NEVER allowed any "letters to the editor"
telling their "side of the story" to be published.

The only way the "rest of the story" could be told was RAH
and the internet. Only here did everyone have the same
ability to post. Jim Campbell soon found out that his lies
and accusations would be found out and exposed for the rest
of the aviation world to see.

It's documented that he said he flew rescue missions in
Ethopia... He did not

It's documented that he said he fathered a child .... He did
not

It's documented that he represented himself as a Medical
Doctor.... He is not

It appears that Jim Campbell hasn't changed any...

In that light, it's pretty obvious that RAH is the only menu
available for the truth to come out about Jim Campbell.

Do you have any suggestions as to a better means to exposing
Jim Campbells past and current actions??

Actually, John Ousterhout's website does quite a good job of
it and I highly recommend anyone even thinking of believing
what Jim Campbell says to check it out thoroughly....

http://www.ousterhout.net/

In article ,
says...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in messag
e
...

Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of
the
posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake.

ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in t
his
country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or may
be
you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anythi
ng you
want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wal
l
because it feels good when you stop. Who knows.

Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who wer
e
zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in

person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Juan


You must have conviently missed those pictures of Chuck confronting
Zoom and then Zoom being escorted out of Sun N Fun that recently were
referenced on this list

sleepy6 wrote:

In article ,
says...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in messag
e
...

Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of

the

posts
is to instruct not bash for bashing sake.

ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in t
his
country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or may
be
you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anythi
ng you
want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wal
l
because it feels good when you stop. Who knows.


Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who wer

e

zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in

person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Juan



You must have conviently missed those pictures of Chuck confronting
Zoom and then Zoom being escorted out of Sun N Fun that recently were
referenced on this list


Obviously you misunderstood what those pictures actually represent. It
seems there was an expected civil disturbance at the local Hardee's and
the police went to SnF to ask zoom's advice where upon he offered to go
take charge of the situation. The fact that no such disturbance ensued
is proof that, once again, zoom is an indespensible asset to the community.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In article , Juan Jimenez says...

Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were
zoomed
have a voice.

And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in
person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive
mentality...

Seems you have me mixed up with your hero.He sends you to do his dirty work
for him since he lacks the courage of his convictions to speak for himself..Did
he or did he not sue 2 ex advertizers on the 15 of April? I bet your proud of
that .Not rocks just facts,something you don't understand FACTS.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret