If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Japanese Army Navy
"JDupre5762" wrote in message ... Did the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force and the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force operate any of the same make of aircraft? It seems to me that that at least with some combat aircraft the two services might have economically ordered from the same production lines and saved some money and opened up some factories for producing more of other types of aircraft? Well, there was the Zero for one. -- Et qui rit des cures d'Oc? De Meuse raines, houp! de cloques. De quelles loques ce turqe coin. Et ne d'anes ni rennes, Ecuries des cures d'Oc. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"JDupre5762" wrote in message ... Did the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force and the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force operate any of the same make of aircraft? It seems to me that that at least with some combat aircraft the two services might have economically ordered from the same production lines and saved some money and opened up some factories for producing more of other types of aircraft? John Dupre' The IJN and the Japanese Army were deadly rivals in the power struggles that characterised Japanese politcs of the 20's, 30's and 40's its unlikley they would ever co-operate on anything. That said the requirements of shipborne aircraft tend to vary from those of land based aircraft and the USN and USAAF used different aircraft too as did the RAF and FAA. Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The IJN and the Japanese Army were deadly rivals in the power struggles that characterised Japanese politcs of the 20's, 30's and 40's its unlikley they would ever co-operate on anything. Hi Keith The J.N.A.F. and J.A.A.F. did in fact co-operate out of necessity. The Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui (Rigorous Sword) short-range interceptor was a prime example. The rocket propelled aircraft was based broadly on the Messerschmitt Me-163B Komet design, as the Japanese only had one simple instruction manual to use as a guide. The J.A.A.F. recieved a samll number of MXY7 Akigusa (Autumn Grass) gliders that had been built by the Maeda Koku Kenkyusho company to be used as trainers for the J8M1. The J.A.A.F. designation for their development of the J8M1 was Ki.200. After the Army Aero-Technical Research Institue (Rikugan Kokugijutsu Kenkyujo)got involved, it was developed as the Ki.202. There were five prototypes of the J8M1 built, but only the first one built flew. It made its maiden flight at Yokosuka Naval Aeronautical Engineering Arsenal on the 7th of July 1945. It crashed after reaching an altitude of 1,300 feet in a steep climb. It was determined that the accident was a result of the rocket motor failing. The hydrogen peroxide shifted to the rear of the partially empty tank which in turn cut off the fuel supply, and owing to air entering a fuel pipe and causing a blockage. Although the J.A.A.F. chose the aircraft as the priority interceptor project, no prototype was completed by the time Japan surrendered. Cheers...Chris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"av8r" wrote in message ... The IJN and the Japanese Army were deadly rivals in the power struggles that characterised Japanese politcs of the 20's, 30's and 40's its unlikley they would ever co-operate on anything. Hi Keith The J.N.A.F. and J.A.A.F. did in fact co-operate out of necessity. The Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui (Rigorous Sword) short-range interceptor was a prime example. The rocket propelled aircraft was based broadly on the Messerschmitt Me-163B Komet design, as the Japanese only had one simple instruction manual to use as a guide. The J.A.A.F. recieved a samll number of MXY7 Akigusa (Autumn Grass) gliders that had been built by the Maeda Koku Kenkyusho company to be used as trainers for the J8M1. The J.A.A.F. designation for their development of the J8M1 was Ki.200. After the Army Aero-Technical Research Institue (Rikugan Kokugijutsu Kenkyujo)got involved, it was developed as the Ki.202. There were five prototypes of the J8M1 built, but only the first one built flew. It made its maiden flight at Yokosuka Naval Aeronautical Engineering Arsenal on the 7th of July 1945. It crashed after reaching an altitude of 1,300 feet in a steep climb. It was determined that the accident was a result of the rocket motor failing. The hydrogen peroxide shifted to the rear of the partially empty tank which in turn cut off the fuel supply, and owing to air entering a fuel pipe and causing a blockage. Although the J.A.A.F. chose the aircraft as the priority interceptor project, no prototype was completed by the time Japan surrendered. Cheers...Chris Right but that was at the end of the war when all else had failed for most of the time they were deadly rivals. Yamamoto had to be sent back to sea in 1941 to avoid assassination by the army ! Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Keith
I realize this was a last ditch effort but it counters your claim that they did not co-operate on anything. Cheers...Chris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"av8r" wrote in message ... Hi Keith I realize this was a last ditch effort but it counters your claim that they did not co-operate on anything. Cheers...Chris There are exceptions to every rule. Keith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"JDupre5762" wrote in message ... Did the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force and the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force operate any of the same make of aircraft? It seems to me that that at least with some combat aircraft the two services might have economically ordered from the same production lines and saved some money and opened up some factories for producing more of other types of aircraft? John Dupre' The IJN and the Japanese Army were deadly rivals in the power struggles that characterised Japanese politcs of the 20's, 30's and 40's its unlikley they would ever co-operate on anything. That said the requirements of shipborne aircraft tend to vary from those of land based aircraft and the USN and USAAF used different aircraft too as did the RAF and FAA. Keith "Deadly rivals"? Did the Army and IJN do assassinations on each other or something? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Eric Moore" wrote in message
om "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "JDupre5762" wrote in message ... Did the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force and the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force operate any of the same make of aircraft? It seems to me that that at least with some combat aircraft the two services might have economically ordered from the same production lines and saved some money and opened up some factories for producing more of other types of aircraft? John Dupre' The IJN and the Japanese Army were deadly rivals in the power struggles that characterised Japanese politcs of the 20's, 30's and 40's its unlikley they would ever co-operate on anything. That said the requirements of shipborne aircraft tend to vary from those of land based aircraft and the USN and USAAF used different aircraft too as did the RAF and FAA. Keith "Deadly rivals"? Did the Army and IJN do assassinations on each other or something? Something fairly close to it. Right-wing Japanese nationalists aligned with parts of the Imperial Japanese Army had been using assasination and threats of violence against political leaders thoughout the 1930s. In roughly 1940-41, Admiral Yamamoto was rumored to be a target of assasination efforts for arguing against war with the United States. In some versions of the story, that's how he ended up in command of the Japanese fleet in December 1941; his bosses decided he was safer at sea than in a Tokyo office. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Something fairly close to it. Right-wing Japanese nationalists aligned with parts of the Imperial Japanese Army had been using assasination and threats of violence against political leaders thoughout the 1930s. In roughly 1940-41, Admiral Yamamoto was rumored to be a target of assasination efforts for arguing against war with the United States. In some versions of the story, that's how he ended up in command of the Japanese fleet in December 1941; his bosses decided he was safer at sea than in a Tokyo office. To be precise. safer on the Battleship Yamato, which he used as his HQ -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Leadfoot" wrote in message news:qHOUa.18168$u51.6146@fed1read05... Something fairly close to it. Right-wing Japanese nationalists aligned with parts of the Imperial Japanese Army had been using assasination and threats of violence against political leaders thoughout the 1930s. In roughly 1940-41, Admiral Yamamoto was rumored to be a target of assasination efforts for arguing against war with the United States. In some versions of the story, that's how he ended up in command of the Japanese fleet in December 1941; his bosses decided he was safer at sea than in a Tokyo office. To be precise. safer on the Battleship Yamato, which he used as his HQ IRC his first flagship on returning to sea was the Nagato as the Yamato was still fitting out. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTD: ANC Manual (Army Navy Civil) for Air Traffic Control | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 20th 04 04:06 AM |
WTB: ANC Manual (Army Navy Civil) air traffic~1950's?(correctedpost) | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 27th 04 08:13 AM |
WTB: ANC Manual (Army Navy Civil) Air Traffic Control - 1950's? | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 25th 04 07:03 AM |
Army Aircraft Operator Manuals | TJ | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 13th 04 03:45 AM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |