A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

c182 fuel burn



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 04, 02:21 PM
Rob Timmerman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default c182 fuel burn

Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT


  #2  
Old July 5th 04, 02:30 PM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Rob Timmerman wrote:
Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT



The 182 (1963 C model I think) in the Bay Area Aero Club bills its
members at a wet rate based on a 13 Gpm fuel burn. This burn rate is
based on actual usage and is surveryed quarterly. I cant account for how
much of this is training (and richer mixtures) versus XC (and hopefully
leaner mixtures). The aircraft has been in the club for about 2 years,
and newsletters may show some variation in the fuel burn.

All may be found at www.bayareaaeroclub.org

Dave

  #3  
Old July 5th 04, 02:45 PM
Aaron Coolidge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rob Timmerman wrote:
: Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
: with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
: with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
: Thanks, RT

Rule of thumb for piston engines: divide rated HP by 18 to get cruise
fuel flow. Assumes about 75% power and proper leaning.
IE, 230 HP is about 12.7 gal/hr.
--
Aaron Coolidge

  #4  
Old July 5th 04, 03:19 PM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is that 13 gph based on tach or hobbs?


"Dave S" wrote in message
ink.net...


Rob Timmerman wrote:
Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older

c182
with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT



The 182 (1963 C model I think) in the Bay Area Aero Club bills its
members at a wet rate based on a 13 Gpm fuel burn. This burn rate is
based on actual usage and is surveryed quarterly. I cant account for how
much of this is training (and richer mixtures) versus XC (and hopefully
leaner mixtures). The aircraft has been in the club for about 2 years,
and newsletters may show some variation in the fuel burn.

All may be found at www.bayareaaeroclub.org

Dave



  #5  
Old July 5th 04, 04:22 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Depends entirely on how hard you run the engine. I prefer 20" and 2300 RPM
(makes for a very smooth ride) and get just under 11 gph by the clock.

Jim



"Rob Timmerman"
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
-with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
-with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
-Thanks, RT
-

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
  #6  
Old July 5th 04, 05:02 PM
Mike Adams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote:

Depends entirely on how hard you run the engine. I prefer 20" and
2300 RPM (makes for a very smooth ride) and get just under 11 gph by
the clock.

Jim



"Rob Timmerman"
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical
older c182 -with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to
do a comparison -with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the
C182. -Thanks, RT
-

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com


My experience is consistent with this. I've been keeping track of fuel burn
for the last 2 years since getting the airplane (a '67 but with the O470-U
engine), and my average is 11.3 per tach hour. Most of my cross-country
flights are at relatively high altitudes (10 to 12K) where MP is down to 19
to 20 inches at WOT.

Mike
  #7  
Old July 5th 04, 05:55 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rob Timmerman wrote:

Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT



My 67 burned between 11.5 and 13 depending on how hard I was pushing it.
I typically ran 22 square at 6-8,000 feet.


Matt

  #8  
Old July 5th 04, 09:29 PM
Bob Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FWIW
180 hp M20C (carb'ed) run 600 hrs mostly x-c at 75% 9.5-10 gph cruise
trips of 1.5-2.5 hours typical
Flight Fuel Flow average 9.1 gph (total fuel / flt time) as measured
by Garmin 196
Tach Fuel Flow average 8.5 gph (total fuel / total tach)as measured by
Horizon electronic tach
No Hobbes to compare
YMMV



Rule of thumb for piston engines: divide rated HP by 18 to get cruise
fuel flow. Assumes about 75% power and proper leaning.
IE, 230 HP is about 12.7 gal/hr.

  #9  
Old July 5th 04, 10:15 PM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hobbs.. Good question and sorry I didnt specify earlier. Maybe it wasnt
much in the way of good info after all.

Dave

Dude wrote:

Is that 13 gph based on tach or hobbs?


"Dave S" wrote in message
ink.net...


Rob Timmerman wrote:

Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older


c182

with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT



The 182 (1963 C model I think) in the Bay Area Aero Club bills its
members at a wet rate based on a 13 Gpm fuel burn. This burn rate is
based on actual usage and is surveryed quarterly. I cant account for how
much of this is training (and richer mixtures) versus XC (and hopefully
leaner mixtures). The aircraft has been in the club for about 2 years,
and newsletters may show some variation in the fuel burn.

All may be found at www.bayareaaeroclub.org

Dave





  #10  
Old July 6th 04, 12:38 AM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:21:31 -0400, Rob Timmerman wrote:

Can someone tell me what the fuel burn numbers are on a typical older c182
with the Continental 230hp carbed engine. I am trying to do a comparison
with a Cherokee 6/300 and can't find numbers for the C182.
Thanks, RT


http://www.risingup.com/planespecs/i...plane268.shtml

I'm not sure that's the right one, but look around. You might find what
you're looking for.

Greg

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
spaceship one Pianome Home Built 169 June 30th 04 05:47 AM
Repairing Plastic Instrument Panel Overlay Jeff P Owning 22 January 29th 04 06:42 PM
Yo! Fuel Tank! Veeduber Home Built 15 October 25th 03 02:57 AM
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump Greg Reid Home Built 15 October 7th 03 07:09 PM
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 161 September 25th 03 07:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.