If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
This is the guy who castigated someone on the board who said he didn't
bother getting a medical or do a BFR. Hey Skylune, you probably think your hacking is simply harmless fun, right? What a putz. (Putzlune would be a better moniker you dolt/Emery-Riddle washout.) "Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... Read the "Fuel Price Affect" (sic) posted on the AOPA member board (easy to hack into their site if you are not a member; I-pilot is a bit tougher, but doable): Rising AV gas prices are definitely having an "affect." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Orville: What percentage of boaters use Coast Guard Services vs.
percentage of flyers using FAA funded services (including the airports themselves, controllers, etc.)? How much of an operating subsidy and capital subsidy do private marinas receive? Why does the AOPA cry about "privatization" and "user fees" while the Boat US has no such issues? By the way, your red plane is butt ugly. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article
outaviation.com, "Skylune" (a pathetic excuse for a human being) tried (and failed) to make a point: Orville: What percentage of boaters use Coast Guard Services vs. percentage of flyers using FAA funded services (including the airports themselves, controllers, etc.)? How much of an operating subsidy and capital subsidy do private marinas receive? Plenty -- The Corps of Engineers keeps the harbors dredged; bridges have to be raised/lowered for yachtsmen (such as "Skyloon") (or is he a stinkpot driver?). They also require police to kep security, fire services -- all paid by the taxpayers. Don't come whining to ME about "subsidies"! Why does the AOPA cry about "privatization" and "user fees" while the Boat US has no such issues? Because the boaters haven't been threatened (yet). By the way, your red plane is butt ugly. I can tell that "Skyloon" probably have far better taste than your wife (or girlfriend/boyfriend), but have absolutely NO appreciation for good airplanes. (The fool doesn't know how to spell my name, either.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Skylune" wrote:
Orville: What percentage of boaters use Coast Guard Services vs. percentage of flyers using FAA funded services (including the airports themselves, controllers, etc.)? How much of an operating subsidy and capital subsidy do private marinas receive? How many lakes, rivers, reservoirs, other bodies of water were created, altered, maintained by the Corp of Engineers for the purpose of recreational boating as a primary or tertiary reasons? How much does the Corp spend each year to maintain those bodies of water? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
gonline.com... wrote: The slow death of GA is in acceleration in the NY area. I believe you're missing the smaller picture. TEB has been *small* GA unfriendly for quite some time now. It's all about money: which makes more for the FBO, a 4 172s or 1 citation? Right now, MMU is pretty good about small GA. But I predict that this won't last long. The best break we "little plane" pilots got in a while in this I wouldn't call a $35.00 landing/parking/handling fee by Signature the only FBO small GA friendly |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Steve S wrote:
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message gonline.com... wrote: The slow death of GA is in acceleration in the NY area. I believe you're missing the smaller picture. TEB has been *small* GA unfriendly for quite some time now. It's all about money: which makes more for the FBO, a 4 172s or 1 citation? Right now, MMU is pretty good about small GA. But I predict that this won't last long. The best break we "little plane" pilots got in a while in this I wouldn't call a $35.00 landing/parking/handling fee by Signature the only FBO small GA friendly Agreed. A reasonable overnight parking fee ($10 a night ?) I could go along with but $35 will pretty much guarantee a lot of GA aircraft will avoid that FBO. In their own way they are contributing to the extermination of general aviation. Just as with excessive income taxes, there is a point of diminishing returns. There somes a point where reducing tax rates actually results in an overall increase in tax revenues because people start increasing economic activities. I think some of these FBOs need a little dose of supply side economic thinking. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
kontiki wrote:
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message I wouldn't call a $35.00 landing/parking/handling fee by Signature the only FBO small GA friendly Is $35 really unfriendly in the NYC metro area? I haven't lived in the area for almost 10 years but even then it cost over $20 to park a car for the day in prime midtown spot. Why would it not cost the same or more to park an aircraft? Agreed. A reasonable overnight parking fee ($10 a night ?) I could go along with but $35 will pretty much guarantee a lot of GA aircraft will avoid that FBO. In their own way they are contributing to the extermination of general aviation. I expect to pay $10 a night almost anywhere. Often it's less. But at prime locations I'm sometimes surprised at how little we pay... and how much we complain. I'd like use of all airports to be free too. I hate getting charged parking and service and whatever. Although with the increased security that 9/11 caused, I feel like I get a little more for the dollar. But I'm willing to pay to get access, security, and service. I'm glad someone is there to provide it and I have to be willing to pay for it. It shouldn't work the way it worked for me this weekend. I filled up at our private tank, then flew to our local Class C airport to pick up my passenger. The FBO generously provided a car and driver to do the round trip to the passenger terminal. No charge but I tipped the driver. We returned and flew to a busy Class B. There were a number of smaller airports nearby but none as close to our downtown hotel as the this one. We tookour tail dragger directly to the overnight parking area knowing that it can't be towed. We were met by 2 golf carts for luggage and the trip to the FBO. We checked in, ate a cookie, met our host, and off we went. We stayed an extra day. Returned, told the receptionist that we needed a ride out to our plane because it couldn't be towed but otherwise didn't need anything else. "Fine, have a nice flight". Three different guys helped us get our luggage out to the plane. No charge. I'm embarrassed by that. I know that they have charges for overnight parking and service in lieu of a fuel purchase. But I didn't offer and they didn't ask. It shouldn't work that way but often than not, it does. (Taildragger helps). How do these guys stay in business? I know my $35 isn't going to make or break the business but how many businesses provide great, on-demand service and don't bother to collect anything? Maybe I'll invest that $35 in a new ANR headset to stimulate the economy. No, actually I returned home and filled up again at the private tank with the $35 I didn't pay the FBO. Great for me! Just as with excessive income taxes, there is a point of diminishing returns. There somes a point where reducing tax rates actually results in an overall increase in tax revenues because people start increasing economic activities. I think some of these FBOs need a little dose of supply side economic thinking. It was BS then, it's BS now. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe I look at it strangely?
When you pay to park your car in a parking lot is it on private property? When you pay to park your plane is it on private property? My take on it is, if it is being (car or plane) parked on public property funded by taxpayers it has already been paid for. Heck I hate toll roads! Now if a private company wants to build a road and charge a toll , fine. When tax dollars pay for the construction it just really gets my goat. I don't mind some sort of tax, but I hate being "double" taxed . I just do not see taxes funding airports and then the airport turning around charging someone a landing fee or what have you , when the Federal tax dollar supports the airport. If the airport wants to charge for it's use, then it needs to be a private airport and not publicly funded. IMHO, a 2 buck charge at a funded airport is 2 bucks to much . Is it just me or does anyone else feel they are being ripped off when airports do this? Seems to me they could do more biz by not having landing and parking fees. More pilots would stop there and use their services wouldn't they? I think the fees just add to the slow death of GA in an area. Patrick student SP aircraft structural mech "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message I wouldn't call a $35.00 landing/parking/handling fee by Signature the only FBO small GA friendly Is $35 really unfriendly in the NYC metro area? I haven't lived in the area for almost 10 years but even then it cost over $20 to park a car for the day in prime midtown spot. Why would it not cost the same or more to park an aircraft? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Steve S wrote:
I wouldn't call a $35.00 landing/parking/handling fee by Signature the only FBO small GA friendly Oh. Well. I'm out of date again, then. I thought a new school/FBO had opened there a couple of years ago ("Blue" something?). - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death toll now 10 times 9/11 | X98 | Military Aviation | 9 | June 11th 04 05:23 AM |
~ US JOINS CHINA & IRAN AS TOP DEATH PENALTY USERS ~ | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | April 8th 04 02:55 PM |
About death threats and other Usenet potpourri :-) | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 4 | December 23rd 03 07:16 AM |
"Air Force rules out death in spy case" | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 5 | November 10th 03 07:24 AM |