If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Craig,
The geometry of the fuel tanks and the locations of the fuel ports in the tanks cause the actual amount of usable fuel in each tank to vary depending on aircraft attitude. By way of example, let's say that you've only got 5 gallons in the right tank, and the wind conditions on landing require a pronounced slip with a bank to the right. If the fuel port is inboard and all the fuel goes sloshing outboard, and only the right tank is selected, you've just starved your engine of fuel. But as long as you have some fuel in both tanks and Both selected, you ought to be fine even in a prolonged uncoordinated condition. 1. Is the fuel port inboard on the C172? 2. Does selecting "both" draw fuel from both tanks, even if one is empty? The only time that fuel is set to one particular tank is on the ground. I've never used fuel from only one tank in flight. Why would someone do that? Cessnas have the notorious characteristic of not drawing fuel evenly from both tanks in the Both position. This can result in fuel imbalance. In a Cessna 172 you might never notice any difference in the flight characteristics, but in a 182 which has more fuel capacity in each wing than the 172 has in total, you can develop an imbalance which becomes fairly uncomfortable. By selecting one tank or the other, you can burn fuel (mostly) from the full tank in order to reestablish lateral balance. Read your autopilot limitations carefully as well. My POH prohibits operation of the autopilot when fuel imbalance exceeds 90 lbs. That's only a 15 gallon difference between left and right, so I try to stay ahead of the situation. Why does is operation of the A/P prohibited when there is a fuel imbalance? Also, why is the fuel selector set to one tank during refueling? Is it to minimize crossfeeding? If you're parked not quite level, and start refueling with the fuel selector in the Both postion, if you start by topping off the high wing, some of that fuel may crossfeed into the low wing while you switch sides and go about filling the low wing. If you don't recheck the high wing, you might not notice that the first tank is no longer full, and that you are a few gallons short of the fuel load you planned for your trip. Thanks, Alex |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Therefore, on these longer flights and only during level cruise, the pilot
should be using the Left/Right selector knob to even out this imbalance. I find myself adjusting the selector knob once every thirty minutes or so. -- Peter Peter, Is the procedure of only using one tank only applicable to certain C172 year/models? I've flown a variety of 172's from late 60's models to brand new 2002's, and have always used "both" tanks during flight...just wondering... Thanks, Alex |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Also, why is the fuel selector set to one tank during refueling? Is
it to minimize crossfeeding? Yep. In my Maule, the lower tank will overflow through the vents if this is not done. My 150 (which didn't have the option of selecting tanks) would do the same if the vented tank was the lower one. Note that my Maule will do this even if the selector is set to "off". Dunno if that's the case with a Cessna. Would you mind re-explaining the mechanics you just described? I don't get the "overflow through the vents" part". Thanks a bunch, Alex |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Koopas Ly ) wrote:
Is the procedure of only using one tank only applicable to certain C172 year/models? I've flown a variety of 172's from late 60's models to brand new 2002's, and have always used "both" tanks during flight...just wondering... Switching tanks is not in the '02 172 CRUISE checklist, but it is something that I do to maintain an even balance across both tanks. This is because the difference (at least in the '02 172SP I fly) between the two after a long flight can be substantial. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank" wrote in message
... Tony Cox wrote: Some models of 172 *require* you to select a single tank above 5000', due (supposedly) to vapor lock problems. No 'supposedly' about it. Ours locked at 7500' on a humid day because one of my partners didn't believe it could happen and didn't follow the procedure. Fortunately an airport was within glide range. Strangely enough, by the time he landed the engine was running fine again.... -- Frank....H Its happened to me too. I said 'supposedly' because I've not heard a plausible explanation as to why selecting one particular tank rather than both should affect the chance of vapor lock. Is the fuel selector close to a heat source? -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Dan Thomas wrote:
Lots of old pilots didn't trust fuel gauges, which is still a wise attitude. They'd sometimes fly on one tank until it ran dry and the engine quit, then switch to the other and know exactly how much they had left and how much they'd burned. This doesn't work well if the tanks are very far off the airplane's centreline, as the imbalance can require increases aileron input, causing more drag and tiring the pilot. It can also panic passengers and create unpleasant cabin odors and extra janitorial work after the flight. If you're paying attention and know your fuel burn you can predict the moment of running out within plus/minus a few minutes. When the fuel pressure gauge drops to zero, you still have some time while the engine continues to run smoothly. Switch tanks when the fuel pressure drops, the pax will never know. Of course, you've run some on the other tank previously, so you know the fuel in the other tank is sweet. This old pilot thinks everyone should do this at least once so that they know how their plane behaves in this situation. It also provides a chance to make a direct measurement of exactly what your tank capacity is. Remove SHIRT to reply directly. Dave |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Koopas Ly wrote: Would you mind re-explaining the mechanics you just described? I don't get the "overflow through the vents" part". On the Maule, each tank has two 1/8" tubes which run up through the bottom of the tank and end just below the top, inside the tank. These are vents intended to allow air to enter the tank as fuel is burned. If the tank is overfilled, the excess will also run out the vents. My old 150 had only one of these vents, but it also had vented fuel tank caps. The vent of the 150 is larger than those on Maules. The Maule has a fuel system in which there is a fuel line coming out of one of the lowest spots in the tank. IIRC, the right tank line crosses the cabin just behind the top of the windshield, and both left and right fuel lines then run down inside the left front door post to a valve on the lower left side panel. A single fuel line then runs from here to the engine. In the 150, the valve is in the floor, and I'm not sure if the right line crosses above or below the cabin. The 150 also had a separate line between the two tanks which ran above the cabin to allow air flow between the tanks to try to equalize fuel burn, and fuel flows through this if either tank is more than about 3/8 full. In either case, if the valve is "on" in the 150 or on "both" in the Maule, and you park the plane sideways on an incline, fuel will run downhill to the lower tank through the valve. If both tanks are full, fuel will discharge through the vent tubes on that tank. In my 150, this was only a problem if the plane was parked so that the vent was on the downhill side. Some aircraft have anti-syphon devices on the vent tubes to prevent this sort of thing. Perhaps the 172 does. This problem also occurs in my Maule when the valve is "off", but not when it is set to "left" or "right". I do not understand why this happens, but apparently it is not unique to Maules. I got the suggestion of setting it to one tank from an article in either AOPA Pilot or Sport Aviation some time back. The author was advising someone else who had the same problem. George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"CVBreard" wrote in message ... Lots of old pilots didn't trust fuel gauges, which is still a wise attitude. They'd sometimes fly on one tank until it ran dry and the engine quit, then switch to the other and know exactly how much they had left and how much they'd burned. I'm an old pilot, don't trust fuel gauges and purposely ran a tank dry...only once...scared the hell out of me and my wife. Never did that again. :-) Some planes have more complex fuel management than others. We have 5 tanks on our plane. We've run the tips dry a few times. Yes, it's a bit unsettling, but Margy and I have the tank switch drill down. She hits the pump and I reach for the fuel selector. Of course the real fun one was when Margy switched from the tips to OFF rather than MAIN on downwind one day. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 05:31 PM |
IFR Checkride Checklist | BTIZ | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 04 12:06 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |
Tanks for nothing (repost from Bearhawk list) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | August 6th 03 03:06 AM |