If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
On Dec 3, 3:10*pm, wrote:
I called Red. *Red reports twenty years is max age that he will repack regardless of condition. *Seems like a very good fellow to know for my repacks once I get a newer chute. Lane No matter who you use, with the price of gas, it makes sense to call UPS Ground. For a chute older than 20 yrs, it makes sense to ship it back to the factory for the repack. It might be a few dollars more, but the factory will test the fabric and then do the repack. It makes more sense than driving a round trip just to drop off one parachute and then another round trip just to pick it up. (I even had to do three trips one time because the rigger decided not to open the shop that day) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
I hear what you are saying about the gas! Red said that these
Security chutes are not supported in the US anymore. Evidently there were a few problems over the years. Seems that no matter what condition this chute is in the majority of the riggers (all I have spoken to) want to wash their hands of these chutes. Something to consider when you see cheap ones on Ebay! Lane |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
sisu1a wrote:
The thing is, while it is not an FAA mandate, (the 20yr thing...) the individual packer who certifies it as airworthy has their butt almost as much on the line as yours is while wearing it, and studies have shown that 20 yrs of normal use/exposure is approaching the safe working life limits of the materials. That's not what Strong parachute says, or my rigger, so I'd like to see these studies for myself. Do you have a link to them? Mostly, I'm puzzled by the idea that an emergency parachute has a "working life limit" because it doesn't work: it just sits there. I would think it's only a matter of how long the materials last, and nylon and metal will last indefinitely in a cool, dry place. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
HL Falbaum wrote:
Consider this--amortized over 20 years, a new chute is cheap insurance. You will spend more on repacks if you do it as the law requires. Ask this--if you have to jump, and your old chute fails, how good will you feel about how much you saved? If you could get a brand new one right then, would you write the check on the way down? Recently, Strong refused to repack my 30 year old Strong parachute because the *container* was suspect (some sun bleaching on the upper straps). They suggested I buy a new container, and then they'd be happy to repack the parachute, because the canopy was in excellent condition. I suggest a parachute amortized over 30 years is even cheaper insurance, and you still don't have to write check on the way down. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
On Dec 3, 5:46*pm, wrote:
I hear what you are saying about the gas! *Red said that these Security chutes are not supported in the US anymore. *Evidently there were a few problems over the years. *Seems that no matter what condition this chute is in the majority of the riggers (all I have spoken to) want to wash their hands of these chutes. *Something to consider when you see cheap ones on Ebay! Lane hmmm... I went back to your original post and saw that it was a Security chute. Back in the 80s, they had some serious chemical deterioration issues with their 350 and 850s. Security became an English company in the 70s or early 80s and they terminate the US corporation in 85. So, my suggestion of shipping your chute via "ground" wouldn't work very well, would it. You will probably have a hard time getting a rigger to repack it. Seems like a good time to upgrade. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... HL Falbaum wrote: Consider this--amortized over 20 years, a new chute is cheap insurance. You will spend more on repacks if you do it as the law requires. Ask this--if you have to jump, and your old chute fails, how good will you feel about how much you saved? If you could get a brand new one right then, would you write the check on the way down? Recently, Strong refused to repack my 30 year old Strong parachute because the *container* was suspect (some sun bleaching on the upper straps). They suggested I buy a new container, and then they'd be happy to repack the parachute, because the canopy was in excellent condition. I suggest a parachute amortized over 30 years is even cheaper insurance, and you still don't have to write check on the way down. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA If Strong will certify it, I would be happy to use it. My only point was that if "some" rigger would repack it when another would not, I would get a new chute. In other words, a second opinion is not necessarily better just because it is more favorable. But I would trust the factory that made it. I don't know what deteriorates on a chute, but the cloth of the canopy is only one component. The stitching and the risers could be every bit as important. Hartley Falbaum, Georgia, USA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
HL Falbaum wrote:
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... HL Falbaum wrote: Consider this--amortized over 20 years, a new chute is cheap insurance. You will spend more on repacks if you do it as the law requires. Ask this--if you have to jump, and your old chute fails, how good will you feel about how much you saved? If you could get a brand new one right then, would you write the check on the way down? Recently, Strong refused to repack my 30 year old Strong parachute because the *container* was suspect (some sun bleaching on the upper straps). They suggested I buy a new container, and then they'd be happy to repack the parachute, because the canopy was in excellent condition. I suggest a parachute amortized over 30 years is even cheaper insurance, and you still don't have to write check on the way down. If Strong will certify it, I would be happy to use it. My only point was that if "some" rigger would repack it when another would not, I would get a new chute. In other words, a second opinion is not necessarily better just because it is more favorable. But I would trust the factory that made it. I don't know what deteriorates on a chute, but the cloth of the canopy is only one component. The stitching and the risers could be every bit as important. Sending the parachute to the factory for a repack at least every 5 years, starting at 20 years, seems like a good idea. It wasn't much more to have Strong repack it, even with shipping, than the local rigger. It was just gone longer. This time period seems reasonable for a personal parachute, where you know how it's been treated it's entire life. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Sending the parachute to the factory for a repack at least every 5 years, starting at 20 years, seems like a good idea. It wasn't much more to have Strong repack it, even with shipping, than the local rigger. It was just gone longer. This time period seems reasonable for a personal parachute, where you know how it's been treated it's entire life. "this time period" refers to the "every 5 years, starting at 20 years" remark about sending it to the factory. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
I would like to find a chute repacker closer than the Pepperell,
Massachusetts repacker I have been using for my 20+ year old Security chute.. Google search does not locate a "Kutstown Parachutes", but does locate a couple of skydiving operations there. Could you give me some more specific info as to how to locate or contact Mark? Don't know anything around Atlanta, but I do know that Mark of Kutztown Parachutes, in Kutztown, PA will repack it, if it's airworthy. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Parachute 20 year limit
A parachute life and even the repack periods are historical rather than a
period calculated to be safe, as the Stong article would seem to indicate. Originally parachutes were made from natural fibres, cotton for the container and silk for the canopy. Both these materials do deteriorate over time. The service life and repack periods appear to have been arbitary time periods. Certainly the 6 month repack period goes back to the days of silk canopies and was probably necessary. With the increased use of synthetic fibres the life period certainly became obsolete although some parachute manufacturers hung on to the old limits, well they would wouldn't they if they wanted to sell the things. It seems that the yardstick is now that if you can get a rigger to repack it no problem. The biggest problem appears to be that fitting a new canopy or container may not be an option. For example the original EB80 used the I 24 canopy, the latest versions uses the H 112 canopy. It appears that the I 24 is still available so all may not be lost |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
limit of trim = limit of travel? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 251 | May 11th 08 07:58 PM |
The Sky is Their Limit | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | November 13th 06 02:44 AM |
Pegasus life limit | Mark628CA | Soaring | 2 | March 30th 06 10:37 PM |
Aft CG limit(s) | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 13 | November 26th 03 05:10 AM |
Pushing the limit | Dan Shackelford | Military Aviation | 20 | September 14th 03 10:27 PM |