If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
Partial radar track of the first few minutes of Lidle's Cirrus departing
Teterboro on Passur: http://www4.passur.com/ewr.html Set the clock there for October 11th, 14:30 pm, then click on the first aircraft that departs Teterboro. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
"Peter R." wrote:
Set the clock there for October 11th, 14:30 pm, then click on the first aircraft that departs Teterboro. Failed to include that you have to zoom out to the 20 mile range. There are a couple of aircraft going up the East river around 2:40pm and one disappears in about the area of upper east side. -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
Peter R. wrote:
"Peter R." wrote: Set the clock there for October 11th, 14:30 pm, then click on the first aircraft that departs Teterboro. Failed to include that you have to zoom out to the 20 mile range. There are a couple of aircraft going up the East river around 2:40pm and one disappears in about the area of upper east side. Better link below: http://www4.passur.com/teb.html Use the same info as before... Jerry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
Wow !! 400 feet up to 500 feet then to 400 feet, then 300, then radar return
goes away. Could not have been more than 5 minutes into the flight. If the earlier FT's were correct, even 500 feet should not have put him in IMC "Peter R." wrote in message ... Partial radar track of the first few minutes of Lidle's Cirrus departing Teterboro on Passur: http://www4.passur.com/ewr.html Set the clock there for October 11th, 14:30 pm, then click on the first aircraft that departs Teterboro. -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
jwilljr wrote:
Better link below: http://www4.passur.com/teb.html Use the same info as before... 14:40 and using this link shows a GA aircraft going north up the East River, then turns back to the south and disappears. Sad how that little cartoon is sugar coating the image of the end of someone's life. -- Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
I looked at the footage from the LGA Passur site... same thing.
I know nobody should be speculating at this point, so I'll just say that compared to the Hudson river corridor, the East River corridor is quite a bit tighter in terms of the area you have to work in when making the turn at the 59th St. Bridge. Even at maneuvering speed, you want to make the turn as tight as possible, both to avoid straying into LGA's airspace, and also to (obviously) avoid hitting anything in Manhattan. -- Guy pgbnh wrote: Wow !! 400 feet up to 500 feet then to 400 feet, then 300, then radar return goes away. Could not have been more than 5 minutes into the flight. If the earlier FT's were correct, even 500 feet should not have put him in IMC "Peter R." wrote in message ... Partial radar track of the first few minutes of Lidle's Cirrus departing Teterboro on Passur: http://www4.passur.com/ewr.html Set the clock there for October 11th, 14:30 pm, then click on the first aircraft that departs Teterboro. -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
Guy Elden Jr wrote:
I looked at the footage from the LGA Passur site... same thing. I know nobody should be speculating at this point, No harm in talking or writing, as long as you're not purporting to be an official data source. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
"Guy Elden Jr" wrote in message ups.com... I looked at the footage from the LGA Passur site... same thing. I know nobody should be speculating at this point, so I'll just say that compared to the Hudson river corridor, the East River corridor is quite a bit tighter in terms of the area you have to work in when making the turn at the 59th St. Bridge. Even at maneuvering speed, you want to make the turn as tight as possible, both to avoid straying into LGA's airspace, and also to (obviously) avoid hitting anything in Manhattan. Why should nobody be speculating at this point? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Why should nobody be speculating at this point? That's the media's job. I don't have all the facts, just my experiences of having flown in the same general area quite a few times, and the radar track as seen on Passur. I did just fire up Flight Simulator 2004 tho with an SR-20 to see if that turn is even possible, and flying north at 100 kts, 30 degree bank to the left, maintaining level flight, I was not able to avoid crossing over into Manhattan when starting from directly over the east bank of the East River. Maybe it's doable at a slower speed, but you'd have to probably drop flaps to safely slow the plane down more. (not sure what the clean stall speed is of that plane). -- Guy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Radar track of Lidle's aircraft caught on Passur
"Guy Elden Jr" wrote in message
oups.com... I don't have all the facts, just my experiences of having flown in the same general area quite a few times, and the radar track as seen on Passur. I did just fire up Flight Simulator 2004 tho with an SR-20 to see if that turn is even possible, and flying north at 100 kts, 30 degree bank to the left, maintaining level flight, I was not able to avoid crossing over into Manhattan when starting from directly over the east bank of the East River. Maybe it's doable at a slower speed, but you'd have to probably drop flaps to safely slow the plane down more. (not sure what the clean stall speed is of that plane). It's a tight enough turn that pilots shouldn't be flying it (other than in a simulator) without first calculating the appropriate speed and bank for the required turn radius. Practicing the turn first over suitably spaced landmarks (but without the tall buildings nearby) would also be a good idea, I think. --Gary |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |