If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DE BORCHGRAVE: Attack plans spiked (Washington Times)?
DE BORCHGRAVE: Attack plans spiked (be sure to scroll down to the
comments section as well)? Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-plans-spiked/ See Video: Neocons Pushed Us into War with Iraq and Now with Iran! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbxD5...x=0&playnext=1 Here is a tiny URL for the above one: http://tinyurl.com/5johhg http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....with-iraq.html Here is a tiny URL for the above one: http://tinyurl.com/5aspp5 Additional linked via the pics at the following URLs: http://neoconzionistthreat.com http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com Looking Into the Lobby The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference is one of Washington’s most important—and least reported—events. by Philip Weiss For three days in the capital in early June, suspense built over the question of how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference would greet Barack Obama. There was a lot of grousing about Obama in the hallways of the Washington Convention Center, and AIPAC officials repeatedly warned the faithful to be respectful. “We are not a debate society or a protest movement. … our goal is to have a friend in the White House,” executive director Howard Kohr said in a strict tone. It wasn’t hard to imagine things going poorly: Obama gets booed on national television. He feels insulted. Conservative Jewish donors and voters turn off to Obama. He becomes president without their support. AIPAC has no friend in the Oval Office. But of course, Obama complied. His speech became the annual example the conference provides of a powerful man truckling. Two years ago, it was Vice President Cheney’s red-meat speech attacking the Palestinians. Last year, it was Pastor John Hagee’s scary speech saying that giving the Arabs any part of Jerusalem was the same as giving it to the Taliban. Obama took a similar line. He suggested that he would use force to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, made no mention of Palestinian human rights, and said that Jerusalem “must remain undivided,” a statement so disastrous to the peace process that his staff rescinded it the next day. Big deal. The actual meeting had gone swimmingly. This was my first AIPAC conference, and the first surprise was how blatant the business of wielding influence is. The conference makes no bones about this function, the most savage expression of which is the Tuesday dinner at which AIPAC performs its “roll call,” where the names of all the politicians who have come to the conference are read off from the stage by three barkers in near auctioneer fashion. The pols try to outdo one another in I-love-Israel encomia. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi surely won the day when she teared up while dangling the dogtags of three Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas two years ago. The second big surprise was that apart from coverage of the headline speakers, the AIPAC conference is a media no man’s land. It would be hard to imagine a more naked exhibition of political power: a convention of 7,000 mostly rich people, with more than half the Congress in attendance, as well as all the major presidential candidates, the prime minister of Israel, the minority leader, the majority leader, and the speaker of the House. Yet there is precious little journalism about the spectacle in full. The reason seems obvious: the press would have to write openly about a forbidden subject, Jewish influence. They would have to take on an unpleasant informative task that they have instead left to two international relations scholars in their 50s—Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, authors of last year’s book The Israel Lobby. The press is missing a phantasmagorical event. Imagine a basement meeting in the Warsaw Ghetto transplanted to the biggest hall in Vegas, and you have something of the feeling of the thing. The staging is faultless. Little documentaries called “Zionist Stories” play on the Jumbotron, complete with footage of Auschwitz, and then the subject of the documentary comes out on stage to thundering applause. There is breakout session after breakout session on Middle East policy and Jewish identity and anti-Semitism, with star turns by Natan Sharansky, Bill Kristol, and Leon Wieseltier. The press was excluded from “Advanced Lobbying Techniques,” but still this is a feast of the political condition. And posh. The roll call is described by AIPAC as the largest seated dinner in Washington. The wine flows. I went about in a daze of awe and admiration. My awe was for men like Haim Saban, a toymaker and giant donor to the Democratic Party. After his Zionist story, Saban came out on stage wearing a platinum tie and white shirt and silver gray suit. He has wonderful presence and something of an Arab look—black-haired, wide forehead. He was surrounded by 200 college students, veterans of the Saban Leadership Seminars he sponsors at AIPAC. On Middle East policy, Saban is barely distinguishable from his Republican counterparts, who are there in equal force. The main hall of the conference was filled with lavishly-produced banners featuring AIPAC donors, not a few with trophy wives, alongside statements of their mission. There was Donald Diamond, an Arizona real estate developer whom the New York Times recently profiled on the front page after he raised $250,000 for John McCain. The Times said nothing in its piece about Diamond’s Israel work. But that was all the banner was about. “The U.S.-Israel relationship is the single most important determinant of democracy in the world, and we must commit to securing it,” Diamond wrote. “It is so obvious to us that the Jewish community is a family and that we have to take care of each other.” I was writing that down when an AIPAC spokesman stopped to check my credentials. The audience for this stuff isn’t the public, it’s people in the hall—other rich Jews who might put AIPAC in their wills. At most conventions, people gather out of self-interest. Therein lies my admiration: the AIPAC’ers didn’t come for selfish reasons. They are devoutly concerned with the lives of people they don’t know, very far away. Yes, people with whom they feel tribal kinship. When Israelis came out on the dais to speak, they were almost invariably overwhelmed by the generosity, if not the Vegas schmaltz. “There is a tremendous amount of love in this place,” Meir Nissensohn, an Israeli executive of IBM, said in wonder. “If it was a beaker, it would explode.” Even a sharp critic like myself of what AIPAC is doing to American policy in the Middle East was frequently moved by the pure loving feeling that surrounds you at every moment. Among the devout there is only one real issue: What is the latest AIPAC line? This is the organization’s function. After consulting closely with the Israeli political leadership (leaning toward the right wing), AIPAC regurgitates a simple version of Israeli policy to its followers, who in turn regurgitate that line to American politicians. AIPAC’ers do this with the conviction that Israel’s life is on the line. “It is we that are the guardians of that relationship,” AIPAC president David Victor said. James Tisch, the Lowes executive and leader in the Jewish community, warned the audience that it might be 1939 all over again were it not for them. AIPAC makes sure the Israeli line is America’s line by cultivating politicians before they reach the national scene. Victor described this process when he warned the audience that 10 percent of Congress will be new next year because so many seats are open: “Do we know them? Do they know us? Have they __________________________________________ Philip Weiss is at work on a book about Jewish issues. He blogs at www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/ -------------------------------------------------------- Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 2:29 PM Commentary: Guns of August spiked? http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/...8101215458112/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Stop The AIPAC sponsored "Iran War Resolution" http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=91563 Additional about AIPAC's push for the coming war with Iran via the following URL (be sure to access the Scott Ritter youtubes linked at the top of the comments section as well): AIPAC Pushing US to War with Iran for Israel: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....with-iran.html Hedges: It's Insane to Attack Iran: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....tack-iran.html Bob Barr: Attacking Iran Highly Irresponsible and Detrimental: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....an-highly.html McCain's loyalty is to Israel first and foremost: http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot....ubscribe..html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commentary: Guns of August spiked? | NOMOREWARFORISRAEL[_2_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 7th 08 09:06 PM |
Mohamed El Baradei says war drums beating for Iran like they did in the run up to the Iraq war (Washington Times) | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 1 | September 9th 07 05:30 AM |
US 'Iran attack plans' revealed (BBC exclusive) | dontcowerfromthetruth | Naval Aviation | 7 | February 21st 07 01:19 AM |
SCOTT RITTER SAYS U.S. PLANS JUNE ATTACK ON IRAN | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 1 | February 22nd 05 05:06 PM |