If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#261
|
|||
|
|||
Which airfield? Sorry, I don't have the reference here at home. Its the
same place where the Army POWs were transferred to the KC-130 on TV. "Guy Alcala" wrote in message .. . Frijoles wrote: snip On the warfighting side, if fighting an air war was simply a matter of stacking jets somewhere, we could cover the entire battlespace with B-1s or B-2s. (A trivia question -- how many CV sorties does it take to cover the same number of DMPIs that ONE B-1 with a full load of SDBs can cover?) And if tanking isn't an "issue," what's up with all the bragging about what a great tanking capability the Navy's brand new STRIKE aircraft provides...? Especially since they had to send four more F-18Es to the theater during the war, to boost the navy's own tanker assets (and of course, taking away airbridge tanker assets from other jobs, to get them there). 45% of Marine CAS sorties during OIF were flown by Harriers -- that's hardly a trivial number, particularly if you're on the ground getting shot at, or facing the prospect of having to deal with massed armor and indirect fires. IIRC, about 1500 strike sorties were flown off L-class ships, principally Bataan and BHR which each operated 20-25 jets. A couple hundred were flown from a "recovered" airfield within 10 minutes of Baghdad. snip Would you happen to know which airfield? I've found one source that says it was "60nm south" of Baghdad, but no other details. Looking at a map, http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middl...print_2003.jpg Shayka Mazhar and Al Iskandariyah New appear to be too close to the city, Salman Pak East is too close and too far east (although the Marines did go by there IIRR). An Najaf New is due south of Baghdad and about the right distance, but AFAIK the marines weren't near there in any strength, having crossed the Euphrates at Nasiriya before heading up between the rivers towards Baghdad. The Shaykh Hantush Highway Strip seems to be the closest match for distance and direction, but the marines also went through al Kut, which puts An Numaniyah (I know they took that) or Al Jarrah in the picture (although they're more SE than S), and possibly the fields south and/or east of Al Kut, altough they're a bit far and definitely southeast. Guy |
#262
|
|||
|
|||
Frijoles wrote:
Which airfield? Sorry, I don't have the reference here at home. Its the same place where the Army POWs were transferred to the KC-130 on TV. Thanks. I think that was Tallil down near Nasiriyah, which seems a bit far from Baghdad (a lot more than 60 nm), but I know there was a big hospital set up there, as well as a FOB for A-10s. Guy |
#263
|
|||
|
|||
Pooh Bear wrote in message ...
running with scissors wrote: Pooh Bear wrote in message ... Actually - you succeeded in diverting my attention from what I consider to be one of the more intruiging aspects of this crash - notably a suggested compressor stall. Graham nope no comressor stall. according to tarver, airbus's crash at the end of the runway because its unknown and unmapped. Scary concept ! Is it in the annals ? Graham its utter ********. like any of tarvers theories. |
#264
|
|||
|
|||
You're correct that the A-10 FOB was "near Nasiryah" -- but that was well
south of the location that the Marine Corps used. The Marine Corps wanted something further north to support possible operations to the north (and well north) of Baghdad. "Guy Alcala" wrote in message .. . Frijoles wrote: Which airfield? Sorry, I don't have the reference here at home. Its the same place where the Army POWs were transferred to the KC-130 on TV. Thanks. I think that was Tallil down near Nasiriyah, which seems a bit far from Baghdad (a lot more than 60 nm), but I know there was a big hospital set up there, as well as a FOB for A-10s. Guy |
#265
|
|||
|
|||
Frijoles wrote:
You're correct that the A-10 FOB was "near Nasiryah" -- but that was well south of the location that the Marine Corps used. That's what I thought. I finally found a news story that ID'ed the airfield they were flown to by CH-46 as Numaniyah. The Marine Corps wanted something further north to support possible operations to the north (and well north) of Baghdad. Just found a news story that confirmed use of Numaniyah as a Harrier FARP: http://www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn20...F?opendocument Guy |
#266
|
|||
|
|||
The 747 had its cockpit placed above the main cabin so they could open
the nose for loading in the cargo variant, i.e., it was designed from the beginning to carry cargo. That feature is where the 747 shows it's origins. The design the 747 was derived from was the losing contender in the C-X (correct me if that designation is incorrect) competition. That competition was won by the Lockheed design --- the C-5 Galaxy. Boeing took their C-X design and reworked it as a civilian passenger aircraft. Who knows, maybe if Boeing had won the competition, we'd see the Lockheed L-1012 Galaxy as the king of civilian widebodys? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- In thrust we trust! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 8 | July 8th 04 07:01 AM |
More LED's | Veeduber | Home Built | 19 | June 9th 04 10:07 PM |
Replace fabric with glass | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 38 | April 17th 04 11:37 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |