If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 5, 3:46*pm, Bob Whelan wrote:
wrote: Sensible stuff snipped... * What is amusing is that pilots who have never had the opportunity to fly an AOA-indicator equipped aircraft seem to be reluctant to accept it's advantages and cling to their old ways, while pilots who have used AOA gauges love them. Apologies for not re-titling this thread, but I've gotta second Kirk's observation, and, generalize it to include (for example) landing flaps and 'anything else abbie-normal.' I haven't flown an AOA-equipped glider, but I'd sure like to. Meanwhile since 1981 I've been flying a genyoowinely abbie-normal sailplane: American racing glass (Strike 1!); w/o spoilers (Strike 2!!); and a side-stick (Strike 3!!!) Oh yeah...while I'm at it, it never had a chance at obtaining an approved (non-experimental) type certificate, either. (You're not only out...you're outta the GAME!!!!) Writ smilingly, with a rueful shake of the head, we pilots as a group tend to be: a) relentlessly conservative/sheeplike in our 'common wisdoms'; b) vocal in our (often not-factually-supported) opinions; and c) 'too-often guilty' of passing off the latter as matters of fact. Regards, 'Asbestos Bob' W. Every book on airfoils from the venerable Abbot's "Theory of Wing Sections" to more modern treatises on aerodynamics show graphs of an airfoils coefficient of lift vs. angle of attack. The other graphs have the Cl on the X-axis so everything about a wings performance goes back to angle of attack. You won't see any airfoil section graphs showing airspeed. Angle of attack is THE key to knowing what a wing is doing. Renowned books on flying from "Stick and Rudder" by Wolfgang Langewiesche to "Fly the Wing" by James Webb hammer home precisely that point - angle of attack is everything. Airspeed, while useful, doesn't come close. The situation where jets which spend 99% of their time flying fast have found AOA indicators essential and gliders which spend up to half their time flying near stall don't have them has always puzzled me. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 5, 5:27*pm, "
wrote: What is amusing is that pilots who have never had the opportunity to fly an AOA-indicator equipped aircraft seem to be reluctant to accept it's advantages and cling to their old ways, while pilots who have used AOA gauges love them. Kirk 66 Me personally ( and I bet most of those reluctant pilots ) are NOT reluctant to _fly_ with an AOA indicator. I am reluctant to spend more than a small amount of money on that indicator. I also believe that an AOA indicator is only a small increase in safety. If my attention wanders from the airspeed, pitch attitude, stick feel and position and other indications of low airspeed, I don't think that the AOA indicator would be exempt from that in-attention. I do believe that the AOA would allow more precise flying with different wing loadings, but I don't see many times in soaring that precise AOA control is needed. Again, if someone had put one in my panel, I wouldn't throw it away, but I would not spend a lot of money on it. Todd Smith 3S |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
Apologies for not re-titling this thread, but I've gotta second Kirk's
observation, and, generalize it to include (for example) landing flaps and 'anything else abbie-normal.' I haven't flown an AOA-equipped glider, but I'd sure like to. Meanwhile since 1981 I've been flying a genyoowinely abbie-normal sailplane: American racing glass (Strike 1!); w/o spoilers (Strike 2!!); and a side-stick (Strike 3!!!) Oh yeah...while I'm at it, it never had a chance at obtaining an approved (non-experimental) type certificate, either. (You're not only out...you're outta the GAME!!!!) Writ smilingly, with a rueful shake of the head, we pilots as a group tend to be: a) relentlessly conservative/sheeplike in our 'common wisdoms'; b) vocal in our (often not-factually-supported) opinions; and c) 'too-often guilty' of passing off the latter as matters of fact. Regards, 'Asbestos Bob' W. Bob, did you make it to the Zuni Pow Wow in Moriarty? The Zuni is a cool looking ship - check out the great photos on the ASA homepage at http://asa-soaring.org/ - click on the pics for full screen & enjoy a beautiful finish to a long flight by Randy Acree in AV8! Kirk |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 6, 11:35*am, bildan wrote:
The situation where jets which spend 99% of their time flying fast have found AOA indicators essential and gliders which spend up to half their time flying near stall don't have them has always puzzled me. Might that not be because those jets are total pigs when flown at approach speed? I suspect that if they didn't have the AOA indicator then either they would get approached way too fast or else the pilot would be in a constant state of "we're all gonna DIE!!". And they're going pretty fast while trying to land on small things, such as ships. They're also landing well below min drag/sink speed, on the "back side of the drag curve" and depending on big engines to save their bacon if the AOA starts to get too high. If we did that in gliders then we'd sometimes have little option but to dive into the ground in a mush even if we closed the brakes instantly. Unlike those jets, we in gliders fly the approach faster and with a lower angle of attack than many other phases of flight, deliberately sacrificing some ultimate short landing performance for a large increase in safety. I can see that an AOA indicator would be useful for establishing various reference speeds at a particular weight or bank angle, and then maintain that configuration via our traditional method of attitude with respect to the horizon. But I don't think it's something that we'd ever want to use as a primary reference while flying, The flight path of a typical glider flown at a fixed angle of attack is a diverging phugoid. That's not very useful. Least of all on approach. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
There are several thing in this post to which I take exception. However, I will mention one. A carrier approach is NOT flown on the "back-side" of the power curve. They are flown at optimum L/D for the wing when the wing is in its' landing configuration.
Oh, just one more comment..... I have never know a carrier aviation who thought "we're all gonna DIE!!" when the making a carrier approach with an inoperative AOA. "Bruce Hoult" wrote in message ... On Jun 6, 11:35 am, bildan wrote: The situation where jets which spend 99% of their time flying fast have found AOA indicators essential and gliders which spend up to half their time flying near stall don't have them has always puzzled me. Might that not be because those jets are total pigs when flown at approach speed? I suspect that if they didn't have the AOA indicator then either they would get approached way too fast or else the pilot would be in a constant state of "we're all gonna DIE!!". And they're going pretty fast while trying to land on small things, such as ships. They're also landing well below min drag/sink speed, on the "back side of the drag curve" and depending on big engines to save their bacon if the AOA starts to get too high. If we did that in gliders then we'd sometimes have little option but to dive into the ground in a mush even if we closed the brakes instantly. Unlike those jets, we in gliders fly the approach faster and with a lower angle of attack than many other phases of flight, deliberately sacrificing some ultimate short landing performance for a large increase in safety. I can see that an AOA indicator would be useful for establishing various reference speeds at a particular weight or bank angle, and then maintain that configuration via our traditional method of attitude with respect to the horizon. But I don't think it's something that we'd ever want to use as a primary reference while flying, The flight path of a typical glider flown at a fixed angle of attack is a diverging phugoid. That's not very useful. Least of all on approach. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
Some good info on AOA systems for lightplanes, including theory and
installations, at: http://www.advanced-flight-systems.c...s/AOA/aoa.html This system uses flush ports on the top and bottom of the wing, along with pitot and static inputs, to measure the Cl of the wing in real time (and derive AOA). No probes or vanes needed. With a glider, you would have to connect the tubing when rigging - but you could use pitot/static quick connect for that. Too bad our market is too small - a dedicated system for gliders, installed at the factory, would be nice - especially if integrated with an glide computer to share processing power, etc. There was also a totally passive Cl meter (using pellet-in-tube technology!) that was described in detail in a old (70s?) issue of soaring. Kirk 66 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 6, 5:21*pm, "
wrote: Some good info on AOA systems for lightplanes, including theory and installations, at: http://www.advanced-flight-systems.c...s/AOA/aoa.html This system uses flush ports on the top and bottom of the wing, along with pitot and static inputs, to measure the Cl of the wing in real time (and derive AOA). *No probes or vanes needed. With a glider, you would have to connect the tubing when rigging - but you could use pitot/static quick connect for that. Too bad our market is too small *- a dedicated system for gliders, installed at the factory, would be nice - especially if integrated with an glide computer to share processing power, etc. There was also a totally passive Cl meter (using pellet-in-tube technology!) that was described in detail in a old (70s?) issue of soaring. Kirk 66 I am a bit confounded by the several suggestions that AOA info in the cockpit would be a bad thing. Frankly a little alarm for stall AOA at each flap setting would be quite welcome for those moments on approach where you get distracted. I am not entirely sure I would use it for cruise, since airspeeds are quite adequate for this purpose and no one I know flies best L/D or even precise McCready speeds very much anymore. It might be helpful in thermalling to get to the precise minimum sink AOA, though I do wonder again how useful this would be since you typically want to fly with a bit of margin above the laminar separation speed because dipping below is quite costly in terms of the accumulated drag losses before you get the flow re-attached. A cool thing to know for me would be the maximum AOA for each loading and flap setting that still keeps you consistently away from separation given gusts, unsteady aerodynamic effects, etc. Unfortunately, that number doesn't come out of the POH, so we are back to some form of flight testing I think - or some sort of rule of thumb. Even the simple calibration Bill suggests requires three data points for each flap setting. My glider has 6 flap settings - times three operating points each yields 18 data points - okay that's not a ridiculous number, probably a couple of tows on a calm day. 9B |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 6, 6:21*pm, "
wrote: Some good info on AOA systems for lightplanes, including theory and installations, at: http://www.advanced-flight-systems.c...s/AOA/aoa.html This system uses flush ports on the top and bottom of the wing, along with pitot and static inputs, to measure the Cl of the wing in real time (and derive AOA). *No probes or vanes needed. With a glider, you would have to connect the tubing when rigging - but you could use pitot/static quick connect for that. Too bad our market is too small *- a dedicated system for gliders, installed at the factory, would be nice - especially if integrated with an glide computer to share processing power, etc. There was also a totally passive Cl meter (using pellet-in-tube technology!) that was described in detail in a old (70s?) issue of soaring. Kirk 66 Careful reading of their installation manual suggests that it might work with nose ports. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
would an AOA indicator be helpful in a glider?
On Jun 7, 2:14*pm, bildan wrote:
On Jun 6, 6:21*pm, " wrote: Some good info on AOA systems for lightplanes, including theory and installations, at: http://www.advanced-flight-systems.c...s/AOA/aoa.html This system uses flush ports on the top and bottom of the wing, along with pitot and static inputs, to measure the Cl of the wing in real time (and derive AOA). *No probes or vanes needed. With a glider, you would have to connect the tubing when rigging - but you could use pitot/static quick connect for that. Too bad our market is too small *- a dedicated system for gliders, installed at the factory, would be nice - especially if integrated with an glide computer to share processing power, etc. There was also a totally passive Cl meter (using pellet-in-tube technology!) that was described in detail in a old (70s?) issue of soaring. Kirk 66 Careful reading of their installation manual suggests that it might work with nose ports. I just got an e-mail from Advanced Flight Systems indicating that one of their units has been installed on a glider with top and bottom nosecone ports. The glider was apparently a Sparrowhawk and the unit works great. Since the AFS system is available with flap position sensors and standard LED displays, it appears to be exactly what we need. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider angle of attack indicator by SafeFlight | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 53 | December 20th 07 12:29 PM |
Helpful controller | Ridge | Piloting | 3 | July 12th 07 11:57 PM |
Ode to the Helpful Homebuilder | [email protected] | Home Built | 13 | November 10th 06 08:37 AM |
Need glider airspeed indicator | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 05 09:57 PM |
Which rating would be more helpful? | Jeffrey LLoyd | Piloting | 2 | July 17th 03 07:02 PM |