Bill Daniels wrote: 
 
 
 "André Somers"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 
  What are your thoughts on Real-Time Linux for this application? 
 
 I guess that depends on what you want to do with it. For one, you can't 
 use 
 it for primairy instruments, at least not here. The greatest power of 
 using 
 a computer is where it is used now too: navigational aid and 
 flightcomputer 
 functions. For that, you don't really need a RT system IMHO. 
 
 André 
 
 
 Well, you probably couldn't CERTIFY a computer display for the primary 
 instruments (without a lot of money) but by displaying the primary 
 instrument data on the computer screen, all the flight data would be in 
 one 
 place and easy to read.  Keep the old primary instruments in the panel to 
 keep things legal and just hinge the thin computer screen over them so 
 that if you need to peek just lift the screen. 
Apart from the legal aspects, I don't really see many advantages to making 
the primairy instruments electronic (or obscuring them with a screen,wich 
is illegal here I think). The "normal" instruments are very easy to 
interpret (it has been shown that round dials are by far the easiest to 
comprehend for the human brain: judging angles is easier than judging a 
distance or reading and interpretting a figure.) That doesn't say that you 
couldn't use the data also on the screen, but I would not make it primairy. 
An electronic system *is* more likely to fail, if only due to poor battery 
conditions. 
Having said that, I haven't found a useable x86 system yet. Maybe I'm 
looking in the wrong place, but a system like a VIA EPIA board still takes 
about 30W. Using a 12V battery, that means 2,5A. That's a heavy load; my 
battery would last maybe two, max three hours. And that is without a 
screen... 
 
André 
 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |