|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
April 17th 04, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
yes.
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... "Brad Z" wrote: This issue comes up from time to time. The assumption here is that you are not being provied vectors for the approach. The official rule is that unless there is a note allowing the exception of a PT (i.e. 'NoPT'), a procedure turn is required. So yes, that means a turn in a bold hold or backtracking out on the approach course for a course reversal. Next question. Does anybody actually do this? Assuming that you were already established on the FAC and didn't need to lose any altitude, does anybody actually do a PT just because a literal reading of the regs says you're supposed to? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Boeing 757 turn rate? | Garyurbach | Aerobatics | 6 | June 14th 04 05:43 PM |
| Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 19th 04 12:42 AM |
| Calculating vertical time and distance in a stall turn (US Hammerhead) | Dave | Aerobatics | 3 | November 20th 03 11:48 AM |
| Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 11:40 PM |
Threaded Mode