![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
But I can see where it *could* take at least an extra minute for
some planes which are slicker or if the pilot is unwilling to just throttle back. Yes, I call it the EDM effect. Once you buy a graphic engine analyiser and see how fast your engine freezes when you pull power, you'll think twice before pulling back too far when coming down. -Robert |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Smith wrote:
Not me. Try it some day in VFR conditions. Fly the glide slope (or VASI) down to 200 AGL at 120 KIAS with the flaps up, then try to land and see how much runway you use up. On my last IFR proficiency lesson (my first lesson since obtaining my instrument rating last March), the instructor had me fly the ILS at 110 knots until about DH, then slow it down and do a short field landing at 60 knots in a C172. I was able to do it and land in a few hundred feet, but I'll be danged if I can do it again without floating/ballooning. ![]() More practice, I suppose. -- Peter |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd only practice ILS "peddle faster!" approaches. You'll only get the
request at a large airport and then you'll always get it on the ILS. Large airplanes fly the ILS at 140 to 160, so if you go from 90 to 120 kts, you'll help them alot, and in my Arrow, the procedure is: Fly the approach with trim, leave power in. At breakout, pull power and wait for 150 MPH or lower. Lower the gear. Wait for 100 MPH. Lower flaps. Land. Never had a complaint. As for breakout, I don't worry about speed. At these airports there is plenty of runway and the arrow stops on a dime... Now, if I were in a Mooney......... -- remove underscores to email "Ben Jackson" wrote in message news:N1t4b.316097$o%2.144170@sccrnsc02... A few questions about fast (by spamcan standards) approaches in busy terminal environments: 1) Is there any point in practicing any "best forward speed" approaches besides the ILS? 2) How fast is fast enough? Obviously 120kts is better than 90kts (maybe 1.5m less time after you turn onto the localizer), but does the additional 20-30 seconds saved by going 130-140kts make a difference? 3) Do you fly these in a different flap/gear configuration or just use more power? 4) Do you try this even when expecting to break out at minimums (with less time to slow down)? -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 05:31 PM |
| Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 10:36 PM |
| Forward Swept Wings | Canuck Bob | Home Built | 16 | October 3rd 03 06:50 PM |
| Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 06:10 PM |
| Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 02:43 PM |