A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Violating Airspace with GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old November 5th 03, 06:56 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
|
| Garmin should offer a 1000 trade up program to the 430/530/80 owners that
| they couldn't refuse. It would save a lot of headache. It's already going
to
| cost a mint to get TAWS, traffic, weather, and VNAV approaches on the
older
| units anyway.
|

We looked at what such an upgrade would entail. For my 206 we would have to
replace the entire panel.


  #52  
Old November 5th 03, 09:52 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry,


I was just trying to understand your rationale. I guess you're
unwilling to share anything other than your opinion. Oh well...



Ok. My feeling is you're playing dumb. But I've been wrong before. So
one more try at taking you serious. Two examples:

1. VFR
No matter whether you fly over featureless terrain in the Southwest,
the Kansas plains or over water - one glance at the moving map will
tell you where you are, how long it will take you to get anywhere, how
far you are from an airspace border. Granted, you can get all that
information without the map - but it takes much more effort, taken away
from your total mental capacity and thus degrading safety.

2. IFR
Well, take any approach into Podunk field, with no radar coverage and a
ton of step-downs and terrain around you, then add high wind. One
glance at the moving map will tell you where you are with relation to
the approach, the terrain and any navaids. No more figuring out which
side of the protected airspace the wind may have blown you. Granted,
you can get all that information without the map - but it takes much
more effort, taken away from your total mental capacity and thus
degrading safety.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #53  
Old November 5th 03, 09:52 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry,

Lot's of head-down time I'd expect. That's not prudent in the LA
basin.


So you don't do it in the LA basin...

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #54  
Old November 5th 03, 03:33 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



C J Campbell wrote:

Not hardly. Even the panel mounts require manual input.


Rocky Mountain Instrument sells a unit that provides your GPS altitude info from
both your altimeter and your encoder, true airspeed, and magnetic heading.
http://www.rkymtn.com

George Patterson
If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging
the problem.
  #55  
Old November 5th 03, 03:52 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default




"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

Lot's of head-down time I'd expect. That's not prudent in the LA
basin.


On the Garmin GPS Pilot III you hit the menu button twice, hit the up
arrow button twice and then enter. Now you are at the main screen.
Input a few numbers and you are done. Whole thing takes less than a minute.

  #56  
Old November 5th 03, 03:57 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
| Larry,
|
| Lot's of head-down time I'd expect. That's not prudent in the LA
| basin.
|
|
| So you don't do it in the LA basin...
|

For that matter, why would you want to?


  #57  
Old November 5th 03, 08:16 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



C J Campbell wrote:

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
| Larry,
|
| Lot's of head-down time I'd expect. That's not prudent in the LA
| basin.
|
|
| So you don't do it in the LA basin...
|

For that matter, why would you want to?


No ****, what idiot would fly in the LA Basin?

  #58  
Old November 5th 03, 09:25 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
news:y0cqb.82096$mZ5.560361@attbi_s54...


C J Campbell wrote:

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
| Larry,
|
| Lot's of head-down time I'd expect. That's not prudent in the LA
| basin.
|
|
| So you don't do it in the LA basin...
|

For that matter, why would you want to?


No ****, what idiot would fly in the LA Basin?


A masochistic one.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? john smith Home Built 11 August 27th 04 03:29 AM
most of eastern Massachussetts airspace closed in July Christopher C. Stacy Instrument Flight Rules 29 June 19th 04 01:47 AM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 07:12 PM
Help - I busted into the Class B SEATAC airspace last night, does anyone have any advice ? steve mew Piloting 38 October 28th 03 07:08 PM
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 August 10th 03 06:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.