Re: babble, was Re: Why didn't Bush fight?

[ArtKramr]

>Subject: Re: babble, was Re: Why didn't Bush fight?
>From: "S. O. Damocles"
>Date: 8/29/2004 2:09 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>Bob Coe wrote:
>> "S. O. Damocles" > wrote
>>> Perry wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:40:55 -0600, "S. O. Damocles"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ArtKramr wrote:
>>>>>> Anyone have a reasion? Any reason?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cowardice?
>>>>
>>>> Ask Clinton.
>>>
>>> You mean the one who actually qualified to be a Rhodes
>>> Scholar?
>>
>> Didn't fight.
>
>Didn't go AWOL or Desert either, he actually qualified for
>and obtained a Rhodes Scholarship.
>

The neocons will never forgive Clinton his intelligence. Intelligence is not
the neocon way.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

[BUFDRVR]

ArtKramr wrote:

>The neocons will never forgive Clinton his intelligence. Intelligence is not
>the neocon way.
>

Nice job shifting the issue old man. Clinton didn't fight and according to the
Art Kramer doctrine he was neither worthy nor acceptable to be the President.
The one problem with that is our "friend" Art Kramer voted for him twice.
Hmmmm...


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

[Tank Fixer]

In article >,
on 29 Aug 2004 21:52:11 GMT,
ArtKramr attempted to say .....

> >Subject: Re: babble, was Re: Why didn't Bush fight?
> >From: "S. O. Damocles"
> >Date: 8/29/2004 2:09 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: >
> >
> >Bob Coe wrote:
> >> "S. O. Damocles" > wrote
> >>> Perry wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:40:55 -0600, "S. O. Damocles"
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ArtKramr wrote:
> >>>>>> Anyone have a reasion? Any reason?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cowardice?
> >>>>
> >>>> Ask Clinton.
> >>>
> >>> You mean the one who actually qualified to be a Rhodes
> >>> Scholar?
> >>
> >> Didn't fight.
> >
> >Didn't go AWOL or Desert either, he actually qualified for
> >and obtained a Rhodes Scholarship.
> >
>
> The neocons will never forgive Clinton his intelligence. Intelligence is not
> the neocon way.

If he was so smart why did he get caught diddling a subordinate ?



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"ArtKramr" > wrote in message
...
>
> The neocons will never forgive Clinton his intelligence. Intelligence is
> not
> the neocon way.
>

Clinton wasn't all that intelligent.