Bum Dope

[Veeduber]

23 October 2003

I recently told a fellow he should be using a different cam in his engine.

Later messages made it clear I had been talking to the wrong guy. (I get lots
of mail.) Trouble is, now I can't remember WHO I was talking to. So here's a
general retraction, cross-posted.

If you're planning to fly behind a stock 1600cc VW engine I think you should
keep the stock cam. That assumes you're swinging a long, efficient prop at
2500 to 3000 rpm. The cam I referred you toward does fine on big-bore strokers
but does WORSE than the stock cam when used on engines having displacement of
120cid or less. (Stock is about 96cid; 1834 is about 112.)

If you went ahead and bought the other cam, I'll buy it off you.

-R.S.Hoover

[Del Rawlins]

On 23 Oct 2003 11:46 AM, Veeduber posted the following:
> 23 October 2003
>
> I recently told a fellow he should be using a different cam in his
> engine.
>
> Later messages made it clear I had been talking to the wrong guy. (I
> get lots of mail.) Trouble is, now I can't remember WHO I was talking
> to. So here's a general retraction, cross-posted.
>
> If you're planning to fly behind a stock 1600cc VW engine I think you
> should keep the stock cam. That assumes you're swinging a long,
> efficient prop at 2500 to 3000 rpm. The cam I referred you toward
> does fine on big-bore strokers but does WORSE than the stock cam when
> used on engines having displacement of 120cid or less. (Stock is
> about 96cid; 1834 is about 112.)
>
> If you went ahead and bought the other cam, I'll buy it off you.

Class act. Hopefully you'll catch him in time.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/