Dance on disbaled Bradleys and die!

[Andrew]

This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire. This
applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3652174.stm

Does anyone have the video? (No realvideo format please!)

Andrew

[The Enlightenment]

"Andrew" > wrote in message
...
> This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
> of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
> dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
> yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.

The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged and
fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.

Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled itself
into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
consequences.

The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
babel.

As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.



> This
> applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.

>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3652174.stm
>
> Does anyone have the video? (No realvideo format please!)
>
> Andrew

[Dav1936531]

>From: "The Enlightenment"
>

>>"Andrew" wrote:
>>This applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.

>He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
that looked like at least 25 meters.<

Just an Al-Arabiya reporter detailing the latest Abu al-Zarqawi "victory" to
propagandize the jihad hungry Arab world, that's all. The attackers of the
Bradley were supporters of Abu al-Zarqawi who were hoisting his battle flag
over their "accomplishment" ......knocking out a Bradley.
SEE the pics:

ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly1.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly2.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly3.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly4.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly5.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly6.jpg
ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly7.jpg

Looks like someone was getting real time photo recon of the monkey dance going
on around the Bradley and, when they saw Zarqawi supporters there, ordered up a
rocket hit to police them up.

Zarqawi IS the face of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and it IS open season on Al-Qaeda.
Sorry about any collateral damage, but don't stand next to those Al-Qaeda guys.
They're targets anywhere, anytime.
(previously posted to other thread below)
Dave

[John Mullen]

"The Enlightenment" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Andrew" > wrote in message
> ...
>> This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
>> of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
>> dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
>> yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.
>
> The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
> hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
> and
> fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
> watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.
>
> Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
> itself
> into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
> the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
> consequences.
>
> The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
> and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
> rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
> babel.
>
> As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
> impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.
>
>
>
>> This
>> applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.
>
> He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
> that looked like at least 25 meters.

Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
prevail. Why do they do it?

John

[Scott Ferrin]

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:10:04 +0100, "John Mullen"
> wrote:

>"The Enlightenment" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Andrew" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
>>> of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
>>> dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
>>> yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.
>>
>> The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
>> hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
>> and
>> fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
>> watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.
>>
>> Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
>> itself
>> into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail as
>> the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
>> consequences.
>>
>> The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress, fear
>> and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to the
>> rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
>> babel.
>>
>> As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
>> impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.
>>
>>
>>
>>> This
>>> applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.
>>
>> He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance away
>> that looked like at least 25 meters.
>
>Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
>this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
>prevail. Why do they do it?


why do they take out those who support the opposition? Gee I don't
know, why do you think?

[John Mullen]

"Scott Ferrin" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:10:04 +0100, "John Mullen"
> > wrote:
>
>>"The Enlightenment" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Andrew" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
>>>> of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
>>>> dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
>>>> yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.
>>>
>>> The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express
>>> their
>>> hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged
>>> and
>>> fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
>>> watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.
>>>
>>> Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent. The US stupidly embroiled
>>> itself
>>> into a neocon agitated pro israel/zionist war that must inevitably fail
>>> as
>>> the Arab and Muslim world reject it. Now Americans must suffer the
>>> consequences.
>>>
>>> The US will continue to suffer casualities, growing finacial stress,
>>> fear
>>> and loss of freedoms, perhaps indefinetly, as it sinks in relation to
>>> the
>>> rising powers of the east and dilutes into an immigration driven ethnic
>>> babel.
>>>
>>> As those Reconquista inspired La Razza Mexicans can say with increasing
>>> impuntiy to gringos: Hasta La Vista baby.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> This
>>>> applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush to the scene to gloat.
>>>
>>> He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting from quite a distance
>>> away
>>> that looked like at least 25 meters.
>>
>>Agreed. And deliberately targetting civilians is a new low. Each act like
>>this takes away another possibility that the US invasion force can ever
>>prevail. Why do they do it?
>
>
> why do they take out those who support the opposition? Gee I don't
> know, why do you think?

I think it is because they are stupid and naive. They didn't think through
the post war situation at all. Now the ordinary Iraqis and the troops on the
ground are paying the price.

Killing civilians indiscriminately because you don't like their 'attitude'
takes you to the level of the Nazis in Poland and Russia in WW2. Ask
yourself whether that works in the long term. What do you think?

John

[Matt Wiser]

(Dav1936531) wrote:
>>From: "The Enlightenment"
>
>
>
>>>"Andrew" wrote:
>>>This applies to Arab 'journalists' who rush
>to the scene to gloat.
>
>>He didn't seem to be gloating but was reporting
>from quite a distance away
>that looked like at least 25 meters.<
>
>Just an Al-Arabiya reporter detailing the latest
>Abu al-Zarqawi "victory" to
>propagandize the jihad hungry Arab world, that's
>all. The attackers of the
>Bradley were supporters of Abu al-Zarqawi who
>were hoisting his battle flag
>over their "accomplishment" ......knocking out
>a Bradley.
>SEE the pics:
>
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly1.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly2.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly3.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly4.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly5.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly6.jpg
>ftp://members.aol.com/dav1936531/public/Bradly7.jpg
>
>Looks like someone was getting real time photo
>recon of the monkey dance going
>on around the Bradley and, when they saw Zarqawi
>supporters there, ordered up a
>rocket hit to police them up.
>
>Zarqawi IS the face of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and
>it IS open season on Al-Qaeda.
>Sorry about any collateral damage, but don't
>stand next to those Al-Qaeda guys.
>They're targets anywhere, anytime.
>(previously posted to other thread below)
>Dave
>
>
>
I agree with Dave: any member of AQ, anywhere, is fair game. Again, the
collateral damage is regrettable, but if you run alongside AQ, well, when
they get burned, so do you.Sooner or later, Zarquari is going to cross paths
either with a JDAM or LGB, or the SF operators out looking for him. In the
former case, he gets carried out feet first-assuming there's enough left
to carry out; in the latter, whether or not he gets hauled away in cuffs
or in a body bag is his choice. My preference would be the latter, then pay
your informant the $25 million outstanding on his head.And say goodbye and
good riddance. Oh, and put prices on the heads of his followers as well.
Dead or alive; makes no difference to me-so long as they're out of the game-for
good.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

[Fred the Red Shirt]

"The Enlightenment" > wrote in message >...
> "Andrew" > wrote in message
> ...
> > This is beautiful. People come to celebrate the destruction
> > of a US military vehicle and they die. In my opinion, if you
> > dance around in jubilation at such a seen you are declaring
> > yourself to be an enemy and you invite incoming fire.
>
> The action of jubilantly standing on a destroyed Bradley to express their
> hate for the US occupation forces while the reactive and likely enraged and
> fearfull and possibly vengefull collegues of the Bradley crew may be
> watching on is a dangerous act bordering on stupidity.
>
> Your pro US opinion is pretty irrelevent.

As a US citizen I object to that characterization.

His expressed opinion is anti-humanity and therefor anti-US. Please
do not tar us all with the same brush.

--

FF