Vote, people!

[G.R. Patterson III]

The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
more?

http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

[Bill Denton]

I voted, and those opposed to additional security were ahead by a huge
majority!

But I could not help noticing that the news story surrounding this "poll"
was one of the most biased and sensationalistic stories I have ever seen!

With journalism of this quality it's no surprise that 3/4 ths of America
doesn't have a clue...



"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need
I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

[Paul Tomblin]

In a previous article, "G.R. Patterson III" > said:
>The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
>about light planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's
>needed. Need I say more?
>
>http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

"The plane belonged to Embry-Riddle University. It's one of 70 planes
stolen in the United States since 1999 -- most of them since terrorists
hijacked airliners and used them as missiles on Sept. 11."

Uhhhh - the reason why most of the thefts since 1999 happened *since*
Sept. 11 2001 is because that time period spans under two years before
Sept 11th, and over 2.5 years since. Do the math, brainiacs.


--
Paul Tomblin > http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Never meddle in the affairs of NT. It is slow to boot and quick to crash.
-- Stephen Harris

[Larry Dighera]

On Thu, 13 May 2004 22:51:42 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
> wrote in Message-Id:
>:

>The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
>planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
>more?
>
>http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>

Currently the vote is 79% nay, 21% yea. The American people do
possess common sense after all.

This "small aircraft security" issue is unjustly being employed by the
yellow journalistic media who are attempting to use hoped-for public
hysteria toward General Aviation as a vehicle for driving public
participation in their product. The axis of evil (marketing) rears
its ugly head yet again.


--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,

[Bob Fry]

"G.R. Patterson III" > writes:

> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html

I see the votes are running heavily No (more security not needed), so
I guess that means some reporter will have to work on another, juicier
story.

BTW, in our Friends of University Airport group, our president--who is
very good at working with people--took a reporter and photog from the
local newspaper up for a jaunt prior to our 2nd Annual Open House. We
got a very good writeup in the paper, and now have a contact for the
main mass media source in town. Folks, we gotta play the game....

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote:

> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
> about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I
> say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.


They have a comment link on their website, so we should all respond to
it. BTW, it is not the Orlando paper, but a TV station, channel 2, which
aired the hit piece last night. It wasn't as bad as the CBS piece of
garbage, because they gave perfunctory time to Phil Boyer of AOPA,
unlike CBS, but it was STILL a hit piece!

The vote is running 858 to 210, or 4:1 AGAINSTt heir proposal.

[Scott G.]

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University representative Richard Theokas.....

"Had that person's intent been to load it up with some plastic explosives
and go run it into a federal building or something like that, they might
have been able to do that," Theokas said.

What does he think this statement would accomplish? I think Embry-Riddle
should find someone that thinks before they speak.

Scott G.


"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need
I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

[Cub Driver]

Done.

(At present time, 87 percent of respondents say no :)

On Thu, 13 May 2004 22:51:42 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
> wrote:

>The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles about light
>planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need I say
>more?
>
>http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
>George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org

[Larry Dighera]

On Fri, 14 May 2004 01:43:06 GMT, Orval Fairbairn
> wrote in Message-Id:
>:

>They have a comment link on their website, so we should all respond to
>it. BTW, it is not the Orlando paper, but a TV station, channel 2, which
>aired the hit piece last night. It wasn't as bad as the CBS piece of
>garbage, because they gave perfunctory time to Phil Boyer of AOPA,
>unlike CBS, but it was STILL a hit piece!


Apparently, 'tis the season:


-------------------------------------------------------------
AOPA ePilot Volume 6, Issue 20 May 14, 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------

LOCAL TV STATIONS TARGET GA SECURITY TO BOOST RATINGS
In recent weeks, AOPA has contacted TV stations across the country
after being alerted (usually by members) that they were working on
stories about "lax" security at general aviation airports. The
wave of stories is no coincidence. It's the May "sweeps" period,
that time of year when stations will do anything to get the best
possible ratings. "Don't make it easy for them," said AOPA
President Phil Boyer, a former TV senior executive who knows all
the tricks of the trade. "Take sensible steps to secure your
aircraft. Follow all of the Airport Watch guidelines (
http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=4297 ).
Set up a buddy system to check on the aircraft that is tied down
or hangared near yours. In addition to denying the media
opportunities for stories, you'll also deny unauthorized access to
your aircraft." For more, see (
http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=4298 ).
--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,

[C J Campbell]

"Scott G." > wrote in message
...
> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University representative Richard Theokas.....
>
> "Had that person's intent been to load it up with some plastic explosives
> and go run it into a federal building or something like that, they might
> have been able to do that," Theokas said.
>
> What does he think this statement would accomplish? I think Embry-Riddle
> should find someone that thinks before they speak.

What makes you think they even talked to Theokas? They made up everything
else out of whole cloth, why not the quote?

[OtisWinslow]

I voted. My guess is since the vote ain't going their way it will be pulled
from the online story shortly.

Also someone should have a little discussion with Beau Guest, who it says
runs an aircraft painting business at Leesburg. Seems as though he's
stabbing
us in the back and playing into the hands of the media scum.



"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need
I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

[Larry Dighera]

On Fri, 14 May 2004 13:34:49 GMT, "OtisWinslow"
> wrote in Message-Id:
>:

> My guess is since the vote ain't going their way it will be pulled
>from the online story shortly.

My guess is, that even the negative votes serve as evidence that the
TV station's story generated public interest, and will boost their
ratings. :-(


--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,

[Tom Sixkiller]

"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need
I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

Running 1230 against (85%) vs. 222 for (15%).

[Jay Honeck]

> > With journalism of this quality it's no surprise that 3/4 ths of America
> > doesn't have a clue...
>
> I doubt that it was any better before ...

As opposed to, say, Austrians?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Scott G.]

"C J Campbell" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Scott G." > wrote in message
> ...
> > Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University representative Richard Theokas.....
> >
> > "Had that person's intent been to load it up with some plastic
explosives
> > and go run it into a federal building or something like that, they might
> > have been able to do that," Theokas said.
> >
> > What does he think this statement would accomplish? I think
Embry-Riddle
> > should find someone that thinks before they speak.
>
> What makes you think they even talked to Theokas? They made up everything
> else out of whole cloth, why not the quote?
>
>

Well I guess I don't know much about journalism, lol, you are probably
right.

[Martin Hotze]

On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:23:46 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:

>> > With journalism of this quality it's no surprise that 3/4 ths of America
>> > doesn't have a clue...
>>
>> I doubt that it was any better before ...
>
>As opposed to, say, Austrians?

for sure.
but also opposed to <pick your country of choice>.


martin

--
If John and Peter get together and take money from Paul at gunpoint,
we call it armed robbery. If two thousand voters get together
and decide to take money from another thousand, we call it taxation.
C J Campbell in rec.aviation.piloting

[Jay Honeck]

> >> > With journalism of this quality it's no surprise that 3/4 ths of
America
> >> > doesn't have a clue...
> >>
> >> I doubt that it was any better before ...
> >
> >As opposed to, say, Austrians?
>
> for sure.
> but also opposed to <pick your country of choice>.

No doubt having a huge population means that the U.S. also has a large
number of ignoramuses. People who can't find Austria on a map of the world
are common here, not only because they are ignorant, but because Austria is
irrelevant.

America has accepted your poor, wretched and down-trodden for over 225
years, so the results were inevitable. My family was part of that exodus,
some 160 years ago. It wasn't until my generation that we were able to
attend college, so it took a while for enlightenment to reach the huddled
masses.

But it did come.

That same huge population, however, also means that the U.S. has far more
highly educated, highly informed people than Austria has people.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Bob Noel]

In article <6Dopc.6201$qA.672489@attbi_s51>, "Jay Honeck"
> wrote:

> It wasn't until my generation that we were able to
> attend college, so it took a while for enlightenment to reach the huddled
> masses.

but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
educations lead to enlightenment. Is it difficult to
find courses that "teach" the students some really strange
ideas? ;-)

--
Bob Noel

[Jay Honeck]

> but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
> educations lead to enlightenment.

Agreed.

But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.

And that, in the end, is all you can really hope to achieve in college.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
>
> But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
> broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
> degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
>

But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.

[Jay Honeck]

> But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
> increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.

True enough. My political science professors were all proud, card-carrying
Communists. Capitalism was the absolute bane of all existence, in their
world.

However, that kind of propaganda-laden education ultimately only works on
the weak-minded, and often has precisely the opposite effect on students.

I think the Reagan Revolution was pretty good evidence of that.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
> > but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
> > educations lead to enlightenment.
>
> Agreed.
>
> But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
> broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
> degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
>
> And that, in the end, is all you can really hope to achieve in college.

Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
> >
> > But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
> > broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
> > degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
> >
>
> But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
> increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.

Ah...no, they teach (roughly) that thinking is impotent, reality doesn't
exist and a slew of other noxious "ideas". And it's not the last thirty
years, but more like the 1920's and John Dewey.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:Tfqpc.6568$qA.710144@attbi_s51...
> > But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
> > increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.
>
> True enough. My political science professors were all proud,
card-carrying
> Communists. Capitalism was the absolute bane of all existence, in their
> world.

Uh huh!! And what is the foundation of Economics and Politics as taught in
academia?

> However, that kind of propaganda-laden education ultimately only works on
> the weak-minded, and often has precisely the opposite effect on students.

It works on our youth that receive such indoctrination from elementary
school onward.

Remember the book "Why Johnnie Can't Read"? Now there's another on out "Why
Johnnie Can't Think". Seriously.

> I think the Reagan Revolution was pretty good evidence of that.

What revolution? Increased government by double and re-arranged some, but
other than that...

[Philip Sondericker]

in article , Tom Sixkiller at
wrote on 5/15/04 9:30 AM:

>
> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
>>> but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
>>> educations lead to enlightenment.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
>> broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
>> degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
>>
>> And that, in the end, is all you can really hope to achieve in college.
>
> Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.

Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Philip Sondericker" > wrote in message
...
> in article , Tom Sixkiller at
> wrote on 5/15/04 9:30 AM:
>
> >
> > "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> > news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
> >>> but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
> >>> educations lead to enlightenment.
> >>
> >> Agreed.
> >>
> >> But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
> >> broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
> >> degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
> >>
> >> And that, in the end, is all you can really hope to achieve in college.
> >
> > Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> > programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.
>
> Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?

No.

Is that the worst you can do?

Hey...I hope your descendants can live in the world you've help to create.

[Jay Honeck]

> > Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> > programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.
>
> Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?

Hee hee!

I mean, ahem, that was a cheap shot.

(Sorry, Tom. If it make you feel any better, I screw up apostrophes all the
time, too.)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Philip Sondericker" > wrote in message
...
> in article , Tom Sixkiller at
> wrote on 5/15/04 10:02 AM:
>
> >
> > "Philip Sondericker" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> in article , Tom Sixkiller at
> >> wrote on 5/15/04 9:30 AM:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> >>> news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
> >>>>> but Jay, I suspect some will point out that not all college
> >>>>> educations lead to enlightenment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Agreed.
> >>>>
> >>>> But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education.
The
> >>>> broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal
arts
> >>>> degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and
learn.
> >>>>
> >>>> And that, in the end, is all you can really hope to achieve in
college.
> >>>
> >>> Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> >>> programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.
> >>
> >> Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Is that the worst you can do?
>
> Well, if you're gonna talk about "our wretched education systems"...

Nice to see you can cut right through to essentials.

> >
> > Hey...I hope your descendants can live in the world you've help to
create.
>
> What on earth are you ranting about?

Figure it out...you can do it, you're so brilliant and educated.

Well, here's a hint: 600 years ago, the Arab world was the center on
learning and science.

Okay, bright boy, let's see that brilliance you seem to claim.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:36spc.97884$Ik.7622125@attbi_s53...
> > > Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> > > programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.
> >
> > Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?
>
> Hee hee!
>
> I mean, ahem, that was a cheap shot.
>
> (Sorry, Tom. If it make you feel any better, I screw up apostrophes all
the
> time, too.)

Phil's a punk. I don't worry about his type except that they vote.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:36spc.97884$Ik.7622125@attbi_s53...
> > > Jay, I hate to tell you this but it's the Liberal Art's colleges and
> > > programs that are at the foundation of our wretched education systems.
> >
> > Are they the ones who taught you improper use of apostrophes?
>
> Hee hee!
>
> I mean, ahem, that was a cheap shot.
>
> (Sorry, Tom. If it make you feel any better, I screw up apostrophes all
the
> time, too.)

I really don't think Usenet postings on a Saturday morning are that crucial.

Phil, on the other hand, needs his ego boost any way he can get it.

[Martin Hotze]

On Sat, 15 May 2004 13:08:18 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:

>> for sure.
>> but also opposed to <pick your country of choice>.
>
>No doubt having a huge population means that the U.S. also has a large
>number of ignoramuses.

I referred to a percentage.

> People who can't find Austria on a map of the world
>are common here, not only because they are ignorant, but because Austria is
>irrelevant.

*hehe* you sure got a minor degree in history? how much was it?

>That same huge population, however, also means that the U.S. has far more
>highly educated, highly informed people than Austria has people.

also in percentage? and measured in percentage we here invented far more
than you can imagine. but check a good book on that. it might *gasp*
educate.

#m

--
If John and Peter get together and take money from Paul at gunpoint,
we call it armed robbery. If two thousand voters get together
and decide to take money from another thousand, we call it taxation.
C J Campbell in rec.aviation.piloting

[David Dyer-Bennet]

"Tom Sixkiller" > writes:

> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> news:Tfqpc.6568$qA.710144@attbi_s51...
>> > But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
>> > increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.
>>
>> True enough. My political science professors were all proud,
> card-carrying
>> Communists. Capitalism was the absolute bane of all existence, in their
>> world.
>
> Uh huh!! And what is the foundation of Economics and Politics as taught in
> academia?

Well, the two economics courses I took at Carleton College (where
Prof. Wellstone taught before he got elected to the senate) were based
on mainstream economics of the day, using one of the standard
mainstream texts (Milton Friedman, maybe?).
--
David Dyer-Bennet, >, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/>,<http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>

[David Dyer-Bennet]

"Tom Sixkiller" > writes:

> "Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
>> news:iKppc.97433$Ik.7549843@attbi_s53...
>> >
>> > But that's why I'm a (rare) proponent of a liberal arts education. The
>> > broader (some might say "more useless" :-) education of a liberal arts
>> > degree goes a long way toward teaching one to think, study, and learn.
>> >
>>
>> But over the last thirty years or so a liberal arts "education" has
>> increasingly taught students to "think" only one way.
>
> Ah...no, they teach (roughly) that thinking is impotent, reality doesn't
> exist and a slew of other noxious "ideas". And it's not the last thirty
> years, but more like the 1920's and John Dewey.

Certainly not what I encountered at Carleton College in the 1970s.
Liberal arts education meant a broad base of material, and an emphasis
on critical thinking.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, >, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/>,<http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>

[G.R. Patterson III]

Jay Honeck wrote:
>
> (Sorry, Tom. If it make you feel any better, I screw up apostrophes all the
> time, too.)

Punctuation is very important. There's a big difference between an animal that eats
shoots and leaves and one that eats, shoots, and leaves.

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.

[Jon Woellhaf]

Jay,

Didn't you intend to write "apostrophe's?" <g>

Jay Honeck wrote, "... I screw up apostrophes all the time, too."

[Tom Sixkiller]

"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Jay Honeck wrote:
> >
> > (Sorry, Tom. If it make you feel any better, I screw up apostrophes all
the
> > time, too.)
>
> Punctuation is very important. There's a big difference between an animal
that eats
> shoots and leaves and one that eats, shoots, and leaves.
>
So that's what I was doing wrong -- leave, eat, shoot!! DAMN!!

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Jon Woellhaf" > wrote in message
news:ZKzpc.9496$qA.1009709@attbi_s51...
> Jay,
>
> Didn't you intend to write "apostrophe's?" <g>
>
> Jay Honeck wrote, "... I screw up apostrophes all the time, too."
>
Apostra, aposs, apro...what?

[Shiver Me Timbers]

> Tom Sixkiller > wrote:


> Was it a joke? Or is it a joke NOW that you got caught with your pants down?

You talk too much.

[James Blakely]

Cool, It's up to 1970 votes with 88% saying that security need no
improvement. I also scanned the "Talk to 2" pages and all panned the story.

I had sent them a letter the day after but my comments were not included.

According to AOPA, a smattering of these stories appeared this week because
it's sweeps week.


"G.R. Patterson III" > wrote in message
...
> The Orlando paper has run one of the WE HAVE TO IMPROVE SECURITY articles
about light
> planes. There's a button to allow you to vote on whether it's needed. Need
I say
> more?
>
> http://www.wesh.com/news/3297482/detail.html
>
> George Patterson
> I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.