Boeing and Chi-coms

[Old Geezerr]

Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years ago?

Dave:

[Miloch]

In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>
>
> Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
> manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years ago?
>
>Dave:
>
>

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-china/boeing-opens-first-737-plant-in-china-amid-u-s-sino-trade-war-idUSKBN1OE06C



*

[Old Geezerr]

On 14 Oct 2019 21:08:20 -0700, Miloch >
wrote:

>In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>>
>>
>> Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
>> manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years ago?
>>
>>Dave:
>>
>>
>
>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-china/boeing-opens-first-737-plant-in-china-amid-u-s-sino-trade-war-idUSKBN1OE06C
>
>
>
>*That article only talks about outfitting interiors and the like. What I read about was the assembly and manufacturer of airframe
sections.

Dave:

[Miloch]

In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>
>On 14 Oct 2019 21:08:20 -0700, Miloch >
>wrote:
>
>>In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
>>> manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years ago?
>>>
>>>Dave:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-china/boeing-opens-first-737-plant-in-china-amid-u-s-sino-trade-war-idUSKBN1OE06C
>>
>>
>>
>>*That article only talks about outfitting interiors and the like. What I read
>>about was the assembly and manufacturer of airframe
> sections.
>
>Dave:
>
>

Interiors are important, Geez...unless you assume it's OK to lash the passengers
to wooden pallets, fork-lift them in and secure them in place with ropes for the
duration of the flight.

....that might be OK for those travelling in 'economy class' but first class
passengers wouldn't stand for it!!!



*

[Old Geezerr]

On 15 Oct 2019 21:31:27 -0700, Miloch >
wrote:

>In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>>
>>On 14 Oct 2019 21:08:20 -0700, Miloch >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article >, Old Geezerr says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
>>>> manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years ago?
>>>>
>>>>Dave:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-china/boeing-opens-first-737-plant-in-china-amid-u-s-sino-trade-war-idUSKBN1OE06C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>*That article only talks about outfitting interiors and the like. What I read
>>>about was the assembly and manufacturer of airframe
>> sections.
>>
>>Dave:
>>
>>
>
>Interiors are important, Geez...unless you assume it's OK to lash the passengers
>to wooden pallets, fork-lift them in and secure them in place with ropes for the
>duration of the flight.
>
>...that might be OK for those travelling in 'economy class' but first class
>passengers wouldn't stand for it!!!
>
>
>
My original post was about the fact that we passed the equipment
and technology to manufacture large airframes to the Chi-coms.
That plus technology theft was able to increase their capabilities
against us.

Dave:

[Mitchell Holman[_9_]]

Old Geezerr > wrote in
:

> On 15 Oct 2019 21:31:27 -0700, Miloch >
> wrote:
>
>>In article >, Old Geezerr
>>says...
>>>
>>>On 14 Oct 2019 21:08:20 -0700, Miloch >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article >, Old Geezerr
>>>>says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Didn't Boeing provide China with equipment and technology for
>>>>> manufacturing large, i.e 747 size, airframes a bunch of years
>>>>> ago?
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-china/boeing-opens-first-73
>>>>7-plant-in-china-amid-u-s-sino-trade-war-idUSKBN1OE06C
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>*That article only talks about outfitting interiors and the like.
>>>>What I read about was the assembly and manufacturer of airframe
>>> sections.
>>>
>>>Dave:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Interiors are important, Geez...unless you assume it's OK to lash the
>>passengers to wooden pallets, fork-lift them in and secure them in
>>place with ropes for the duration of the flight.
>>
>>...that might be OK for those travelling in 'economy class' but first
>>class passengers wouldn't stand for it!!!
>>
>>
>>
> My original post was about the fact that we passed the equipment
> and technology to manufacture large airframes to the Chi-coms.
> That plus technology theft was able to increase their capabilities
> against us.



"When it comes time to hang the
capitalists they will sell us the
rope to do it with"
Lenin.