Re: Mandatory 100hr checks - when? Also Dry Lease

[Dave S]

A "dry lease" is a business decision, not a regulatory requirement.

Dave

Peter wrote:
> Gene Kearns > wrote
>
>
>>>I have checked with the authorities and they say
>>>it is nonsense.
>>
>>Unclear. What more information do you need? If you are shopping for an
>>opinion which supports you position, what weight would it carry?
>
>
> Regarding the renting, I was looking for a FAR reference I could look
> up, but it is clear enough there isn't one. This has become yet
> another tale which gets repeated by enough people...
>
> Regarding the dry lease requirement, nobody has come up with a reason
> for that either (here or elsewhere).
>
> Thank you all.
>
>
> Peter.
> --
> Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
> E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y.
> Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.

[Dave S]

Again.. practical "need" is not a "legal requirement". Maybe the lawyer
wanted the business of drawing the lease up or something.. or was
protecting his turf in doing that sort of business.

Dave

Peter wrote:

> Dave S > wrote
>
>
>>A "dry lease" is a business decision, not a regulatory requirement.
>
>
> That I can understand. What is bizzare is that I have heard from a
> person who says he is a qualified NY lawyer state that the need for a
> dry lease comes from some sort of interaction between the FAR
> requirements and renting an aircraft outside the USA.
>
>
> Peter.
> --
> Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
> E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y.
> Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.