MRB DP NOTAM

[[email protected]]

NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).

[Michael 182]

Is there a question or comment here?

Michael

> wrote in message ...
> NOTAM issued today:
>
> USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
> STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
> NM
> TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
> HEADING
> 080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
> R-019
> TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
> VIA
> HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
> LDN
> R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
> CLIMB
> VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
> OR
> (ASSIGNED ROUTE).
>
>

[John R. Copeland]

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.
---JRC---

"Michael 182" > wrote in message =
news:dpI3c.224440$jk2.924040@attbi_s53...
> Is there a question or comment here?
>=20
> Michael
>=20
> > wrote in message =
...
> > NOTAM issued today:
> >
> > USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
> > STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT =
PER
> > NM
> > TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
> > HEADING
> > 080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
> > R-019
> > TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: =
CLIMB
> > VIA
> > HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, =
INTERCEPT
> > LDN
> > R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY =
26:
> > CLIMB
> > VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA =
(TRANSITION)
> > OR
> > (ASSIGNED ROUTE).
> >
> >
>=20
>

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"John R. Copeland" > wrote in message
...
>
> Yes, and that was it.
> You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.
>

There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the NOTAM
was the first message in the thread.

[John R. Copeland]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message =
hlink.net...
>=20
> "John R. Copeland" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Yes, and that was it.
> > You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.
> >
>=20
> There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the =
NOTAM
> was the first message in the thread.
>=20
>=20
Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new =
one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(
---JRC---

[Peter R.]

Michael 182 ) wrote:

> Is there a question or comment here?

I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
description.

After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"John R. Copeland" > wrote in message
...
>
> Mea Culpa, Steven.
> I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new
one.
> I'll do penance, I promise. :-(
>

Go out on the ramp, face Kill Devil Hill, kneel, and recite the poem "High
Flight" three times. Then go forth and sin no more.

[John R. Copeland]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message =
hlink.net...
>=20
> "John R. Copeland" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Mea Culpa, Steven.
> > I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a =
new
> one.
> > I'll do penance, I promise. :-(
> >
>=20
> Go out on the ramp, face Kill Devil Hill, kneel, and recite the poem =
"High
> Flight" three times. Then go forth and sin no more.
>=20
>=20

Making the sign of the cross, and reciting slowly and solemnly:
"Omni, Omni, Tacan, DME."
---JRC---

[[email protected]]

Michael 182 wrote:

> Is there a question or comment here?

No. You apparently didn't follow the extensive thread about this a couple of
weeks ago.

[[email protected]]

"Peter R." wrote:

> Michael 182 ) wrote:
>
> > Is there a question or comment here?
>
> I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
> Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
> description.
>
> After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
> the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.
>

Correct. Since old threads die around here, I posted it anew.

[Michael 182]

Missed it. Thanks.

Michael

> wrote in message ...
>
>
> Michael 182 wrote:
>
> > Is there a question or comment here?
>
> No. You apparently didn't follow the extensive thread about this a couple
of
> weeks ago.
>

[Richard Kaplan]

Thanks....

Now if only how I could figure how to get an instrument approach to KWAY
published this efficiently and easily. (They have agreed to design it;
apparently "expedited" aproaches take 12-18 months however.)

--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com

[[email protected]]

Richard Kaplan wrote:

> Thanks....
>
> Now if only how I could figure how to get an instrument approach to KWAY
> published this efficiently and easily. (They have agreed to design it;
> apparently "expedited" aproaches take 12-18 months however.)

Getting a NOTAM to fix a defect on an existing procedure is easy. Getting a
new procedure is tough. If you get one in 12 months from the original
request, you are moving at light speed.