Mike Moore is a fat tub of ****

[JJ]

[Richard Hertz]

You got that right - and if possible, is an understatement.

"JJ" > wrote in message
...
>

[Tom Sixkiller]

"JJ" > wrote in message
...

Get off the fence and tell us what you REALLY think! :~)

[smackey]

Why?

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"smackey" > wrote in message
...
>
> Why?
>

Probably due to his eating habits.

[Richard Hertz]

Added to his lack of exercise and his socialist/communist lazy mindset that
people are entitled to free stuff from the gubment/other people/corporations
it is quite plain why he is a fat tub of poop.

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "smackey" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Why?
> >
>
> Probably due to his eating habits.
>
>

[Nathan Young]

On Tue, 18 May 2004 17:18:28 -0400, JJ > wrote:

Maybe so, but 'Roger and Me' is a hilarious movie... I haven't cared
for his works since then...

-Nathan

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Nathan Young" > wrote in message
...
>
> Maybe so, but 'Roger and Me' is a hilarious movie...
>

I didn't realize it was intended to be a comedy.

[Richard Hertz]

It is hilarious in its puerile misunderstandings of economics, his
ridiculous harassment of individuals and his arrogance, ignorance and
stupidity.



"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Nathan Young" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Maybe so, but 'Roger and Me' is a hilarious movie...
> >
>
> I didn't realize it was intended to be a comedy.
>
>

[Michael 182]

This could be interesting...

http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com/

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Richard Hertz" > wrote in message
et...
>
> It is hilarious in its puerile misunderstandings of economics,
> his ridiculous harassment of individuals and his arrogance,
> ignorance and stupidity.
>

I see. So he unknowingly made a comedy.

[Defly]

As I understand it, Moore's understanding of economics is based on his UAW
membership while he worked at the GM plant in Flint MI. It is understandable
that his economic leanings would be so far left as to be described as
neo-socialism.

>It is hilarious in its puerile misunderstandings of economics, his
>ridiculous harassment of individuals and his arrogance, ignorance and
>stupidity.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Defly" > wrote in message
...
>
> As I understand it, Moore's understanding of economics is based
> on his UAW membership while he worked at the GM plant in Flint
> MI.
>

Which is to say he has no understanding of economics.

Actually, I'm rather surprised to learn that Moore had ever done any
productive work.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Richard Hertz" > wrote in message
> et...
> >
> > It is hilarious in its puerile misunderstandings of economics,
> > his ridiculous harassment of individuals and his arrogance,
> > ignorance and stupidity.
> >
>
> I see. So he unknowingly made a comedy.
>
Quite! He does documentaries the way Saturday Night Live did documentaries.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Defly" > wrote in message
...
> As I understand it, Moore's understanding of economics is based on his UAW
> membership while he worked at the GM plant in Flint MI. It is
understandable
> that his economic leanings would be so far left as to be described as
> neo-socialism.
>

Neo?

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Tom Sixkiller" > wrote in message
...
>
> Quite! He does documentaries the way Saturday Night Live
> did documentaries.
>

Oh, no, Michael Moore does not make documentary films at all. Michael Moore
makes propaganda films.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Tom Sixkiller" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Quite! He does documentaries the way Saturday Night Live
> > did documentaries.
> >
>
> Oh, no, Michael Moore does not make documentary films at all. Michael
Moore
> makes propaganda films.
>
Oh, pick, pick, pick!!!

[Thomas Borchert]

Richard,

what is this? A test about how low this newsgroup can possibly go?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

[Richard Hertz]

One never knows what his agenda really is - he lies and deceives. I can
only assume though that he intended to make a political statement with some
of his ideas of humor and irony thrown in. He just doesn't get the real
joke - which is him and his point of view and his deceitful, ill-conceived
methods.


"Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Richard Hertz" > wrote in message
> et...
> >
> > It is hilarious in its puerile misunderstandings of economics,
> > his ridiculous harassment of individuals and his arrogance,
> > ignorance and stupidity.
> >
>
> I see. So he unknowingly made a comedy.
>
>

[Richard Hertz]

I didn't start the thread. Not sure why it was posted, just agreeing with
the poster.

"Thomas Borchert" > wrote in message
...
> Richard,
>
> what is this? A test about how low this newsgroup can possibly go?
>
> --
> Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
>

[Tom Sixkiller]

"Richard Hertz" > wrote in message
. net...
> I didn't start the thread. Not sure why it was posted, just agreeing with
> the poster.
>
> "Thomas Borchert" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Richard,
> >
> > what is this? A test about how low this newsgroup can possibly go?

Somebody (A Moore fan) got a whomp in the face from reality and they're
throwing a tantrum.

[Robert M. Gary]

JJ > wrote in message >...


He sure seems to hate large companies, at least until it comes time to
sign his book deals, his movie deals, etc. Common man my ass. I love
the Charlton Heston interview he did about Columbine High School. He
edited the interview to remove the context. He also showed Heston
giving speeches about bringing the NRA to Columbine. Of course, he
forgot to tell you that these speeches were given BEFORE the high
school incident.

-Robert

[Bonham]

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

> Oh, no, Michael Moore does not make documentary films at all. Michael Moore
> makes propaganda films.

Mr. McNicoll,

Correct. Michael Moore's films are not documentary. They certainly
convey his political opinion. By the strictest definition, they are
propaganda films.

However, films now (and always) are/were either fiction or
"documentary". Fiction films depict the imaginary propagandising of
the creator. Similarly, current "documentary" films only represent a
more blatant and obvious form of propaganda.

Therefore, all films are propaganda, the systematic propagation of a
doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests
of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.

Your statement is moot and obvious. Films and all other public
commentary must only project opinions based on the subjective
experience of the author.

For more information on subjectivity, consult your nearest Heidegger
or Husserl text.

By the way, both of our posts are also propaganda. So, don't take me
seriously. And I won't take you seriously either ; )

Raspberries and Regards,

Bonham