TLP 2006-5 19

[vincent jacques]

--
VINCENT Jacques
0479/458615
BELGIUM
Welcome to www.florennes-as.be

[Mechanical Menace]

"vincent jacques" > wrote in news:456d83ee$0$31470
:

>
>

Pardon me for not knowing that much about modern jets, but is that a black
stain in front of the fin, or is it part of the camo.
If it's a stain, what caused it.

TIA,

Dennis

[alf blume]

Hello, Mechanical!
You wrote on 29 Nov 2006 16:43:11 GMT:

MM> Pardon me for not knowing that much about modern jets, but is that a
MM> black stain in front of the fin, or is it part of the camo.
MM> If it's a stain, what caused it.

The trust reversers . . .

[adelsonsl]

WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.

--
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
> preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
> shouting
> "...Holy ****...what a ride!"

Ooooo
( ) 0oooo
\ ( ( )
\ _) ) / DIRTY FeaT
(_ /
All my friends were strangers once........some of them are still pretty
strange

[Mechanical Menace]

"adelsonsl" > wrote in news:hykbh.1359$Lm4.1119
@newsfe19.lga:

> WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.
>

I already thought so, by the look of it, but didn't know these jets had
them too.
Thinking about it, I shouldn't know why these jets should NOT have thrust
reversers.

Thanx for explaining.

Cheers,

Dennis

[Hans Holbein]

Mechanical Menace schrieb:
> "adelsonsl" > wrote in news:hykbh.1359$Lm4.1119
> @newsfe19.lga:
>
>
>>WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.
>>
>
>
> I already thought so, by the look of it, but didn't know these jets had
> them too.

Some do. The demand was a multirole feighter for short strips or
motorway strips, in case the airfields became destroyed.
This is a cold war design to be operated within closest range to combat
zone (eg. cold war Germany).

> Thinking about it, I shouldn't know why these jets should NOT have thrust
> reversers.
>
On more system to raise costs per unit, one more system to maintain, one
more system to fail, and so on...

[No Name]

If you are going to take that attitude (efficiency), then you will eliminate
war, and the military altogether.

"Hans Holbein" > wrote in message
...
<SNIP>
> On more system to raise costs per unit, one more system to maintain, one
> more system to fail, and so on...