TLP 2006-5 19

--
VINCENT Jacques
0479/458615
BELGIUM
Welcome to www.florennes-as.be

"vincent jacques" wrote in news:456d83ee$0$31470
:




Pardon me for not knowing that much about modern jets, but is that a black
stain in front of the fin, or is it part of the camo.
If it's a stain, what caused it.

TIA,

Dennis

Hello, Mechanical!
You wrote on 29 Nov 2006 16:43:11 GMT:

MM Pardon me for not knowing that much about modern jets, but is that a
MM black stain in front of the fin, or is it part of the camo.
MM If it's a stain, what caused it.

The trust reversers . . .

WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.

--
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
shouting
"...Holy ****...what a ride!"

Ooooo
( ) 0oooo
\ ( ( )
\ _) ) / DIRTY FeaT
(_ /
All my friends were strangers once........some of them are still pretty
strange

"adelsonsl" wrote in news:hykbh.1359$Lm4.1119
@newsfe19.lga:

WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.


I already thought so, by the look of it, but didn't know these jets had
them too.
Thinking about it, I shouldn't know why these jets should NOT have thrust
reversers.

Thanx for explaining.

Cheers,

Dennis

Mechanical Menace schrieb:
"adelsonsl" wrote in news:hykbh.1359$Lm4.1119
@newsfe19.lga:


WRONG AGAIN ALF ITS SPELLED THRUST REVERSERS.



I already thought so, by the look of it, but didn't know these jets had
them too.

Some do. The demand was a multirole feighter for short strips or
motorway strips, in case the airfields became destroyed.
This is a cold war design to be operated within closest range to combat
zone (eg. cold war Germany).

Thinking about it, I shouldn't know why these jets should NOT have thrust
reversers.

On more system to raise costs per unit, one more system to maintain, one
more system to fail, and so on...