Re: Hitting airliner with rifle round? [was: PK of Igla vs. airliner]

[B2431]

>You need to come out and I'll arrange a 50 cal demonstration in Fresno.
>Bring $4,000 and I'll help you take one of the 10 shot semi-autos home.
>Well, maybe $5,000 by now. All laws local and federal apply.
>

Tarver, if you are suggesting making a straw purchase I advise you it is
illegal. As an FFL holder I would be required to notify ATF if I thought you
were serious.

Dan. U. S. Air Force, retired

[Tarver Engineering]

"B2431" > wrote in message
...
> >You need to come out and I'll arrange a 50 cal demonstration in Fresno.
> >Bring $4,000 and I'll help you take one of the 10 shot semi-autos home.
> >Well, maybe $5,000 by now. All laws local and federal apply.
> >
>
> Tarver, if you are suggesting making a straw purchase I advise you it is
> illegal. As an FFL holder I would be required to notify ATF if I thought
you
> were serious.

Bugger off retard.

It is little wonder USAF tossed you out at 12, Dan.

[B2431]

>Bugger off retard.
>
Grow up.

>It is little wonder USAF tossed you out at 12, Dan.
>
Prove it.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

[Tarver Engineering]

"B2431" > wrote in message
...
> >Bugger off retard.
> >
> Grow up.
>
> >It is little wonder USAF tossed you out at 12, Dan.
> >
> Prove it.

You already did, Dan. I'd have to **** can you too, as your CO, had I
stayed in.

[Jim Yanik]

(B2431) wrote in
:

>>From: "Tarver Engineering"
>>Date: 8/18/2003 12:39 PM Central Daylight Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
>>
>>"B2431" > wrote in message
...
>>> >Bugger off retard.
>>> >
>>> Grow up.
>>>
>>> >It is little wonder USAF tossed you out at 12, Dan.
>>> >
>>> Prove it.
>>
>>You already did, Dan. I'd have to **** can you too, as your CO, had I
>>stayed in.
>
> Tarver, I did my 20 in the Air Force. You haven't proved otherwise.
>
> I'm sorry you feel the need to defend yourself with personal attacks.
> I have been nothing but civil to you and you have proved incapable of
> doing the same in return.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
>

I still do not know why anyone responds to Tarver.
It just encourages him.

--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
remove null to contact me

[John R Weiss]

"Jim Yanik" > wrote...
>
> I still do not know why anyone responds to Tarver.

Occasionally it is a good idea to expose his baseless rantings for the BS they
are, just so the newbies and lurkers who joined since the last debunking don't
take him seriously.

Besides, in the last exercise, even I was amazed at the amount of easily-found
information that was available to disprove his allegations!

[Jim Knoyle]

"John R Weiss" > wrote in message
news:5Cg0b.189197$o%2.89968@sccrnsc02...
> "Jim Yanik" > wrote...
> >
> > I still do not know why anyone responds to Tarver.
>
> Occasionally it is a good idea to expose his baseless rantings for the BS
they
> are, just so the newbies and lurkers who joined since the last debunking
don't
> take him seriously.
>

My sentiments exactly. :-)

> Besides, in the last exercise, even I was amazed at the amount of
easily-found
> information that was available to disprove his allegations!
>

Yep, and I was really surprised that, disregarding the hi tech, whiz bang
triple triple rendundancy, the 777 has the same instrumentation plumbing
as the 707. At least on paper.
JK
http://http--euler.ecs.umass.edu-ece655-boeing777.ppt/

[Tarver Engineering]

"John R Weiss" > wrote in message
news:5Cg0b.189197$o%2.89968@sccrnsc02...
> "Jim Yanik" > wrote...
> >
> > I still do not know why anyone responds to Tarver.
>
> Occasionally it is a good idea to expose his baseless rantings for the BS
they
> are, just so the newbies and lurkers who joined since the last debunking
don't
> take him seriously.

Weiss has almost all his serious debates at ram with me.

I find it excellent that ram's two heaviest hitters do so.

John P. Tarver, MS/PE
Electrical Engineer