Re: Heroin production in on the rise in Afaganistan

[Tarver Engineering]

"Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
om...
> http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
>
> general Alexander Markin, the commander of russian border guard in
Tajikistan.
>
> "question: it is possible to make a conclusion from what you said that
> US has no interests in destroying of mass heroin production infrastructure
> in Afganistan? And what narcobusiness is somehow connected with
> US economy?
>
> gen. Markin: On that question I would better answer without microphone.
> With microphone I can say only that according to our data, during
> antiterroristic operation in Afganistan US forces did not destroy a single
> laboratory for heroin production. They even never mentioned about
> that."

Not true, the US Military defined opiate production as a non-military target
very early on in the Afghan campaign. The poppys will just move back to
burma and then we can't decide who gets to distribute heroin.

[Tarver Engineering]

"Keith Willshaw" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> om...
> > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> >
>
> Cut it out Michael
>
> This is off topic for ALL the groups you crossposted too.
>
> You are getting very class to being killfiled by a lot of people
> as a troll.

Very funny, Keith, but how can a cut and post troll like yourself admonish
Michael?

[captain!]

"Keith Willshaw" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> om...
> > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> >
>
> Cut it out Michael
>
> This is off topic for ALL the groups you crossposted too.
>
> You are getting very class to being killfiled by a lot of people
> as a troll.
>
> Keith
>
>

does this mean that you two have called off the wedding?
where did the love go?

[captain!]

"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> om...
> > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> >
> > general Alexander Markin, the commander of russian border guard in
> Tajikistan.
> >
> > "question: it is possible to make a conclusion from what you said that
> > US has no interests in destroying of mass heroin production
infrastructure
> > in Afganistan? And what narcobusiness is somehow connected with
> > US economy?
> >
> > gen. Markin: On that question I would better answer without microphone.
> > With microphone I can say only that according to our data, during
> > antiterroristic operation in Afganistan US forces did not destroy a
single
> > laboratory for heroin production. They even never mentioned about
> > that."
>
> Not true, the US Military defined opiate production as a non-military
target
> very early on in the Afghan campaign. The poppys will just move back to
> burma and then we can't decide who gets to distribute heroin.
>
>

a pleasantly honest answer.

[Keith Willshaw]

"Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
m...
> "Keith Willshaw" > wrote in message
>...
> > "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> > om...
> > > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> > >
> >
> > Cut it out Michael
> >
> > This is off topic for ALL the groups you crossposted too.
>
> Disagree. highly ON topic for ALL the groups.
>
> >
> > You are getting very class to being killfiled by a lot of people
> > as a troll.
>
> Do you really think I care about anyones opinions, particularly yours
Keith?
>

No I dont think you do but speaking with nobody listening
is a singularly futile exercise

Keith

[Joey Bishop]

Who gives a ****.

[Michael Petukhov]

"Keith Willshaw" > wrote in message >...
> "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> m...
> > "Keith Willshaw" > wrote in message
> >...
> > > "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> > > om...
> > > > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cut it out Michael
> > >
> > > This is off topic for ALL the groups you crossposted too.
> >
> > Disagree. highly ON topic for ALL the groups.
> >
> > >
> > > You are getting very class to being killfiled by a lot of people
> > > as a troll.
> >
> > Do you really think I care about anyones opinions, particularly yours
> Keith?
> >
>
> No I dont think you do but speaking with nobody listening
> is a singularly futile exercise
>

Fortunately Keith you are always around.

Michael

> Keith

[Aida Lott]

....and no matter how much they produce, they will find eager buyers in
Russia.


"Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
om...
> http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
>
> general Alexander Markin, the commander of russian border guard in
Tajikistan.
>
> "question: it is possible to make a conclusion from what you said that
> US has no interests in destroying of mass heroin production infrastructure
> in Afganistan? And what narcobusiness is somehow connected with
> US economy?
>
> gen. Markin: On that question I would better answer without microphone.
> With microphone I can say only that according to our data, during
> antiterroristic operation in Afganistan US forces did not destroy a single
> laboratory for heroin production. They even never mentioned about
> that."

[Michael Petukhov]

"Aida Lott" > wrote in message >...

> ...and no matter how much they produce, they will find eager buyers in
> Russia.
>

Since clearly the author of this so to speak reply is not going
to apologize for that **** I am wondering is there anybody else
here who feel necessary to do it instead of Mr./Mrs. Aida Lott?

Michael

>
> "Michael Petukhov" > wrote in message
> om...
> > http://nvo.ng.ru/wars/2003-08-29/1_geroin.html (in russian)
> >
> > general Alexander Markin, the commander of russian border guard in
> Tajikistan.
> >
> > "question: it is possible to make a conclusion from what you said that
> > US has no interests in destroying of mass heroin production infrastructure
> > in Afganistan? And what narcobusiness is somehow connected with
> > US economy?
> >
> > gen. Markin: On that question I would better answer without microphone.
> > With microphone I can say only that according to our data, during
> > antiterroristic operation in Afganistan US forces did not destroy a single
> > laboratory for heroin production. They even never mentioned about
> > that."

[Tarver Engineering]

"Aida Lott" > wrote in message
et...
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3182891.stm


BBC?

Bwahahahahaha

[Simon Johanson]

"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
...
:
: "Aida Lott" > wrote in message
: et...
: >
: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3182891.stm
:
:
: BBC?
:
: Bwahahahahaha


Tarver?

Bwahahahahahahahaha!


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003

[Tarver Engineering]

"Simon Johanson" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
> ...
> :
> : "Aida Lott" > wrote in message
> : et...
> : >
> : > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3182891.stm
> :
> :
> : BBC?
> :
> : Bwahahahahaha
>
>
> Tarver?

BBC has no credibility WRT the war. BBC have been caught red handed
altering articles for ploitical purposes and probably out and out lying in
another article. BBC make the NY Times look honest.

[Aida Lott]

"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Simon Johanson" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > :
> > : "Aida Lott" > wrote in message
> > : et...
> > : >
> > : > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3182891.stm
> > :
> > :
> > : BBC?
> > :
> > : Bwahahahahaha
> >
> >
> > Tarver?
>
> BBC has no credibility WRT the war. BBC have been caught red handed
> altering articles for ploitical purposes and probably out and out lying in
> another article. BBC make the NY Times look honest.
>
>

So prove that they are lying about Afghan heroine going to Russia.

[Tarver Engineering]

"Aida Lott" > wrote in message
et...
>
> "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Simon Johanson" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > > "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > :
> > > : "Aida Lott" > wrote in message
> > > : et...
> > > : >
> > > : > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3182891.stm
> > > :
> > > :
> > > : BBC?
> > > :
> > > : Bwahahahahaha

> > > Tarver?
> >
> > BBC has no credibility WRT the war. BBC have been caught red handed
> > altering articles for ploitical purposes and probably out and out lying
in
> > another article. BBC make the NY Times look honest.

> So prove that they are lying about Afghan heroine going to Russia.

Afghan heroin is going to Russia, as it has been for 20 years. In the mid
90's you couldn't go to an airport there without seeing the heroin addicts
sleeping there. In fact, at the time the US invaded Kosovo, 80% of the drug
dealers in Russian prisons were Albanians selling Afghan heroin.

It is the interest of the US to prevent al Qaeda from distributing heroin,
thereby cutting their funding. The Russians and the BBC can bugger off.