View Full Version : Civilian A-4 Fighters in AZ
DavidG35
November 15th 03, 03:08 AM
Anyone know the name of the company that flys A-4s as agressors near
phoenix?
Thanks,
GMAN
Errol Cavit
November 16th 03, 07:14 AM
"DavidG35" > wrote in message
news:wEgtb.10377$Q64.9186@fed1read03...
> Anyone know the name of the company that flys A-4s as agressors near
> phoenix?
Fairly sure its these folks.
Advanced Training Systems International
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/latestnewsstory.cfm?storyID=3524348
They might have a branch in Oz before too long.
--
Errol Cavit |
I've heard a tape of collected kakapo noises, and it's almost impossible to
believe that it all just comes from a bird, or indeed any kind of animal.
Pink Floyd studio out-takes perhaps, but not a parrot.
Douglas Adams, _Last Chance to See_
Ditch
November 16th 03, 08:15 PM
>> Anyone know the name of the company that flys A-4s as agressors near
>> phoenix?
http://www.atsifightertraining.com/
There be their website.
-John
*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
American*
MLenoch
November 16th 03, 09:21 PM
>-John
>*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
>American*
What about Republic?
VL
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
November 16th 03, 09:56 PM
MLenoch wrote:
>> -John
>> *You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman
>> or North American*
>
> What about Republic?
Cessna?
--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
http://www.mortimerschnerd.com
Ditch
November 17th 03, 12:37 AM
>What about Republic?
what about them?
-John
*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
American*
Ditch
November 17th 03, 12:37 AM
>Cessna?
No...
-John
*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
American*
B2431
November 17th 03, 12:50 AM
>From: (Ditch)
>Date: 11/16/2003 6:37 PM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: >
>
>>What about Republic?
>
>what about them?
They made good movies during WW2.
Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
>
>-John
>*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
>American*
>
>
>
>
>
>
MLenoch
November 17th 03, 02:02 AM
>>>What about Republic?
>>
>>what about them?
P-47 is a nice flying airplane. In some regards, nicer than a P-51 or F6F.
VL
Ditch
November 17th 03, 03:43 AM
>P-47 is a nice flying airplane. In some regards, nicer than a P-51 or F6F.
I agree...the -47 is one baddass MoFo.
-John
*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
American*
Harry Andreas
November 18th 03, 12:56 AM
In article >,
(MLenoch) wrote:
> >>>What about Republic?
> >>
> >>what about them?
>
> P-47 is a nice flying airplane. In some regards, nicer than a P-51 or F6F.
> VL
I would think a lot more expensive to fly, though.
Whot?
--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
MLenoch
November 18th 03, 01:58 AM
>> >>>What about Republic?
>> >>
>> >>what about them?
>>
>> P-47 is a nice flying airplane. In some regards, nicer than a P-51 or F6F.
>> VL
>
>I would think a lot more expensive to fly, though.
>Whot?
Yup, R-2800 @ 80 to 90 gph vs. a Merlin's 60 gph.
VL
Dale
November 18th 03, 08:33 AM
In article >,
(Harry Andreas) wrote:
> In article >,
> (MLenoch) wrote:
>
> > >>>What about Republic?
> > >>
> > >>what about them?
> >
> > P-47 is a nice flying airplane. In some regards, nicer than a P-51 or F6F.
> > VL
>
> I would think a lot more expensive to fly, though.
> Whot?
Nah, they all take the same amount of money to operate......ALL OF IT.
--
Dale L. Falk
There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.
http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.