US to restart nuke testing ...congress signs bill...

[MeganJ]

People start to worry again ...the US is restarting nuclear war tests or
something..

Bush has been allowed by congress to start resumption of nuclear tests.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1001740.htm

End of world is not far away now.

Cheerio

Megz

[No Spam!]

MeganJ wrote:
> People start to worry again ...the US is restarting nuclear war tests or
> something..
> Bush has been allowed by congress to start resumption of nuclear tests.
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1001740.htm
> End of world is not far away now.
> Cheerio
> Megz

Did you even read the article? Or did you not understand what you read?

Monies allocated for 'study of' (not 'test of') new and smaller weapons;
monies allocated to prep the test area.

No monies allocated to do any actual testing. The current status would
require 36 months to reconstitute the site; Bush wanted to take it down
to 18 and the US Congress compromised on 24.

This doesn't look like "restarting nuclear war tests" [sic] to me. And
just exactly what is a "nuclear war test'? I know what a 'nuclear
weapons test' is, but I'm not too sure what constitutes a "nuclear war
test". Any suggestions?

[Tarver Engineering]

"No Spam!" > wrote in message
...
> MeganJ wrote:
> > People start to worry again ...the US is restarting nuclear war tests or
something..
> > Bush has been allowed by congress to start resumption of nuclear tests.
> > http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1001740.htm
> > End of world is not far away now.
> > Cheerio
> > Megz
>
> Did you even read the article? Or did you not understand what you read?
>
> Monies allocated for 'study of' (not 'test of') new and smaller weapons;
> monies allocated to prep the test area.

It is nice to have the area maintained.

> No monies allocated to do any actual testing. The current status would
> require 36 months to reconstitute the site; Bush wanted to take it down
> to 18 and the US Congress compromised on 24.

That is a lot less interesting than a proclomation that "the end is near".

> This doesn't look like "restarting nuclear war tests" [sic] to me. And
> just exactly what is a "nuclear war test'? I know what a 'nuclear
> weapons test' is, but I'm not too sure what constitutes a "nuclear war
> test". Any suggestions?

Wouldn't that be where the US nukes another nuclear power?

[John Keeney]

"MeganJ" > wrote in message
...
> People start to worry again ...the US is restarting nuclear war tests or
> something..
>
> Bush has been allowed by congress to start resumption of nuclear tests.
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1001740.htm
>
> End of world is not far away now.

My, what an exceedingly clueless message.
"Nuclear war tests", "or something..", "End of world..."
Did you manage it under the influence of some chemical
or other? Or was it perhaps the product of natural ability?

[tscottme]

MeganJ > wrote in message
...

>
> End of world is not far away now.
>

Panic early and avoid the rush!

--

Scott
--------
Monitor the latest efforts of "peaceful Muslims" at
http://www.jihadwatch.org/