Re: Bush admits he wanted regime change before 11 September

[B2431]

>From: "George Z. Bush"

>
>The significance of that glitch is that he must have been speaking with
>forked tongue during his election campaign, which meant that he was willing to
lie to the voters in order to earn their support. And if that's not true, then
he's
>lying now in claiming an early need for regime change in Iraq.
>
>It's got to be one or the other.....you can't have it both ways.
>Truthfulness does not seem to be one of our President's virtues.
>
>George Z.
>
Or any other president so why bother bringing it up?

Our last one was impeached for lying and Nixon was for resign for lying.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

[Mark and Kim Smith]

B2431 wrote:

>>From: "George Z. Bush"
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>The significance of that glitch is that he must have been speaking with
>>forked tongue during his election campaign, which meant that he was willing to
>>
>>
>lie to the voters in order to earn their support. And if that's not true, then
>he's
>
>
>>lying now in claiming an early need for regime change in Iraq.
>>
>>It's got to be one or the other.....you can't have it both ways.
>>Truthfulness does not seem to be one of our President's virtues.
>>
>>George Z.
>>
>>
>>
>Or any other president so why bother bringing it up?
>
>Our last one was impeached for lying and Nixon was for resign for lying.
>
>Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
>

Hmmm, maybe nothing ever changes?!? Once a president says something, it
is set in stone?!? Where I'm at, priorities change on a daily basis.
Lying is one thing, priority changes are a completely different thing.

[Alan Minyard]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:34:17 +1100, David Bromage > wrote:

>Hugo S. Cunningham wrote:
> > Were we going to buy political ads on Iraqi television asking Iraqi
> > voters to vote against Saddam at the next election?
>
>Anything is for sale. Just depends how much you are prepared to spend.
>
>You could have easily offered Saddam, Uday and Qusay a 9 or 10 figure
>sum in a Swiss bank account of their choice on condition they sod off to
>some tropical island and stay there. That would have cost less than the war.
>
>Cheers
>David

That is not how megalomaniacal dictators operate

Al Minyard

[Alan Minyard]

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:13:59 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" > wrote:

>
>"John Mullen" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> If it was only one country, you'd be right. But since the Monroe
>> Doctrine, you've been regularly invading other countries in the name of
>> Freedom and Democracy, often leaving them less free and less democratic
>> than before. I can provide a list if you like, but I'm sure that you
>> know what I'm talking about. That is a definition of Empire.
>>
>
>I don't know what you're talking about. Please provide that list.
>
He must be thinking of all of the troops we sent to "invade" the UK
1n 1943-44.

Al Minyard