PDA

View Full Version : Re: George Soros: "The US now in hands extremists"


Dick Locke
January 26th 04, 07:36 PM
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:43:29 -0800, "W. D. Allen Sr."
> wrote:

>Socialism is still alive and well in the American DemocRAT Party!

Well **that's** a mature argument...if this is how the Sr. writes,
imagine what the Jr. must be like....

Matt Wiser
January 27th 04, 03:42 PM
(themaltesebippy) wrote:
(Polybus) wrote
>in message >...
>> The US is now in the hands of a group of extremists
>
>
>Soros and his ilk have taken over?? Say it
>ain't so!
It ain't so. Soros and his ilk seem to think that anyone who's a Republican
is an extremist. If that's the case, then I ought to join that club (and
I'm one of only two Republicans in my immediate family). But does being a
moderate member of the GOP make one an extremist? No. That belongs to Jerry
Fallwell and the ultra-zealous conservative wing that thinks that John McCain
is a bleeding heart (I voted for him in the CA primary in 2000,and he ain't
no bleeding heart).

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

Denyav
January 27th 04, 04:40 PM
>The citizens of that country will have the opportunity to put this
>proposition to the test soon enough. In the meantime please
>desist from this egregious cross posting.

Do you mean the "senior" citizens of this country?

trotsky
January 30th 04, 02:22 AM
Richard wrote:
> wrote in message >...
>
>>In rec.food.cooking Richard > wrote:
>>
>>>Why doesn't Soros go back the Greece and practice sodomy?
>>
>>Why would Soros go back to Greece? He's been a United States resident
>>since 1956. Not to mention the fact that Soros was born in Hungary, not
>>Greece. If Soros wants to use his money to get the word out about how
>>bad George Bush is, that's none of your business.
>
>
> Aren't the @#%@#@# Liberals always crying about how people with
> money can get things done politically that people without can't
> and how unfair it all is?


The truth, you mean? The *******s!

Jim Yanik
January 30th 04, 06:43 PM
trotsky > wrote in
m:

> Richard wrote:
>> wrote in message
>> >...
>>
>>>In rec.food.cooking Richard > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why doesn't Soros go back the Greece and practice sodomy?
>>>
>>>Why would Soros go back to Greece? He's been a United States resident
>>>since 1956. Not to mention the fact that Soros was born in Hungary,
>>>not Greece. If Soros wants to use his money to get the word out about
>>>how bad George Bush is, that's none of your business.
>>
>>
>> Aren't the @#%@#@# Liberals always crying about how people with
>> money can get things done politically that people without can't
>> and how unfair it all is?
>
>
> The truth, you mean? The *******s!
>

That's why McCain-Feingold is bad(and unconstitutional),it keeps groups of
people from pooling their limited funds together and using it to voice
their opinion(at the most critical time,too),but still allows media
companies to voice their opinions as "editorials",besides their usual
biased news reporting.
It stifles the masses political voice.

If anything,political speech should be MOST protected by the 1st
Amendment,individual OR group.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

February 2nd 04, 09:19 PM
In rec.food.cooking Richard > wrote:
> wrote in message >...
>> In rec.food.cooking Richard > wrote:
>> > Why doesn't Soros go back the Greece and practice sodomy?
>>
>> Why would Soros go back to Greece? He's been a United States resident
>> since 1956. Not to mention the fact that Soros was born in Hungary, not
>> Greece. If Soros wants to use his money to get the word out about how
>> bad George Bush is, that's none of your business.

> Aren't the @#%@#@# Liberals always crying about how people with
> money can get things done politically that people without can't
> and how unfair it all is?

The conservatives seem to cry a lot about that too when someone
who's wealthy works against them. I heard lots of conservatives
crying that Jon Corzine bought his Senate seat. Corzine, for those
of you who don't know, is a first term Democratic Senator from
New Jersey who funded his own campaign and is probably among the
most wealthy people in the Senate, if not THE most wealthy. He
made is money working on Wall Street and as head of Goldman Saches.
In the New Jersey paper I read, hardly a day went by where some
bleedy heart conservative wasn't crying about how Corzine was
trying to buy a Senate seat. Even Corzine's opponent in the
election complained about that. Boo hoo!

February 2nd 04, 09:20 PM
In rec.food.cooking Olivers > wrote:
> Richard muttered....

>
>>
>> Aren't the @#%@#@# Liberals always crying about how people with
>> money can get things done politically that people without can't
>> and how unfair it all is?
>> -Rich

> Somehow, Soros's $45,000,000 and Al Franken's decking a demonstrator make
> loverly bookends to the leftish gas bag.

> Double standards, double gaits, two faced and and as dual purposed as one
> of Bill Clinton's seegars.

No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.

Jim Yanik
February 3rd 04, 02:04 AM
wrote in :

> In rec.food.cooking Olivers > wrote:
>> Richard muttered....
>
>>
>>>
>>> Aren't the @#%@#@# Liberals always crying about how people with
>>> money can get things done politically that people without can't
>>> and how unfair it all is?
>>> -Rich
>
>> Somehow, Soros's $45,000,000 and Al Franken's decking a demonstrator
>> make loverly bookends to the leftish gas bag.
>
>> Double standards, double gaits, two faced and and as dual purposed as
>> one of Bill Clinton's seegars.
>
> No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
> boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.
>
>

And security people were in the process of removing him.
So,Franken assaulted the guy,an illegal act.He had no standing to enter the
fray wioth the security people,no cause for assaulting him.
I hope the guy sues the pants off Franken.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

Bob McKellar
February 3rd 04, 02:11 AM
Jim Yanik wrote:

> <snip>

>
> I hope the guy sues the pants off Franken.
>
> --
> Jim Yanik
> jyanik-at-kua.net

That worked so well for Fox/O'Reilly!

Bob McKellar

Olivers
February 3rd 04, 02:42 PM
Stan from Temple muttered....


>
> No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
> boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.
>

Watch, folks, as Stan from Temple flashes his asss without dropping his
trousers. In a typical childish spurt of naivete', he proclaims for the
world: "Why, we Liberal demonstrators are never loud or boist(e)rous!"

Assault is assault, Stan, and in an equitable corner of the world, fat,
bespectacled Al ought to get arrested for it just as quickly as the cops
would haul off a band of your brand and affiliation.

Let's have some more loud and boisterous demonstators when that band of
whining misfits goes on parade, especially Tubby Dean, "El Agitado".

TMO

February 13th 04, 02:18 AM
In rec.food.cooking Roger Blake > wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2004 21:20:50 GMT, > wrote:
>>No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
>>boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.

> So you are saying that liberals *do* believe violence is a solution
> when it is their ox being gored. Thank you for admitting this.

Violence in this situation was delt out to the heckler after HE became
violent; it was a matter of self-defense. Are you saying now that you
are against self-defense?

Mr. Wizard
February 13th 04, 03:26 AM
> wrote in message ...
> In rec.food.cooking Roger Blake > wrote:
> > On 2 Feb 2004 21:20:50 GMT, > wrote:
> >>No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
> >>boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.
>
> > So you are saying that liberals *do* believe violence is a solution
> > when it is their ox being gored. Thank you for admitting this.
>
> Violence in this situation was delt out to the heckler after HE became
> violent; it was a matter of self-defense. Are you saying now that you
> are against self-defense?
>
Wrong.

Peter Stickney
February 16th 04, 05:27 PM
In article >,
writes:
> In rec.food.cooking Roger Blake > wrote:
>> On 2 Feb 2004 21:20:50 GMT, > wrote:
>>>No double standard at all. The guy who Al Franken decked was loud and
>>>boistrous and would not let Howard Dean even finish his speech.
>
>> So you are saying that liberals *do* believe violence is a solution
>> when it is their ox being gored. Thank you for admitting this.
>
> Violence in this situation was delt out to the heckler after HE became
> violent; it was a matter of self-defense. Are you saying now that you
> are against self-defense?

Were you there, Stan? I was.
It wasn't at all well-handled by either the Dean Campaign's Security,
or by Franken. It would have been very easy for it to go from a Marx
Brothers (Night at the Opera, specifically) farce to a real tragedy.
As in people getting killed. Not good planning on the campaign's
part, and plenty of poor judgement calls to go around.

That said, Franken did do something that was a positive step,
afterwoard - a special show for the benefit of the Palace Theatre
Trust, which owns and operates the Palace Theatre in Manchester.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster

Google