Re: Coalition casualties for January, 2004

[B2431]

>From: (Michael Petukhov)

>
>http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=35386&lang=en
>
>

OK, we know you like to crow about coalition casualties in Iraq. Now what I
want to knbow is why won't you post Russian casualties in Chechnya? Is it
because you are losing that war?

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

[Michael Petukhov]

(B2431) wrote in message >...
> >From: (Michael Petukhov)
>
> >
> >http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=35386&lang=en
> >
> >
>
> OK, we know you like to crow about coalition casualties in Iraq.

Lie. I don't.
> Now what I
> want to knbow is why won't you post Russian casualties in Chechnya?

Lie. I did post our losses in chechenya as well in this NG.

> Is it
> because you are losing that war?

Lie. we won the war.

>
> Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Most probably lie as well.

Michael

[Matt Wiser]

(B2431) wrote:
>>From: (Michael Petukhov)
>
>>
>>http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=35386&lang=en
>>
>>
>
>OK, we know you like to crow about coalition
>casualties in Iraq. Now what I
>want to knbow is why won't you post Russian
>casualties in Chechnya? Is it
>because you are losing that war?
>
>Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
That's probably a good reason. If Ivan's military was the old Red Army
of 1945 or even 1980, the Chechens would all be either in Siberia, over the
border in Georgia, or dead.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

[Matt Wiser]

(Michael Petukhov) wrote:
(B2431) wrote in message >...
>> >From: (Michael Petukhov)
>>
>> >
>> >http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=35386&lang=en
>> >
>> >
>>
>> OK, we know you like to crow about coalition
>casualties in Iraq.
>
>Lie. I don't.
>> Now what I
>> want to knbow is why won't you post Russian
>casualties in Chechnya?
>
>Lie. I did post our losses in chechenya as well
>in this NG.
>
>> Is it
>> because you are losing that war?
>
>Lie. we won the war.
>
>>
>> Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
>
>Most probably lie as well.
>
>Michael
Then how come you guys are still having much more trouble with the Chechens
than the U.S. and Coalition are having with the remnants of the Baathists
and the Jihadists? How long has it been since you guys first went after the
Chechens? We did better in Afghanistan than the old Soviet Army ever did,
and went from Kuwait to Baghdad in 21 days with only three divisions-and
apart from the Sunni Triangle, most of the country is quiet. The Russians
in Chechenia only control that area within range of their rifles, though.


Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!