Just a simple announcement for for students

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.

I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.

Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))

I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
the moderated aviation forum format.

Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
--
Dudley Henriques

[Rod]

Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

I just joined. Hope to see you guys over there. Adios r.a.p.

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> wrote:



>
>Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?

Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Rod wrote:
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> I just joined. Hope to see you guys over there. Adios r.a.p.


I'll look for you there, and welcome.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Larry Dighera]

On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:06:42 +0800, Stealth Pilot
> wrote in
>:

>On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
>a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>

Oh, you can expect to see Mr. Atkielski active in that forum too. :-)

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> > wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>
> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot

The narrow view might be yours. My impression of the forum is that it's
the "Pilots of America" making ALL pilots welcome there. There are
pilots from all over the world posting there and I've yet to see
anything negative......such as what YOU have just posted here on Usenet.
Perhaps THIS is why pilots are going to moderated forums :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Larry Dighera wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:06:42 +0800, Stealth Pilot
> > wrote in
> >:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>>
>
> Oh, you can expect to see Mr. Atkielski active in that forum too. :-)


Mxsmanic or anyone else for that matter, troll or otherwise, is
welcome on a moderated forum as long as their dialog is on topic and
meets the forum guidelines.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:14:23 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> wrote:

>Stealth Pilot wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>
>> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>>
>> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot
>
>The narrow view might be yours. My impression of the forum is that it's
>the "Pilots of America" making ALL pilots welcome there. There are
>pilots from all over the world posting there and I've yet to see
>anything negative......such as what YOU have just posted here on Usenet.
>Perhaps THIS is why pilots are going to moderated forums :-))

enjoy your time with mxmanic. thanks for coming. turn the light out
when you leave.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:14:23 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> > wrote:
>
>> Stealth Pilot wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>>>
>>> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot
>> The narrow view might be yours. My impression of the forum is that it's
>> the "Pilots of America" making ALL pilots welcome there. There are
>> pilots from all over the world posting there and I've yet to see
>> anything negative......such as what YOU have just posted here on Usenet.
>> Perhaps THIS is why pilots are going to moderated forums :-))
>
> enjoy your time with mxmanic. thanks for coming. turn the light out
> when you leave.

The following is a pasted in prepared response to Usenet posts like
this one.

Serious students and pilots reading this totally useless non aviation
related exchange;

.......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of
America", a moderated aviation forum where this type of off topic and
non aviation related post is discouraged to the point where it's deleted
for you so you don't have to deal with it.
Thank you
Dudley Henriques

--
Dudley Henriques

[Tina]

You're telling us there's a newsgroup where one need not speed read
over nonsense posts? What a concept.

See you there!

Tina

Dudley Henriques wrote:
> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
> have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
> safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
> moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
> answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
> of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.
>
> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>
> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
> of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
> place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
> this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))
>
> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
> the moderated aviation forum format.
>
> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
> --
> Dudley Henriques

[Maxwell[_2_]]

One announcement per month is plenty.

Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Tina wrote:
> You're telling us there's a newsgroup where one need not speed read
> over nonsense posts? What a concept.
>
> See you there!
>
> Tina
>
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
>> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
>> have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
>> safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
>> moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
>> answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
>> of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.
>>
>> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
>> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>>
>> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
>> of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
>> place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
>> this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
>> the moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques

You wouldn't believe how "refreshing" it was to see 13 posts in a row
with nothing but positive, friendly dialog exchange.

Catch you over there.


--
Dudley Henriques

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Maxwell wrote:
> One announcement per month is plenty.
>
> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.
>
>
>


The following is a pasted in prepared response to Usenet posts like
this one.

Serious students and pilots reading this totally useless non aviation
related exchange;

.......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of
America", a moderated aviation forum where this type of off topic and
non aviation related post is discouraged to the point where it's deleted
for you so you don't have to deal with it.
Thank you
Dudley Henriques

--
Dudley Henriques

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 6/7/2008 11:31 AM Maxwell said the following:
> One announcement per month is plenty.
>
> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.

The irony meter not only pegged, it exploded...

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484abca3$0$76830
:

> on 6/7/2008 11:31 AM Maxwell said the following:
>> One announcement per month is plenty.
>>
>> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.
>
> The irony meter not only pegged, it exploded...

It's a gift he has.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:Qpz2k.3277$yi.2158
@newsfe13.lga:

>
>
>

You should report him for spamming then. His TOS forbid it...




Or you could go **** yourself.




Your choice, really.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>
> You should report him for spamming then. His TOS forbid it...
>
>
>
>
> Or you could go **** yourself.
>
>
>
>
> Your choice, really.
>
>
>
> Bertie

Nah, I don't report bad behavior, I showcase it.

Dudley seems to be proving himself just as obsessed as the Buttlipps, but
with just a slightly different twist.

You two sound more alike every day.

Sure makes a person wonder, if you are not one and the same.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> You should report him for spamming then. His TOS forbid it...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Or you could go **** yourself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Your choice, really.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Nah, I don't report bad behavior, I showcase it.


You don't do either, actuaslly.
>
> Dudley seems to be proving himself just as obsessed as the Buttlipps,
> but with just a slightly different twist.
>
> You two sound more alike every day.
>
> Sure makes a person wonder, if you are not one and the same.


And not just a person, you as well!


Bertie

[romeomike]

Dudley Henriques wrote:

>
> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
> the moderated aviation forum format.
>
> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or are
leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell. It's
amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were to do
the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a Jekyll and
Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good. But there was
no good in his sparring partner, and you all might be less irritated if
you just killfile him.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

romeomike > wrote in :

> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience
>> of the moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or
> are leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell.
> It's amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were
> to do the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a
> Jekyll and Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good.
> But there was no good in his sparring partner, and you all might be
> less irritated if you just killfile him.
>


Actually, I'm not a Jekyll and Hyde at all. I've been accused of bullying
those I don't like, but the fact is I never flame anyone discussing actual
aviation. Might argue with them, but it would be as one pilot to another
and never the highhandedness that the utterly clueless have accused me of.
Quite simply, talk to me about airplanes and I'll talk back about
airplanes. Talk **** to me and that's what you get back...



Bertie

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

romeomike wrote:
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience
>> of the moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or are
> leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell. It's
> amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were to do
> the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a Jekyll and
> Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good. But there was
> no good in his sparring partner, and you all might be less irritated if
> you just killfile him.

I'll still be posting here but with a different approach. If it's flying
or aviation, I'll be more than happy to deal with it pro or con if I'm
around as always but I don't see much hope in seeing this result in much
more than the usual happening. Serious flying discussion will most
likely be taking place over on the POA forum where the general
atmosphere is much more conducive to enjoying the experience :-)

--
Dudley Henriques

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...

>
> Actually, I'm not a Jekyll and Hyde at all. I've been accused of bullying
> those I don't like, but the fact is I never flame anyone discussing actual
> aviation. Might argue with them, but it would be as one pilot to another
> and never the highhandedness that the utterly clueless have accused me of.
> Quite simply, talk to me about airplanes and I'll talk back about
> airplanes. Talk **** to me and that's what you get back...
>
>
>
> Bertie

Is that's why you cross post all the kook groups.

Is that why you forge other peoples id, and then lie about it to irritate
them and their friends.

Is that why you spam the group talking to your kook friends, trying your
best to irritate you victims in leaving the group.

Is that why you work so tirelessly, staying awake as you have claimed even
today, to poison every thread with you presence - even when you most often
have little if anything to add. Daring anyone to disagree with you.

Bull**** Buttlipps, you are a liar plane and simple. It's all happened far
too many times.

You want to moderate this group, just as Dudley did, and will alienate one
person at a time if you can to make that happen. Just as you have in the
past.

Sure, you think it's a popularity contest. You think as long as you can keep
enough sock puppets, you can control the group. But frankly, I give the
people here much more credit. I really don't think they are that stupid.
Most are just staying quiet right now, because they don't want to argue with
the village idiot.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"romeomike" > wrote in message
...
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to compare
>> the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of the
>> moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or are
> leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell. It's
> amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were to do
> the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a Jekyll and
> Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good. But there was no
> good in his sparring partner, and you all might be less irritated if you
> just killfile him.

I thought you were a little smarter than that Mike, but do what you feel you
need to do.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> romeomike wrote:
>> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
>>> the moderated aviation forum format.
>>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>
>> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or are
>> leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell. It's
>> amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were to do
>> the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a Jekyll and
>> Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good. But there was
>> no good in his sparring partner, and you all might be less irritated if
>> you just killfile him.
>
> I'll still be posting here but with a different approach. If it's flying
> or aviation, I'll be more than happy to deal with it pro or con if I'm
> around as always but I don't see much hope in seeing this result in much
> more than the usual happening. Serious flying discussion will most likely
> be taking place over on the POA forum where the general atmosphere is much
> more conducive to enjoying the experience :-)
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

Nah, you're just spamming Dudley.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Maxwell wrote:
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> romeomike wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>>>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>>>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
>>>> the moderated aviation forum format.
>>>>
>>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or are
>>> leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile Maxwell. It's
>>> amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap. If one were to do
>>> the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep Bertie. He's a Jekyll and
>>> Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to have the good. But there was
>>> no good in his sparring partner, and you all might be less irritated if
>>> you just killfile him.
>> I'll still be posting here but with a different approach. If it's flying
>> or aviation, I'll be more than happy to deal with it pro or con if I'm
>> around as always but I don't see much hope in seeing this result in much
>> more than the usual happening. Serious flying discussion will most likely
>> be taking place over on the POA forum where the general atmosphere is much
>> more conducive to enjoying the experience :-)
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Nah, you're just spamming Dudley.
>
>
No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)

--
Dudley Henriques

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
>>
> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving people
> the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>
> --

Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie, all at
the same time.

Why should we be surprised?

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>
>> --
>
> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
> all at the same time.

Wow, you don't know anything about anything, do you?

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "romeomike" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than
>>> to allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative
>>> experience of the moderated aviation forum format.
>>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>
>> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or
>> are leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile
>> Maxwell. It's amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap.
>> If one were to do the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep
>> Bertie. He's a Jekyll and Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to
>> have the good. But there was no good in his sparring partner, and you
>> all might be less irritated if you just killfile him.
>
> I thought you were a little smarter than that Mike, but do what you
> feel you need to do.



I'm sure he's relieved he has your blessing.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>> Actually, I'm not a Jekyll and Hyde at all. I've been accused of
>> bullying those I don't like, but the fact is I never flame anyone
>> discussing actual aviation. Might argue with them, but it would be as
>> one pilot to another and never the highhandedness that the utterly
>> clueless have accused me of. Quite simply, talk to me about airplanes
>> and I'll talk back about airplanes. Talk **** to me and that's what
>> you get back...
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Is that's why you cross post all the kook groups.
>


Actually, I only poast there when I have a good k00k on the line.
They're afficianados, you see.



> Is that why you forge other peoples id, and then lie about it to
> irritate them and their friends.
>
> Is that why you spam the group talking to your kook friends, trying
> your best to irritate you victims in leaving the group.


Woul dyou please look up the definition of the word SPAM, fjuktard?



>
> Is that why you work so tirelessly, staying awake as you have claimed
> even today,


I didn't claim that, idiot. Went right over your head , as usual.


to poison every thread with you presence - even when you
> most often have little if anything to add. Daring anyone to disagree
> with you.


Bull****.


>
> Bull**** Buttlipps, you are a liar plane and simple. It's all happened
> far too many times.
>
> You want to moderate this group, just as Dudley did, and will alienate
> one person at a time if you can to make that happen. Just as you have
> in the past.


Nope., I poast about airplkanes and can't resist the occasional flaming
k00k that comes my way.

>
> Sure, you think it's a popularity contest. You think as long as you
> can keep enough sock puppets, you can control the group. But frankly,
> I give the people here much more credit. I really don't think they are
> that stupid. Most are just staying quiet right now, because they don't
> want to argue with the village idiot.


Snort!

God I love usenet.


Bertie
>
>
>

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Maxwell wrote:
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving people
>> the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>
>> --
>
> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie, all at
> the same time.
>
> Why should we be surprised?
>
>

We? You've GOT to be kidding :-)))))) Who exactly is "we"? :-))

Anyway; have it your way. Call it anything you want to call it. If you
like calling it spam, so be it. I call it a public service giving people
interested in serious or even friendly aviation discussion an option to
this constant crapola you spew here on this forum.

I'll allow myself to be called a spammer all day long if it helps
aviation and people who like aviation. You obviously don't since all
anyone can Google up on you is this kind of bull****.

Every nasty or non aviation related post you make to me in the future
will carry this message as listed below, so every post you make like
this will be the direct cause of this message being repeated here on the
forum. If your posts to me are aviation related, you won't see this
"Spam" as you call it: so have at it.

And for those who don't already know, the online aviation site I'm
"spamming for" is non-profit and exists only for the enjoyment and
education of those who choose to post there.

_____________________________________

The following is a pasted in prepared response to Usenet posts like this
one.

"Serious students and pilots reading this totally useless non aviation
related exchange;

.......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of
America", a moderated aviation forum where this type of off topic and
non aviation related post is discouraged to the point where it's deleted
for you so you don't have to deal with it."
Thank you
Dudley Henriques



--

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in news:Xns9AB696260E7F9A01773E1E7C2A948@
127.0.0.1:

> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "romeomike" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or
>>> are leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile
>>> Maxwell. It's amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap.
>>> If one were to do the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep
>>> Bertie. He's a Jekyll and Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to
>>> have the good. But there was no good in his sparring partner, and you
>>> all might be less irritated if you just killfile him.
>>
>> I thought you were a little smarter than that Mike, but do what you
>> feel you need to do.
>
> Everybody hates you.
>
> You're stupid, filthy, smelly and worthless. You suck.
>

I love him!

Bertie

[Max Isn't Well]

In article >, Maxwell says...

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >
> > Actually, I'm not a Jekyll and Hyde at all. I've been accused of bullying
> > those I don't like, but the fact is I never flame anyone discussing actual
> > aviation. Might argue with them, but it would be as one pilot to another
> > and never the highhandedness that the utterly clueless have accused me of.
> > Quite simply, talk to me about airplanes and I'll talk back about
> > airplanes. Talk **** to me and that's what you get back...
> >
> >
> >
> > Bertie
>
> Is that's why you cross post all the kook groups.
>
> Is that why you forge other peoples id, and then lie about it to irritate
> them and their friends.
>
> Is that why you spam the group talking to your kook friends, trying your
> best to irritate you victims in leaving the group.
>
> Is that why you work so tirelessly, staying awake as you have claimed even
> today, to poison every thread with you presence - even when you most often
> have little if anything to add. Daring anyone to disagree with you.
>
> Bull**** Buttlipps, you are a liar plane and simple. It's all happened far
> too many times.
>
> You want to moderate this group, just as Dudley did, and will alienate one
> person at a time if you can to make that happen. Just as you have in the
> past.

Do you have any kl00 as to what a moderated froup is, or how moderation
is accomplished?

No?

I thought not.

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Max Isn't Well]

In article >, Maxwell says...

>
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving people
> > the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
> >
> > --
>
> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie, all at
> the same time.

Lets start with the basics.

Define "spam".

(Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)

And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"

Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
...
> Maxwell wrote:
>>
>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie, all
>> at the same time.
>>
>> Why should we be surprised?
>
> We? You've GOT to be kidding :-)))))) Who exactly is "we"? :-))
>
The other members of this group, that are tired of hearing your head rattle.


> Anyway; have it your way. Call it anything you want to call it. If you
> like calling it spam, so be it. I call it a public service giving people
> interested in serious or even friendly aviation discussion an option to
> this constant crapola you spew here on this forum.
>
Fine, I call it spam, and recognize it as Dudley's despareate pleas for
minions.


>
> I'll allow myself to be called a spammer all day long if it helps aviation
> and people who like aviation.
And recruits followers to your ilk.


You obviously don't since all
> anyone can Google up on you is this kind of bull****.
>
Well if you were worth a **** Googling, you would quick discover that I come
here to read and learn, not teach and preach. I just got tired you and
Bertie's insistance on controlling the newsgroup, and didn't mind calling
bull****.


>
> Every nasty or non aviation related post you make to me in the future will
> carry this message as listed below, so every post you make like this will
> be the direct cause of this message being repeated here on the forum. If
> your posts to me are aviation related, you won't see this "Spam" as you
> call it: so have at it.
>
Fine, door swings both ways. I'll put together a little public service
announcement just for you as well.

>
> And for those who don't already know, the online aviation site I'm
> "spamming for" is non-profit and exists only for the enjoyment and
> education of those who choose to post there.
>
As is this one.




> _____________________________________
>
> The following is a pasted in prepared response to Usenet posts like this
> one.
>
> "Serious students and pilots reading this totally useless non aviation
> related exchange;
>
> ......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of America",
> a moderated aviation forum where this type of off topic and non aviation
> related post is discouraged to the point where it's deleted for you so you
> don't have to deal with it."
> Thank you
> Dudley Henriques
>
And for those interested in freedom, welcome to RAP. Just ignore the self
appointed moderators, Dudley and Buttlipps.


Thanks for finally coming out of the closet. I always knew there was a
lunatic in there just waiting to escape.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
:

> In article >, Maxwell says...
>
>>
>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
>> > people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
>> all at the same time.
>
> Lets start with the basics.
>
> Define "spam".
>
> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>
> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>
> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>

It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...

Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?

Bertie

[Max Isn't Well]

In article >, Bertie the
Bunyip says...

> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
> :
>
> > In article >, Maxwell says...
> >
> >>
> >> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >>
> >> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
> >> > people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >>
> >> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
> >> all at the same time.
> >
> > Lets start with the basics.
> >
> > Define "spam".
> >
> > (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
> >
> > And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
> >
> > Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
> >
>
> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>
> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?

The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99

At this point even the trolls have abandoned it

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
:

> In article >, Bertie the
> Bunyip says...
>
>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > In article >, Maxwell says...
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >>
>> >> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
Giving
>> >> > people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >>
>> >> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
Bertie,
>> >> all at the same time.
>> >
>> > Lets start with the basics.
>> >
>> > Define "spam".
>> >
>> > (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>> >
>> > And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>> >
>> > Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>> >
>>
>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>
>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>
> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>
> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>

That's what i thought. I was hoping to get Maxie to whine to them, but
no dice. He's not even bright enough to try anyway.
Shame about nanau, though. It used to be a laugh to pull some k00k's
chain and then point him in their direction where said k00k would
usually whine for days about how the mean old Bunyip was abusing him...



Bertie

[Max Isn't Well]

In article >, Bertie the
Bunyip says...

> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
> :
>
> > In article >, Bertie the
> > Bunyip says...
> >
> >> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >> > In article >, Maxwell says...
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
> Giving
> >> >> > people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >>
> >> >> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
> Bertie,
> >> >> all at the same time.
> >> >
> >> > Lets start with the basics.
> >> >
> >> > Define "spam".
> >> >
> >> > (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
> >> >
> >> > And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
> >> >
> >> > Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
> >> >
> >>
> >> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
> >>
> >> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
> >
> > The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
> >
> > At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
> >
>
> That's what i thought. I was hoping to get Maxie to whine to them, but
> no dice. He's not even bright enough to try anyway.
> Shame about nanau, though. It used to be a laugh to pull some k00k's
> chain and then point him in their direction where said k00k would
> usually whine for days about how the mean old Bunyip was abusing him...

I'd like to see him put forth a proposal in news.groups for
retro-moderating RAP.


--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
:

> In article >, Bertie the
> Bunyip says...
>
>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > In article >, Bertie the
>> > Bunyip says...
>> >
>> >> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>> >> :
>> >>
>> >> > In article >, Maxwell says...
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
>> Giving
>> >> >> > people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love
:-)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
>> Bertie,
>> >> >> all at the same time.
>> >> >
>> >> > Lets start with the basics.
>> >> >
>> >> > Define "spam".
>> >> >
>> >> > (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>> >> >
>> >> > And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>> >> >
>> >> > Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>> >>
>> >> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>> >
>> > The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>> >
>> > At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>> >
>>
>> That's what i thought. I was hoping to get Maxie to whine to them,
but
>> no dice. He's not even bright enough to try anyway.
>> Shame about nanau, though. It used to be a laugh to pull some k00k's
>> chain and then point him in their direction where said k00k would
>> usually whine for days about how the mean old Bunyip was abusing
him...
>
> I'd like to see him put forth a proposal in news.groups for
> retro-moderating RAP.
>
>

That's always fun too. Provoking newbs to cancel poasts and then
watching them get TOSsed for it! X-cels are hardly ever executed these
days so that's another game down the toilet...


Bertie

[Peter Dohm]

"Rich Ahrens" > wrote in message
. net...
> on 6/7/2008 11:31 AM Maxwell said the following:
>> One announcement per month is plenty.
>>
>> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.
>
> The irony meter not only pegged, it exploded...

Thanks! I couldn't recall what that smoking hole used to be...

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Peter Dohm" > wrote in message
...
> "Rich Ahrens" > wrote in message
> . net...
>> on 6/7/2008 11:31 AM Maxwell said the following:
>>> One announcement per month is plenty.
>>>
>>> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.
>>
>> The irony meter not only pegged, it exploded...
>
> Thanks! I couldn't recall what that smoking hole used to be...
>
>

Good one Peter, that's funny!

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:WaE2k.158$QN1.15
@newsfe15.lga:

>
> "Peter Dohm" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Rich Ahrens" > wrote in message
>> . net...
>>> on 6/7/2008 11:31 AM Maxwell said the following:
>>>> One announcement per month is plenty.
>>>>
>>>> Several per day is spamming, plane and simple.
>>>
>>> The irony meter not only pegged, it exploded...
>>
>> Thanks! I couldn't recall what that smoking hole used to be...
>>
>>
>
> Good one Peter, that's funny!
>

Slurp whoosh..


Hmm, sounds like... going down the toilet



Bertie

[terry]

On Jun 8, 12:06*am, Stealth Pilot >
wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>
> > wrote:
>
> >Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>
> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot

Its just the name of the organisation Stealth, come on over, I have
just joined up myself.
and of course there is always "Straight and Level Downunder" which
also despite the name, welcomes
aviators from anywhere.
Terry

[WindsorFox]

Max Isn't Well wrote:
> In article >, Bertie the
> Bunyip says...
>
>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>
>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
>>>> all at the same time.
>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>
>>> Define "spam".
>>>
>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>
>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>
>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>
>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>
>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>
> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>
> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>

You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.

--


"Listen asshole, this case is not closed. I demand
that you <the Better Business Bureau> order the abusive
individual Geoff B. to take down these websites." - Tard

[Max Isn't Well]

In article >, WindsorFox<SS> says...

> Max Isn't Well wrote:
> > In article >, Bertie the
> > Bunyip says...
> >
> >> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >>> In article >, Maxwell says...
> >>>
> >>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
> >>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
> >>>> all at the same time.
> >>> Lets start with the basics.
> >>>
> >>> Define "spam".
> >>>
> >>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
> >>>
> >>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
> >>>
> >>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
> >>>
> >> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
> >>
> >> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
> >
> > The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
> >
> > At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
> >
>
> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.

Almost none of which has been intelligent

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Mxsmanic]

Max Isn't Well writes:

> Lets start with the basics.
>
> Define "spam".
>
> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)

No, it's not an acronym. That's folk etymology. The term is simply derived
from the name of the commercial food product, SPAM (made by Hormel).

[Bertie[_2_]]

Stealth Pilot brought next idea :
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
> > wrote:



>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?

> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot

Then you can suck my dick.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Bertie > wrote in news:484b83af$0$25949
:

> Stealth Pilot brought next idea :
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>> > wrote:
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
>> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>
>> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot
>
> Then you can suck my dick.
>

Oh excellent. Does this mean I can take the day off?

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
@posting2.glorb.com:

> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>> In article >, Bertie the
>> Bunyip says...
>>
>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>
>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
Giving
>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
Bertie,
>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>
>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>
>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>
>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>
>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>
>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>
>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>
>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>
>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>
>
> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>

Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.



Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>>
>
> Oh excellent. Does this mean I can take the day off?
>

You're already off every day.

[Onideus Mad Hatter]

On 07 Jun 2008 20:46:13 GMT, gregvk > wrote:

>"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:
>
>>
>> "romeomike" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> Amen, but I hope you do stay here, and I hope those who have left or
>>> are leaving change their minds. I finally decided to killfile
>>> Maxwell. It's amazing how that simple act has cut down on the crap.
>>> If one were to do the same to Bertie...but personally, I'll keep
>>> Bertie. He's a Jekyll and Hyde personality, and I'll keep the bad to
>>> have the good. But there was no good in his sparring partner, and you
>>> all might be less irritated if you just killfile him.
>>
>> I thought you were a little smarter than that Mike, but do what you
>> feel you need to do.
>
>Everybody hates you.
>
>You're stupid, filthy, smelly and worthless. You suck.

I prefer the original...

"Nobody likes you. Everybody hates you. You're gonna lose. Smile, you
****."

Bruce Willis is the man. *nods*

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog


Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Don't ever **** with someone who has more creativity than you do."

"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."

"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."

"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."

"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."

"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the **** up!"

"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."

"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."

"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."

"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"

"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."

"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."

"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."

"People are pretty ****ing high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."

"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."

"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."

"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."

"Those who record history are those who control history."

"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."

"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."

"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"

"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."

"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )

[Dave Doe]

In article >,
says...
> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
> have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
> safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
> moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
> answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
> of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.
>
> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>
> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
> of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
> place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
> this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))
>
> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
> the moderated aviation forum format.
>
> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

That's great Dudley. Just one small problem. We don't all live in
America! :)

--
Duncan

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably understand
Dudley far better.
my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
flying.
sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
enthusiasm.

back in the 70's there was just such a guy in our hangar who used to
talk to the newbies. I found out many years later that the boss
actually employed him to sit in the hangar and talk to the students so
that they would develop a robust and competent sense of airmanship.
It worked because not one of his students has ever been involved in an
accident that I'm aware of.
his presence filled so much of our appreciation of flying that we all
thought we'd spent most of our flying training with him. I was utterly
shocked a few years ago to discover that I'd spent just 45 minutes in
the air with him as my actual instructor during my entire training.

The dudley's of this world fill a little realized void in the emerging
pilot's needs.

so maxwell, bugger off and give him the room to do it.
your all consuming jealousy for something so simple as competent
advise is just amazing.

Stealth Pilot

[Art Deco[_5_]]

Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:

>"WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
:
>
>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>>> In article >, Bertie the
>>> Bunyip says...
>>>
>>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
>Giving
>>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
>Bertie,
>>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>>
>>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>>
>>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>>
>>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>>
>>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>>
>>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>>
>>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>>
>>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>>
>>
>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>>
>
>Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.

Ritual stem abuse is a HUGE problem.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

[WindsorFox]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
> @posting2.glorb.com:
>
>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>>> In article >, Bertie the
>>> Bunyip says...
>>>
>>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
> Giving
>>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
> Bertie,
>>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>>
>>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>>
>>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>>
>>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>>
>>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>>
>>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>>
>>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>>
>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>>
>
> Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.
>
>

Personally, I don't care if they are skeert or not or if they never
even notice. The important thing with a UDP on Google is that it would
stop the garbage flowing from GG into Usenet. If they fix it, fine. If
they don't, they stay blocked. Either way it's a win.

--


"Listen asshole, this case is not closed. I demand
that you <the Better Business Bureau> order the abusive
individual Geoff B. to take down these websites." - Tard

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Stealth Pilot" > wrote in message
...

bull**** snip >

If you had a small modicum of compassion for this group, you wouldn't be
spinning tales like this one, and sock puppeting for either one of them.

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably understand
> Dudley far better.
> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
> flying.
> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
> enthusiasm.

The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't be
surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of heavy
duty pain medication.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:KLT2k.2608$js1.2400
@newsfe24.lga:

>
> "Stealth Pilot" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> bull**** snip >
>
> If you had a small modicum of compassion for this group, you wouldn't be
> spinning tales like this one, and sock puppeting for either one of them.
>
>
>
>

Jesus christ on a fjukking hopped up go kart you're an idiot.


http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=sock+puppet&i=57353,00.asp



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet



Next time I tell you to look something up just do it already. O r you may
make Bertie angry.

And you wouldn't like an angry Bertie.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:7GO2k.4738$t07.3035
@newsfe22.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>>
>> Oh excellent. Does this mean I can take the day off?
>>
>
> You're already off every day.
>
>
>
>

frayed knot, and seeing as how alternate Bertie is slacking...



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Art Deco > wrote in news:080620080836449910%erfc-1024
@usa.net:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>>"WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
:
>>
>>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>>>> In article >, Bertie the
>>>> Bunyip says...
>>>>
>>>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
>>Giving
>>>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
>>Bertie,
>>>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>>>
>>>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>>>
>>>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>>>
>>>
>>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite
a
>>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>>>
>>
>>Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.
>
> Ritual stem abuse is a HUGE problem.
>

I've heard..

bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2h12i$nuo$1
@posting2.glorb.com:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
>> @posting2.glorb.com:
>>
>>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>>>> In article >, Bertie the
>>>> Bunyip says...
>>>>
>>>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
>> Giving
>>>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
>> Bertie,
>>>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>>>
>>>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>>>
>>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite
a
>>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>>>
>>
>> Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.
>>
>>
>
> Personally, I don't care if they are skeert or not or if they
never
> even notice. The important thing with a UDP on Google is that it would
> stop the garbage flowing from GG into Usenet. If they fix it, fine. If
> they don't, they stay blocked. Either way it's a win.
>

Well, the biggest advantage as far as I can see is that it would be
funny.


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>
> Next time I tell you to look something up just do it already. O r you may
> make Bertie angry.
>
> And you wouldn't like an angry Bertie.
>

Sock puppet, schmock puppet, it doens't make a ****. You can play word games
all day long, I could care less if you do, or if you get angry.

When names show up, either fictional second identites, your lame assed
forgeries, or just real people echoing your nonsense and cross posting the
same unrelated groups - the shoe fits just fine.

Like it or lump it, lamer.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
:

> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably understand
>> Dudley far better.
>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>> flying.
>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>> enthusiasm.
>
> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't be
> surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of heavy
> duty pain medication.
>

And then there's those damned warts...



Bertie

[Seth]

In article >,
Mxsmanic > wrote:
>Max Isn't Well writes:
>
>> Lets start with the basics.
>>
>> Define "spam".
>>
>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>
>No, it's not an acronym. That's folk etymology. The term is simply derived
>from the name of the commercial food product, SPAM (made by Hormel).

The term is derived from the Monty Python routine (which contained
much mention of Hormel's product).

Seth

[JosephKK]

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:33:19 -0700, Max Isn't Well
<luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote:

>In article >, WindsorFox<SS> says...
>
>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>> > In article >, Bertie the
>> > Bunyip says...
>> >
>> >> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>> >> :
>> >>
>> >>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>> >>>> ...
>> >>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
>> >>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
>> >>>> all at the same time.
>> >>> Lets start with the basics.
>> >>>
>> >>> Define "spam".
>> >>>
>> >>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>> >>>
>> >>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>> >>>
>> >>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>> >>>
>> >> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>> >>
>> >> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>> >
>> > The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>> >
>> > At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>> >
>>
>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>
>Almost none of which has been intelligent

If you are so brilliant lead the way. Let's see your method.

[Paul M. Anton]

>> ......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of
> America",

Thanks for passing it on

I just signed up

Paul
N1431A
KPLU

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

HARRY POTTER > wrote in
:

> Stealth Pilot wrote:
>
>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>> understand Dudley far better.
>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>> flying.
>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>> enthusiasm.
>>
>> back in the 70's there was just such a guy in our hangar who used to
>> talk to the newbies. I found out many years later that the boss
>> actually employed him to sit in the hangar and talk to the students
>> so that they would develop a robust and competent sense of
>> airmanship. It worked because not one of his students has ever been
>> involved in an accident that I'm aware of.
>> his presence filled so much of our appreciation of flying that we all
>> thought we'd spent most of our flying training with him. I was
>> utterly shocked a few years ago to discover that I'd spent just 45
>> minutes in the air with him as my actual instructor during my entire
>> training.
>>
>> The dudley's of this world fill a little realized void in the
>> emerging pilot's needs.
>>
>> so maxwell, bugger off and give him the room to do it.
>> your all consuming jealousy for something so simple as competent
>> advise is just amazing.
>>
>> Stealth Pilot
>
> Ugh, this is the kind of crap that makes me vomit. Piloting is not
> some kind of religious thing. All you do is move a yoke around and
> pull the power levers back and forth. No pilot ever is what I would
> consider a hero.
>
> Dudley is nothing but an attention seeking loser who is in love with
> himself.
>

Now THAT is a sock puppet.


Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
> HARRY POTTER > wrote in
>
> Now THAT is a sock puppet.
>
>
> Bertie

Liar.

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in message
...
>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Next time I tell you to look something up just do it already. O r you may
>> make Bertie angry.
>>
>> And you wouldn't like an angry Bertie.
>>
>
> Sock puppet, schmock puppet, it doens't make a ****. You can play word
> games all day long, I could care less if you do, or if you get angry.
>
> When names show up, either fictional second identites, your lame assed
> forgeries, or just real people echoing your nonsense and cross posting the
> same unrelated groups - the shoe fits just fine.
>
> Like it or lump it, lamer.
>

Hey Squirty, ya missed one.

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Paul M. Anton wrote:
>>> ......you might want to consider visiting and joining "Pilots of
>> America",
>
> Thanks for passing it on
>
> I just signed up
>
> Paul
> N1431A
> KPLU
>
>
It's a nice forum. Lots of friendly and knowledgable conversation going
on over there.


--
Dudley Henriques

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Dave Doe wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
>> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
>> have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
>> safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
>> moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
>> answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
>> of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.
>>
>> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
>> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>>
>> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
>> of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
>> place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
>> this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
>> the moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> That's great Dudley. Just one small problem. We don't all live in
> America! :)
>
I don't believe that's a problem. It's my impression that all pilots are
welcome as long as the forum rules are followed. I've seen nothing at
all to indicate that POA is an "American" thing, unwelcome to fellow
pilots from other countries.
Please feel free to lurk the forum and decide this for yourself, but my
experience so far has been completely positive and internationally so.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:NWY2k.3970$yi.517
@newsfe13.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>> HARRY POTTER > wrote in
>>
>> Now THAT is a sock puppet.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Liar.
>
>
>

Nope.



Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> Next time I tell you to look something up just do it already. O r
>>> you may make Bertie angry.
>>>
>>> And you wouldn't like an angry Bertie.
>>>
>>
>> Sock puppet, schmock puppet, it doens't make a ****. You can play
>> word games all day long, I could care less if you do, or if you get
>> angry.
>>
>> When names show up, either fictional second identites, your lame
>> assed forgeries, or just real people echoing your nonsense and cross
>> posting the same unrelated groups - the shoe fits just fine.
>>
>> Like it or lump it, lamer.
>>
>
> Hey Squirty, ya missed one.
>
>
>
>

Nope.


Bertie

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 6/8/2008 4:48 PM HARRY POTTER said the following:
<nothing of significance>

Just another asshole from El Paso...

[Larry Dighera]

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:57:21 -0500, Rich Ahrens >
wrote in >:

>on 6/8/2008 4:48 PM HARRY POTTER said the following:
><nothing of significance>
>
>Just another asshole from El Paso...

I thought you were living in MN. :-)

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:57:21 -0500, Rich Ahrens >
> wrote in >:
>
>>on 6/8/2008 4:48 PM HARRY POTTER said the following:
>><nothing of significance>
>>
>>Just another asshole from El Paso...
>
> I thought you were living in MN. :-)

Does your NSP know you'r enot poasting aviation content?


Bertie

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 6/8/2008 7:22 PM Larry Dighera said the following:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:57:21 -0500, Rich Ahrens >
> wrote in >:
>
>> on 6/8/2008 4:48 PM HARRY POTTER said the following:
>> <nothing of significance>
>>
>> Just another asshole from El Paso...
>
> I thought you were living in MN. :-)

Whoosh.

[WindsorFox]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2h12i$nuo$1
> @posting2.glorb.com:
>
>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> "WindsorFox<SS>" > wrote in news:g2fjda$7n6$1
>>> @posting2.glorb.com:
>>>
>>>> Max Isn't Well wrote:
>>>>> In article >, Bertie the
>>>>> Bunyip says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article >, Maxwell says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives.
>>> Giving
>>>>>>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for
>>> Bertie,
>>>>>>>> all at the same time.
>>>>>>> Lets start with the basics.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Define "spam".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
>>>>> The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
>>>>>
>>>> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite
> a
>>>> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
>>>>
>>> Really? I hope google is frightened of guys who eat pizza.
>>>
>>>
>> Personally, I don't care if they are skeert or not or if they
> never
>> even notice. The important thing with a UDP on Google is that it would
>> stop the garbage flowing from GG into Usenet. If they fix it, fine. If
>> they don't, they stay blocked. Either way it's a win.
>>
>
> Well, the biggest advantage as far as I can see is that it would be
> funny.
>
>
> Bertie

#2 on my list....

--


"Listen asshole, this case is not closed. I demand
that you <the Better Business Bureau> order the abusive
individual Geoff B. to take down these websites." - Tard

[Martin Hotze[_2_]]

Seth schrieb:
>> No, it's not an acronym. That's folk etymology. The term is simply derived
>>from the name of the commercial food product, SPAM (made by Hormel).
>
> The term is derived from the Monty Python routine (which contained
> much mention of Hormel's product).

here is the clip:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE>

> Seth

#m

[Dave Doe]

In article >,
says...
> Dave Doe wrote:
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
> >> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum and
> >> have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make aviation
> >> safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue forum that is
> >> moderated by aviation people, friendly to your questions and those who
> >> answer you, you might wish to consider adding the online forum "Pilots
> >> of America" to your list of places to hang out and exchange information.
> >>
> >> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
> >> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
> >>
> >> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take note
> >> of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that takes
> >> place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether exploring
> >> this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your time. :-))))))
> >>
> >> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
> >> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
> >> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience of
> >> the moderated aviation forum format.
> >>
> >> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
> >
> > That's great Dudley. Just one small problem. We don't all live in
> > America! :)
> >
> I don't believe that's a problem. It's my impression that all pilots are
> welcome as long as the forum rules are followed. I've seen nothing at
> all to indicate that POA is an "American" thing, unwelcome to fellow
> pilots from other countries.
> Please feel free to lurk the forum and decide this for yourself, but my
> experience so far has been completely positive and internationally so.
>

Cheers, will do.

--
Duncan

[Gezellig[_2_]]

Dudley Henriques blithered dramatically whilst picking the gonad hairs
from his teeth once fluffy on the testicles of his retaded son :
> Stealth Pilot wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:35:48 -0400, Dudley Henriques
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>>
>> a very narrow view of the world. what of the pilots *not* in america?
>>
>> Stealth (in the world's best flying country) Pilot

> The narrow view might be yours. My impression of the forum is that it's the
> "Pilots of America" making ALL pilots welcome there. There are pilots from
> all over the world posting there and I've yet to see anything
> negative......such as what YOU have just posted here on Usenet.
> Perhaps THIS is why pilots are going to moderated forums :-))

See you there!

[Dudley's Dick]

Stealth Pilot formulated the question :
> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably understand
> Dudley far better.
> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
> flying.
> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
> enthusiasm.

> back in the 70's there was just such a guy in our hangar who used to
> talk to the newbies. I found out many years later that the boss
> actually employed him to sit in the hangar and talk to the students so
> that they would develop a robust and competent sense of airmanship.
> It worked because not one of his students has ever been involved in an
> accident that I'm aware of.
> his presence filled so much of our appreciation of flying that we all
> thought we'd spent most of our flying training with him. I was utterly
> shocked a few years ago to discover that I'd spent just 45 minutes in
> the air with him as my actual instructor during my entire training.

> The dudley's of this world fill a little realized void in the emerging
> pilot's needs.

> so maxwell, bugger off and give him the room to do it.
> your all consuming jealousy for something so simple as competent
> advise is just amazing.

> Stealth Pilot

Well said. Ever since Dudley's Dick stopped working, he was toast. We
need to allow for Melba Henriques and applaud his courage to expose
himsself as the eunuch he is publically.

[Larry Dighera]

On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:45:15 +0200, Martin Hotze >
wrote in >:

>Seth schrieb:
>>> No, it's not an acronym. That's folk etymology. The term is simply derived
>>>from the name of the commercial food product, SPAM (made by Hormel).
>>
>> The term is derived from the Monty Python routine (which contained
>> much mention of Hormel's product).
>
>here is the clip:
><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE>
>
>> Seth
>
>#m
>

Here's the definition:

http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as little as
one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do you
think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done with
cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
alt.rush-limbaugh and alt.politics.homosexuality will almost
inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with troll behavior;
the latter more specific term has become more common. ...

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip >
wrote:

>Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
:
>
>> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably understand
>>> Dudley far better.
>>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>>> flying.
>>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>>> enthusiasm.
>>
>> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't be
>> surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of heavy
>> duty pain medication.
>>
>
>And then there's those damned warts...
>
>
>
>Bertie

oh you bloody card bertie. rotflmao.
Stealth pilot

[Stealth Pilot[_2_]]

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:48:54 -0600, HARRY POTTER
> wrote:


>
>Ugh, this is the kind of crap that makes me vomit. Piloting is not some kind
>of religious thing. All you do is move a yoke around and pull the power
>levers back and forth. No pilot ever is what I would consider a hero.
>

god you are a dunce. even bloody mx understands more than that and he
knows nothing.

aviation is an environment of non linear relationships where the only
constant is an accelleration into the nearby planet.

it's a subtle world up there. right over your head.

Stealth Pilot

[[email protected]]

On Jun 7, 4:35 pm, "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote:
> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
>
> ...> Maxwell wrote:
>
> >> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie, all
> >> at the same time.
>
> >> Why should we be surprised?
>
> > We? You've GOT to be kidding :-)))))) Who exactly is "we"? :-))
>
> The other members of this group, that are tired of hearing your head rattle.
>>Drivel snipped<<

No actually. We're tired of listening to YOUR head rattle.

Why don't you STFU and sit down and give the gaping wound in the front
of your face a chance to heal?

[Maxwell[_2_]]

In article >, Bertie the
Bunyip says...

> HARRY POTTER > wrote in
> :
>
> > Stealth Pilot wrote:
> >
> >> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
> >> understand Dudley far better.
> >> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
> >> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
> >> flying.
> >> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
> >> enthusiasm.
> >>
> >> back in the 70's there was just such a guy in our hangar who used to
> >> talk to the newbies. I found out many years later that the boss
> >> actually employed him to sit in the hangar and talk to the students
> >> so that they would develop a robust and competent sense of
> >> airmanship. It worked because not one of his students has ever been
> >> involved in an accident that I'm aware of.
> >> his presence filled so much of our appreciation of flying that we all
> >> thought we'd spent most of our flying training with him. I was
> >> utterly shocked a few years ago to discover that I'd spent just 45
> >> minutes in the air with him as my actual instructor during my entire
> >> training.
> >>
> >> The dudley's of this world fill a little realized void in the
> >> emerging pilot's needs.
> >>
> >> so maxwell, bugger off and give him the room to do it.
> >> your all consuming jealousy for something so simple as competent
> >> advise is just amazing.
> >>
> >> Stealth Pilot
> >
> > Ugh, this is the kind of crap that makes me vomit. Piloting is not
> > some kind of religious thing. All you do is move a yoke around and
> > pull the power levers back and forth. No pilot ever is what I would
> > consider a hero.
> >
> > Dudley is nothing but an attention seeking loser who is in love with
> > himself.
> >
>
> Now THAT is a sock puppet.

Who's a sock puppet?

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Maxwell[_2_]]

In article >, JosephKK
says...

> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:33:19 -0700, Max Isn't Well
> <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote:
>
> >In article >, WindsorFox<SS> says...
> >
> >> Max Isn't Well wrote:
> >> > In article >, Bertie the
> >> > Bunyip says...
> >> >
> >> >> Max Isn't Well <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in
> >> >> :
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article >, Maxwell says...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> "Dudley Henriques" > wrote in message
> >> >>>> ...
> >> >>>>> No. Spamming is something you do for profit or gain motives. Giving
> >> >>>>> people the opportunity to get rid of you is a labor of love :-)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>> Bull****. You're spamming for another forum, and socken for Bertie,
> >> >>>> all at the same time.
> >> >>> Lets start with the basics.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Define "spam".
> >> >>>
> >> >>> (Here's free kl00 - its an acronym)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> And once you get that figured out, try "Breidbart Index"
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Which you are close to running afoul of, btw...
> >> >>>
> >> >> It's not like anyone pays attention to it anymore...
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there anyone at hime in nana-u these days?
> >> >
> >> > The last time I saw intelligent discussion in there was '98 or '99
> >> >
> >> > At this point even the trolls have abandoned it
> >> >
> >>
> >> You should probably check more often then. There has been quite a
> >> bit of discussion of googles refusal to stem abuse.
> >
> >Almost none of which has been intelligent
>
> If you are so brilliant lead the way. Let's see your method.

It's not exactly complicated. I only read and respond to topics or
poasters that interest me, and ignore the rest.

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

Stealth Pilot > wrote in
:

> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip >
> wrote:
>
>>Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
:
>>
>>> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>>>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>>>> understand Dudley far better.
>>>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>>>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>>>> flying.
>>>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>>>> enthusiasm.
>>>
>>> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't
>>> be surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of
>>> heavy duty pain medication.
>>>
>>
>>And then there's those damned warts...
>>
>>
>>
>>Bertie
>
> oh you bloody card bertie. rotflmao.

I was serious! He's poasted elsewhere about them...

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Maxwell <luv2^fly99@live.^com> wrote in news:MPG.22b6d14a1a386dce98b0c4
@notbxpats.edu:

> In article >, Bertie the
> Bunyip says...
>
>> HARRY POTTER > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > Stealth Pilot wrote:
>> >
>> >> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>> >> understand Dudley far better.
>> >> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>> >> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves
-
>> >> flying.
>> >> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>> >> enthusiasm.
>> >>
>> >> back in the 70's there was just such a guy in our hangar who used
to
>> >> talk to the newbies. I found out many years later that the boss
>> >> actually employed him to sit in the hangar and talk to the
students
>> >> so that they would develop a robust and competent sense of
>> >> airmanship. It worked because not one of his students has ever
been
>> >> involved in an accident that I'm aware of.
>> >> his presence filled so much of our appreciation of flying that we
all
>> >> thought we'd spent most of our flying training with him. I was
>> >> utterly shocked a few years ago to discover that I'd spent just 45
>> >> minutes in the air with him as my actual instructor during my
entire
>> >> training.
>> >>
>> >> The dudley's of this world fill a little realized void in the
>> >> emerging pilot's needs.
>> >>
>> >> so maxwell, bugger off and give him the room to do it.
>> >> your all consuming jealousy for something so simple as competent
>> >> advise is just amazing.
>> >>
>> >> Stealth Pilot
>> >
>> > Ugh, this is the kind of crap that makes me vomit. Piloting is not
>> > some kind of religious thing. All you do is move a yoke around and
>> > pull the power levers back and forth. No pilot ever is what I would
>> > consider a hero.
>> >
>> > Dudley is nothing but an attention seeking loser who is in love
with
>> > himself.
>> >
>>
>> Now THAT is a sock puppet.
>
> Who's a sock puppet?
>

Is this the lead in to the chorus?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

Larry Dighera > wrote in
:

> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:45:15 +0200, Martin Hotze >
> wrote in >:
>
>>Seth schrieb:
>>>> No, it's not an acronym. That's folk etymology. The term is
>>>> simply derived
>>>>from the name of the commercial food product, SPAM (made by Hormel).
>>>
>>> The term is derived from the Monty Python routine (which contained
>>> much mention of Hormel's product).
>>
>>here is the clip:
>><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE>
>>
>>> Seth
>>
>>#m
>>
>
> Here's the definition:
>
> http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
> 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
> inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as little as
> one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do you
> think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done with
> cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
> alt.rush-limbaugh and alt.politics.homosexuality will almost
> inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with troll behavior;
> the latter more specific term has become more common. ...
>


Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.

Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't proof
of anything.






Bertie

[Maxwell[_2_]]

[Maxwell[_2_]]

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>
> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't proof
> of anything.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bertie

Then why did you do so, Mr. Needsalife?

[Rich Ahrens[_2_]]

on 6/9/2008 8:47 AM Bertie the Bunyip said the following:
> Stealth Pilot > wrote in
> :
>
>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
>>> :
>>>
>>>> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>>>>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>>>>> understand Dudley far better.
>>>>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>>>>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>>>>> flying.
>>>>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>>>>> enthusiasm.
>>>> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't
>>>> be surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of
>>>> heavy duty pain medication.
>>>>
>>> And then there's those damned warts...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bertie
>> oh you bloody card bertie. rotflmao.
>
> I was serious! He's poasted elsewhere about them...

Yep:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/c308e18d1c738985

[Maxwell[_2_]]

"Rich Ahrens" > wrote in message
ouse.com...
> on 6/9/2008 8:47 AM Bertie the Bunyip said the following:
>> Stealth Pilot > wrote in
>> :
>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>>>>>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>>>>>> understand Dudley far better.
>>>>>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which probably
>>>>>> prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he totally loves -
>>>>>> flying.
>>>>>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>>>>>> enthusiasm.
>>>>> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I wouldn't
>>>>> be surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his abuse of
>>>>> heavy duty pain medication.
>>>>>
>>>> And then there's those damned warts...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>> oh you bloody card bertie. rotflmao.
>>
>> I was serious! He's poasted elsewhere about them...
>
> Yep:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/c308e18d1c738985

Cool! Where's the one about my back. I'm sure it's just as incriminating.

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in news:Twd3k.1368$Jh7.664
@newsfe21.lga:

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>>
>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't proof
>> of anything.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Then why did you do so, Mr. Needsalife?


Moi? Nevair.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@cox.^net> wrote in
:

>
> "Rich Ahrens" > wrote in message
> ouse.com...
>> on 6/9/2008 8:47 AM Bertie the Bunyip said the following:
>>> Stealth Pilot > wrote in
>>> :
>>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:484c226b$0$68532
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> on 6/8/2008 9:21 AM Stealth Pilot said the following:
>>>>>>> if you had a small modicum of compassion you would probably
>>>>>>> understand Dudley far better.
>>>>>>> my understanding is that he has a permanent injury which
>>>>>>> probably prevents him enjoying the one thing in life that he
>>>>>>> totally loves - flying.
>>>>>>> sharing his knowledge and experience is his outlet for that
>>>>>>> enthusiasm.
>>>>>> The irony is Maxie has disc problems in his back himself. I
>>>>>> wouldn't be surprised if his behavior here were indicative of his
>>>>>> abuse of heavy duty pain medication.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And then there's those damned warts...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bertie
>>>> oh you bloody card bertie. rotflmao.
>>>
>>> I was serious! He's poasted elsewhere about them...
>>
>> Yep:
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/c308e18d1c73
>> 8985
>
> Cool! Where's the one about my back. I'm sure it's just as
> incriminating.
>
>
>

You shold know!

You're maxie,right?


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2je31$fue$5
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> Here's the definition:
>>>
>>> http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
>>> 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
>>> inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as little
as
>>> one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do you
>>> think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done with
>>> cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
>>> alt.rush-limbaugh and alt.politics.homosexuality will almost
>>> inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with troll behavior;
>>> the latter more specific term has become more common. ...
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>
> The ****in jargon file? LOL!
>
>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't
proof
>> of anything.
>
> Wait 'till he discovers urbandictionary.com, where you can add/edit
> definitions.
>

He hasn't got that much imagination. He is, after all, a policeman at
heart.

Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2leod$p8r$5
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2je31$fue$5
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the definition:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
>>>>> 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
>>>>> inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as
>>>>> little
>> as
>>>>> one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do you
>>>>> think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done with
>>>>> cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
>>>>> alt.rush-limbaugh and alt.politics.homosexuality will almost
>>>>> inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with troll
>>>>> behavior; the latter more specific term has become more
>>>>> common. ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>>>
>>> The ****in jargon file? LOL!
>>>
>>>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't
>> proof
>>>> of anything.
>>>
>>> Wait 'till he discovers urbandictionary.com, where you can add/edit
>>> definitions.
>>>
>>
>> He hasn't got that much imagination. He is, after all, a policeman at
>> heart.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You know, his own post actually meets his definition of "spam" since
> it's attracting a multitude of responses that are off-topic for RAP.
>

I think his own poast meets the definition of spam since it goes well
with eggz.


Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]]

gregvk > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2lvnp$6lv$1
> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2leod$p8r$5
>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> gregvk > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2je31$fue$5
>>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's the definition:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
>>>>>>> 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
>>>>>>> inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as
>>>>>>> little
>>>> as
>>>>>>> one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do
>>>>>>> you think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done
>>>>>>> with cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
>>>>>>> alt.rush-limbaugh and alt.politics.homosexuality will
>>>>>>> almost inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with
>>>>>>> troll behavior; the latter more specific term has become
>>>>>>> more common. ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ****in jargon file? LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't
>>>> proof
>>>>>> of anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait 'till he discovers urbandictionary.com, where you can
>>>>> add/edit definitions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He hasn't got that much imagination. He is, after all, a policeman
>>>> at heart.
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> You know, his own post actually meets his definition of "spam" since
>>> it's attracting a multitude of responses that are off-topic for RAP.
>>>
>>
>> I think his own poast meets the definition of spam since it goes well
>> with eggz.
>>
>>
>> Bertie
>
> I think his own post meets the definition of spam simply because his
> last name vaguely looks/sounds kinda like "diarrhea", and that's
> off-topic for RAP.
>

I think his own post meets the definition of spam because he's as dumb
as a doorstop and my granny used to use a stale can of spam as a
doorstop.



Bertie

[More_Flaps]

On Jun 11, 5:15*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> gregvk > wrote :
>
>
>
>
>
> > Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2lvnp$6lv$1
> > @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >> gregvk > wrote in
> :
>
> >>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2leod$p8r$5
> >>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >>>> gregvk > wrote in
> :
>
> >>>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2je31$fue$5
> >>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> >>>>>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
> :
>
> >>>>>>> Here's the definition:
>
> >>>>>>> * *http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
> >>>>>>> * * 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
> >>>>>>> * * inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as
> >>>>>>> * * little
> >>>> as
> >>>>>>> * * one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do
> >>>>>>> * * you think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done
> >>>>>>> * * with cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted to
> >>>>>>> * * alt.rush-limbaugh *and alt.politics.homosexuality will
> >>>>>>> * * almost inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with
> >>>>>>> * * troll behavior; the latter more specific term has become
> >>>>>>> * * more common. ...
>
> >>>>>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>
> >>>>> The ****in jargon file? *LOL!
>
> >>>>>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself isn't
> >>>> proof
> >>>>>> of anything.
>
> >>>>> Wait 'till he discovers urbandictionary.com, where you can
> >>>>> add/edit definitions.
>
> >>>> He hasn't got that much imagination. He is, after all, a policeman
> >>>> at heart.
>
> >>>> Bertie
>
> >>> You know, his own post actually meets his definition of "spam" since
> >>> it's attracting a multitude of responses that are off-topic for RAP.
>
> >> I think his own poast meets the definition of spam since it goes well
> >> with eggz.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > I think his own post meets the definition of spam simply because his
> > last name vaguely looks/sounds kinda like "diarrhea", and that's
> > off-topic for RAP.
>
> I think his own post meets the definition of spam because he's as dumb
> as a doorstop and my granny used to use a stale can of spam as a
> doorstop.
>

Spam doesn't go stale. It grows legs and walks away if left alone for
long enough.

Cheers

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

More_Flaps > wrote in
:

> On Jun 11, 5:15*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> gregvk > wrote
>> innews:Xns9AB950AC433FFA01773E1E7C2A948@1
> 27.0.0.1:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2lvnp$6lv$1
>> > @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>> >> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> >>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2leod$p8r$5
>> >>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>> >>>> gregvk > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> >>>>> Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in news:g2je31$fue$5
>> >>>>> @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>> >>>>>> Larry Dighera > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> >>>>>>> Here's the definition:
>>
>> >>>>>>> * *http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#spam
>> >>>>>>> * * 2. To cause a newsgroup to be flooded with irrelevant or
>> >>>>>>> * * inappropriate messages. You can spam a newsgroup with as
>> >>>>>>> * * little
>> >>>> as
>> >>>>>>> * * one well- (or ill-) planned message (e.g. asking "What do
>> >>>>>>> * * you think of abortion?" on soc.women). This is often done
>> >>>>>>> * * with cross-posting (e.g. any message which is crossposted
> to
>> >>>>>>> * * alt.rush-limbaugh *and alt.politics.homosexuality will
>> >>>>>>> * * almost inevitably spam both groups). This overlaps with
>> >>>>>>> * * troll behavior; the latter more specific term has become
>> >>>>>>> * * more common. ...
>>
>> >>>>>> Nope. wrong one, fjukkwit.
>>
>> >>>>> The ****in jargon file? *LOL!
>>
>> >>>>>> Wandering around looking for definitions that suit yourself
>> >>>>>> isn't
>> >>>> proof
>> >>>>>> of anything.
>>
>> >>>>> Wait 'till he discovers urbandictionary.com, where you can
>> >>>>> add/edit definitions.
>>
>> >>>> He hasn't got that much imagination. He is, after all, a
>> >>>> policeman at heart.
>>
>> >>>> Bertie
>>
>> >>> You know, his own post actually meets his definition of "spam"
>> >>> since it's attracting a multitude of responses that are off-topic
>> >>> for RAP.
>>
>> >> I think his own poast meets the definition of spam since it goes
>> >> well with eggz.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > I think his own post meets the definition of spam simply because
>> > his last name vaguely looks/sounds kinda like "diarrhea", and
>> > that's off-topic for RAP.
>>
>> I think his own post meets the definition of spam because he's as
>> dumb as a doorstop and my granny used to use a stale can of spam as a
>> doorstop.
>>
>
> Spam doesn't go stale. It grows legs and walks away if left alone for
> long enough.

Hmm, maybe Maxie IS spam.

Bertie

[Crash Lander[_3_]]

Dudley Henriques wrote:

> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum
> and have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make
> aviation safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue
> forum that is moderated by aviation people, friendly to your
> questions and those who answer you, you might wish to consider adding
> the online forum "Pilots of America" to your list of places to hang
> out and exchange information.
>
> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>
> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take
> note of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that
> takes place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether
> exploring this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your
> time. :-))))))
>
> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience
> of the moderated aviation forum format.
>
> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.

I can't register. I fill in the registration form, and it comes with an
error that says: "The string you entered for the image verification did
not match what was displayed."
Um, there IS no verification image displayed.

--
Crash Lander
Some people say I suffer from A.D.D. but they.... OH look!! A chicken!!
http://www.straightandleveldownunder.net

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Crash Lander wrote:
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>> Just a few lines to let you know that if for any reason you student
>> pilots and the pilots and instructors who frequent this Usenet forum
>> and have devoted their time and effort freely attempting to make
>> aviation safer and educational wish to explore an alternative venue
>> forum that is moderated by aviation people, friendly to your
>> questions and those who answer you, you might wish to consider adding
>> the online forum "Pilots of America" to your list of places to hang
>> out and exchange information.
>>
>> I have explored this alternate venue and have found it to be quite
>> useful and seriously devoted to the aviation format.
>>
>> Those interested in serious aviation discussion might wish to take
>> note of any and all off topic, ad hominem, and vitriolic posting that
>> takes place under this simple announcement post in deciding whether
>> exploring this new venue might be a worthwhile expenditure of your
>> time. :-))))))
>>
>> I will continue to post here as always if for no other reason than to
>> allow those students who are serious about aviation to be able to
>> compare the Usenet experience to the potential alternative experience
>> of the moderated aviation forum format.
>>
>> Hope to see you over at Pilots of America.
>
> I can't register. I fill in the registration form, and it comes with an
> error that says: "The string you entered for the image verification did
> not match what was displayed."
> Um, there IS no verification image displayed.
>
Hi Crash;

Which forum? POA had a hacker yesterday and was down for a while.
Someone else mentioned they had registration issues there.
The Purple Board should be ok.
If any issues, try a direct contact with the administrators.
Hope you get it sorted out. There seems to be a ton of good solid
aviation people migrating to these two forums from Usenet. The posts are
"refreshing" to say the least. The atmosphere is great and believe it or
not, nobody seems inclined to discuss anything "unfriendly" :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

[Bob Noel]

In article >,
"Crash Lander" > wrote:

> I can't register. I fill in the registration form, and it comes with an
> error that says: "The string you entered for the image verification did
> not match what was displayed."
> Um, there IS no verification image displayed.

Does your browser restrict images displayed in any way?

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

[Crash Lander[_3_]]

Dudley Henriques wrote:

> Hi Crash;
>
> Which forum? POA had a hacker yesterday and was down for a while.
> Someone else mentioned they had registration issues there. The
> Purple Board should be ok. If any issues, try a direct contact with
> the administrators. Hope you get it sorted out. There seems to be a
> ton of good solid aviation people migrating to these two forums from
> Usenet. The posts are "refreshing" to say the least. The atmosphere
> is great and believe it or not, nobody seems inclined to discuss
> anything "unfriendly" :-))
>
> --
> Dudley Henriques

Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins. Hopefully
they'll get back to me.

--
Crash Lander
Some people say I suffer from A.D.D. but they.... OH look!! A chicken!!
http://www.straightandleveldownunder.net

[Crash Lander[_3_]]

Bob Noel wrote:

> Does your browser restrict images displayed in any way?

No it doesn't. Funny thing is, when I went to the "Contact Us" page, to
send them a message about it, it did display a verification image, and
I entered it in the field, and it sent the message no problems. Just
don't see a verification thing on the registration page.

--
Crash Lander
Some people say I suffer from A.D.D. but they.... OH look!! A chicken!!
http://www.straightandleveldownunder.net

[Dudley Henriques[_2_]]

Crash Lander wrote:
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>> Hi Crash;
>>
>> Which forum? POA had a hacker yesterday and was down for a while.
>> Someone else mentioned they had registration issues there. The
>> Purple Board should be ok. If any issues, try a direct contact with
>> the administrators. Hope you get it sorted out. There seems to be a
>> ton of good solid aviation people migrating to these two forums from
>> Usenet. The posts are "refreshing" to say the least. The atmosphere
>> is great and believe it or not, nobody seems inclined to discuss
>> anything "unfriendly" :-))
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins. Hopefully
> they'll get back to me.
>

Should work out for you.

These two forums are great. Good people, good sound aviation dialog, no
nonsense .
Just make yourself known as a newbie and join right in with the rest of us.

--
Dudley Henriques

[Jay Honeck[_2_]]

> Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins. Hopefully
> they'll get back to me.

It's back up and running.

I encourage you to keep trying to register. You can't imagine how wonderful
it is to be able to read and post in a Bertie-free, Maxwell-free,
sock-puppet-free forum again!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
Ercoupe N94856
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
"Crash Lander" > wrote in message
...
> Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>> Hi Crash;
>>
>> Which forum? POA had a hacker yesterday and was down for a while.
>> Someone else mentioned they had registration issues there. The
>> Purple Board should be ok. If any issues, try a direct contact with
>> the administrators. Hope you get it sorted out. There seems to be a
>> ton of good solid aviation people migrating to these two forums from
>> Usenet. The posts are "refreshing" to say the least. The atmosphere
>> is great and believe it or not, nobody seems inclined to discuss
>> anything "unfriendly" :-))
>>
>> --
>> Dudley Henriques
>
> Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins. Hopefully
> they'll get back to me.
>
> --
> Crash Lander
> Some people say I suffer from A.D.D. but they.... OH look!! A chicken!!
> http://www.straightandleveldownunder.net

[K l e i n[_2_]]

On Jun 11, 3:45 pm, "Jay Honeck" > wrote:
> > Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins. Hopefully
> > they'll get back to me.
>
> It's back up and running.
>
> I encourage you to keep trying to register. You can't imagine how wonderful
> it is to be able to read and post in a Bertie-free, Maxwell-free,
> sock-puppet-free forum again!
> --
> Jay Honeck
> Iowa City, IA
> Pathfinder N56993
> Ercoupe N94856www.AlexisParkInn.com

Yes, I can imagine. I've been reading this group in Google Groups via
Foxfire with kill files. The kill file is quite full. ;-) Besides
that, I've got a fast scroll button on my mouse to quickly roll past
anything that escapes the kill file.

K l e i n

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Jay Honeck" > wrote in
news:nIX3k.204382$yE1.201861@attbi_s21:

>> Yeah, it's the POA site. I have sent a mesage to the admins.
>> Hopefully they'll get back to me.
>
> It's back up and running.
>
> I encourage you to keep trying to register. You can't imagine how
> wonderful it is to be able to read and post in a Bertie-free,
> Maxwell-free, sock-puppet-free forum again!

Guess agian.



Bertie