PDA

View Full Version : The light bulb


Greasy Rider
March 1st 04, 08:53 PM
In an effort to lighten things up ....(play on words)



How many news group posters does it take to change a light bulb?

1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has
been changed

14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and
how the light bulb could have been changed differently

7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs

27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about
changing light bulbs

53 to flame the spell checkers

41 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ...

another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive

2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper
term is "lamp"

15 know-it-alls who claim *they* were in the industry, and
that "light bulb" is perfectly correct

156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining that they are
in violation of their "acceptable use policy"

109 to post that this group is not about light bulbs and to
please take this discussion to a lightbulb group

203 to demand that cross posting to hardware forum, off-topic
forum, and lightbulb group about changing light bulbs be
stopped

111 to defend the posting to this group saying that we all use
light bulbs and therefore the posts *are* relevant to this group

306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is
superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of
light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are
faulty

27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light
bulbs

14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then
post the corrected URL's

3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are
relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to
this group

33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety
including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"

12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because
they cannot handle the light bulb controversy

19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"

4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb FAQ

44 to ask what is a "FAQ"

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting
questions about light bulbs"

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from
now and start it all over again....




( Stolen from another newsgroup I frequent. )

Mike Marron
March 1st 04, 09:25 PM
>Greasy Rider > wrote:

>In an effort to lighten things up ....(play on words)

>How many news group posters does it take to change a light bulb?

> 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has
> been changed
>
> 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and
> how the light bulb could have been changed differently
>
> 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
>
> 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about
> changing light bulbs
>
> 53 to flame the spell checkers
>
> 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames
>
> 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ...
>
> another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive
>
> 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper
> term is "lamp"
>
> 15 know-it-alls who claim *they* were in the industry, and
> that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
>
> 156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining that they are
> in violation of their "acceptable use policy"
>
> 109 to post that this group is not about light bulbs and to
> please take this discussion to a lightbulb group
>
> 203 to demand that cross posting to hardware forum, off-topic
> forum, and lightbulb group about changing light bulbs be
> stopped
>
> 111 to defend the posting to this group saying that we all use
> light bulbs and therefore the posts *are* relevant to this group
>
> 306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is
> superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of
> light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are
> faulty
>
> 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light
> bulbs
>
> 14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then
> post the corrected URL's
>
> 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are
> relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to
> this group
>
> 33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety
> including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
>
> 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because
> they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
>
> 19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"
>
> 4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb FAQ
>
> 44 to ask what is a "FAQ"
>
> 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
>
> 143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting
> questions about light bulbs"
>
> 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from
> now and start it all over again....

> ( Stolen from another newsgroup I frequent. )

CLASSIC!

(And there's a lotta' truth in them words...)

Jim Atkins
March 1st 04, 10:25 PM
You forgot 15 to ask if we want hot XXX uncensored lightbulb pictures.

--
Jim Atkins
Twentynine Palms, CA USA

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx

Greasy Rider
March 1st 04, 10:34 PM
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:25:53 -0800, "Jim Atkins"
> disturbed the phosphur particles
on my screen with the following:

>You forgot 15 to ask if we want hot XXX uncensored lightbulb pictures.

Good one!

Oh yeah... how about lightbulb enhancement?

Guess they mean fluorescent tubes :)




PS- I noticed your anti-spamming scheme in your address. I'm told that
some new Internet engines are now tuned to delete SPAM or NOSPAM.

Jim Herring
March 2nd 04, 03:50 AM
Greasy Rider wrote:

> ( Stolen from another newsgroup I frequent. )

Well, that's the only original part. The rest has been floating around
the net for years and pops up here every now and then. At least you
didn't claim you wrote it.

As a reminder to some other posters. Trim postings. One shouldn't quote a
long message with a one sentence response.

Oh, yeah. This is subject not germane to RAM.



--
Jim

carry on




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Greasy Rider
March 2nd 04, 04:05 AM
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:50:35 -0600, Jim Herring >
disturbed the phosphur particles on my screen with the following:

>Greasy Rider wrote:
>
>> ( Stolen from another newsgroup I frequent. )
>
>Well, that's the only original part. The rest has been floating around
>the net for years and pops up here every now and then. At least you
>didn't claim you wrote it.
>
>As a reminder to some other posters. Trim postings. One shouldn't quote a
>long message with a one sentence response.
>
>Oh, yeah. This is subject not germane to RAM.

Hey Jim !
Whose a german?

I despise self appointed police.

BTW- **** you very much.

Bernardz
March 2nd 04, 12:07 PM
Lovely.


But you are forgetting the rest

4 who who show that the light globes are made for black eyes as they are
too strong for white people. It is another way the CIA and president
Bush are trying to subvert the white race.

12 who will shout them down and call them kooks.

10 who will agree that they are kooks.

7 who will discuss the history of the light globes.

13 who will discuss the military implications if Nazi Germany and/or the
communist had an efficient light globe.

2 who point out the globes that Saddam used were too weak.


--
The bouncer causes more fights then anyone at the bar. Yet the roughest
bars are those without a bouncer.

Observations of Bernard - No 49

Google