Re: ~ DEPLETED URANIUM - AMERIKA'S 'OK TO USE' WMD ~

[B2431]

>From: Phil Miller

>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver >
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
> wrote:
>>
>>>1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
>>>highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.
>>
>>Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?
>>
>>These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
>>stomach acid finish the job.
>>
>>all the best -- Dan Ford
>
>G'day Dan,
>
>As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
>but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
>it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
>go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
>more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".
>
>Plus, I enjoy the research.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Phil
>--

Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

[Phil Miller]

On 27 Mar 2004 04:53:34 GMT, (B2431) wrote:

>>From: Phil Miller
>
>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
>>>>highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.
>>>
>>>Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?
>>>
>>>These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
>>>stomach acid finish the job.
>>>
>>>all the best -- Dan Ford
>>
>>G'day Dan,
>>
>>As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
>>but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
>>it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
>>go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
>>more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".
>>
>>Plus, I enjoy the research.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Phil
>>--
>
>Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.
>
>Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Oh. Sorry. Maybe I should have used the archaic Tarvereese spelling,
lune?


Phil
--
Great Tarverisms #4

The clerk boy is practicly illiterate.

John

alt.disasters.aviation
10 November 2002

[B2431]

>From: Phil Miller

>
>On 27 Mar 2004 04:53:34 GMT, (B2431) wrote:
>
>>>From: Phil Miller
>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:30:27 -0500, Cub Driver >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:25:26 +1100, Phil Miller
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>1. Depleted Uranium is not nuclear waste in the sense that it is not the
>>>>>highly radioactive remains of spent reactor fuel.
>>>>
>>>>Phil, why waste your time and energy replying to trolls?
>>>>
>>>>These are sad, sick folks all eaten up with hate. Let their own
>>>>stomach acid finish the job.
>>>>
>>>>all the best -- Dan Ford
>>>
>>>G'day Dan,
>>>
>>>As always, the rebuttal is not for the dyed in the wool loon, or troll,
>>>but for the lurker who might assume the Loon(TM) has actually researched
>>>it's claim and it has some basis in reality. Hopefully we can make them
>>>go from "Yeah, right on (insert Loon here)." to "Oh, wait. Maybe there's
>>>more to this than (insert Loon here) claims?".
>>>
>>>Plus, I enjoy the research.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Phil
>>>--
>>
>>Phil, please don't insult loons. They are nice birds.
>>
>>Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
>
>Oh. Sorry. Maybe I should have used the archaic Tarvereese spelling,
>lune?
>
>
>Phil

Actually that fool spells it "lun."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired