Make chief of NORAD testify to 9-11 panel

[Laura Bush murdered her boy friend]

The traitor's name is General Ralph Eberhart and he was commander in
chief of NORAD on 9-11. It's his job to sendup jets to investigate
planes flying off course but on 9-11 he let FOUR commercial jets fly
HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly TWO hours till they crashed
into our buildings. And he has never been disciplined for his
horrific failure. The 9-11 panel needs to put this traitor on TV and
ask him why he failed so utterly to do his sworn duty that day.

http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/aviation/

[Thomas J. Paladino Jr.]

<Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote in message
...
> The traitor's name is General Ralph Eberhart and he was commander in
> chief of NORAD on 9-11. It's his job to sendup jets to investigate
> planes flying off course but on 9-11 he let FOUR commercial jets fly
> HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly TWO hours till they crashed
> into our buildings. And he has never been disciplined for his
> horrific failure. The 9-11 panel needs to put this traitor on TV and
> ask him why he failed so utterly to do his sworn duty that day.


Hate to break it to you, but before 9/11 it was not his job, nor anyone
elses, to scramble fighter jets just to investigate planes flying
off-course. In fact, the US did not even keep fighter jets on a ready status
pre-9/11.

But I know that people like you don't let mere facts get in the way of a
good conspiracy theory.

[Laura Bush murdered her boy friend]

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:23:06 GMT, "Thomas J. Paladino Jr."
> wrote:

>
><Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote in message
...
>> The traitor's name is General Ralph Eberhart and he was commander in
>> chief of NORAD on 9-11. It's his job to sendup jets to investigate
>> planes flying off course but on 9-11 he let FOUR commercial jets fly
>> HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly TWO hours till they crashed
>> into our buildings. And he has never been disciplined for his
>> horrific failure. The 9-11 panel needs to put this traitor on TV and
>> ask him why he failed so utterly to do his sworn duty that day.
>
>
>Hate to break it to you, but before 9/11 it was not his job, nor anyone
>elses, to scramble fighter jets just to investigate planes flying
>off-course. In fact, the US did not even keep fighter jets on a ready status
>pre-9/11.
>
>But I know that people like you don't let mere facts get in the way of a
>good conspiracy theory.
>

Oh shut up, you lying piece of ****. It was too the job of NORAD.
Has been for decades and you know it. You're as shameless a liar as
your god bush and it gives me great enjoyment to know that come
judgement day, you two will suffer unspeakable agony in the
everlasting fires of hell for your lies. HAHA

[Thomas J. Paladino Jr.]

<Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:23:06 GMT, "Thomas J. Paladino Jr."
> > wrote:
>
> >
> ><Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote in message
> ...
> >> The traitor's name is General Ralph Eberhart and he was commander in
> >> chief of NORAD on 9-11. It's his job to sendup jets to investigate
> >> planes flying off course but on 9-11 he let FOUR commercial jets fly
> >> HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly TWO hours till they crashed
> >> into our buildings. And he has never been disciplined for his
> >> horrific failure. The 9-11 panel needs to put this traitor on TV and
> >> ask him why he failed so utterly to do his sworn duty that day.
> >
> >
> >Hate to break it to you, but before 9/11 it was not his job, nor anyone
> >elses, to scramble fighter jets just to investigate planes flying
> >off-course. In fact, the US did not even keep fighter jets on a ready
status
> >pre-9/11.
> >
> >But I know that people like you don't let mere facts get in the way of a
> >good conspiracy theory.
> >
>
> Oh shut up, you lying piece of ****. It was too the job of NORAD.
> Has been for decades and you know it. You're as shameless a liar as
> your god bush and it gives me great enjoyment to know that come
> judgement day, you two will suffer unspeakable agony in the
> everlasting fires of hell for your lies. HAHA
>

No, it was not the job of NORAD to scramble armed fighter jets every time a
plane went off course (which in and of itself, was/is not terribly
uncommon). True, he could have ordered fighers into the air to investigate,
but to prep and arm a set of 'cold' fighters would have probably taken over
an hour, as we simply did not keep armed fighters at the ready pre-9/11. It
also would have been fairly unprescidented. The only time I can think of was
the Payne Stewart incident when his learjet lost pressure and flew around
aimlessly; there just happened to be a pair of F-16s on practice manuvers at
a nearby MOA, so they were easily requested and vectored in by the local air
traffic controller. They were not scrambled specifically, and NORAD had
nothing to do with it; it was all local. There was simply no real plan on
the books to deal with something like 9/11, period; not at NORAD or anyplace
else.

Again, I know that you people won't let facts get in the way of your lunatic
theories, but just in case any non-loons are reading....

[BUFDRVR]

>No, it was not the job of NORAD to scramble armed fighter jets every time a
>plane went off course

Which pre-9/11 they wouldn't know about anyway since *all* of NORADs sensors
were pointed *outward*. Since 9/11 they have gotten an FAA feed into their
respective HQs, but even this wasn't completed for nearly a year after 9/11/01.

Thank God they still won't scramble fighters for NORDO aircraft or off course
jets, this would be a 24/7/365 operation....and that's just responding to the
wayward B-52s from the Formal Training Unit ;)


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

[Matt Wiser]

I'd say the original poster is still thinking of NORAD in the 50s and 60s,
where every air defense unit had fighters on Alert 5 waiting for the Bears
and Bisons to come over the Pole. Once Ivan began relying on ICBMs, the need
for large numbers of interceptors declined. Tom is right: facts never get
in the way of a conspiracy theory; name the event and you'll find theories
that fly in the face of fact-Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima, to name a couple.


"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." > wrote:
>
><Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote in
>message
...
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:23:06 GMT, "Thomas
>J. Paladino Jr."
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><Laura Bush murdered her boy friend> wrote
>in message
>> ...
>> >> The traitor's name is General Ralph Eberhart
>and he was commander in
>> >> chief of NORAD on 9-11. It's his job to
>sendup jets to investigate
>> >> planes flying off course but on 9-11 he
>let FOUR commercial jets fly
>> >> HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly
>TWO hours till they crashed
>> >> into our buildings. And he has never
>been disciplined for his
>> >> horrific failure. The 9-11 panel needs
>to put this traitor on TV and
>> >> ask him why he failed so utterly to do
>his sworn duty that day.
>> >
>> >
>> >Hate to break it to you, but before 9/11
>it was not his job, nor anyone
>> >elses, to scramble fighter jets just to investigate
>planes flying
>> >off-course. In fact, the US did not even
>keep fighter jets on a ready
>status
>> >pre-9/11.
>> >
>> >But I know that people like you don't let
>mere facts get in the way of a
>> >good conspiracy theory.
>> >
>>
>> Oh shut up, you lying piece of ****. It was
>too the job of NORAD.
>> Has been for decades and you know it. You're
>as shameless a liar as
>> your god bush and it gives me great enjoyment
>to know that come
>> judgement day, you two will suffer unspeakable
>agony in the
>> everlasting fires of hell for your lies. HAHA
>>
>
>No, it was not the job of NORAD to scramble
>armed fighter jets every time a
>plane went off course (which in and of itself,
>was/is not terribly
>uncommon). True, he could have ordered fighers
>into the air to investigate,
>but to prep and arm a set of 'cold' fighters
>would have probably taken over
>an hour, as we simply did not keep armed fighters
>at the ready pre-9/11. It
>also would have been fairly unprescidented.
>The only time I can think of was
>the Payne Stewart incident when his learjet
>lost pressure and flew around
>aimlessly; there just happened to be a pair
>of F-16s on practice manuvers at
>a nearby MOA, so they were easily requested
>and vectored in by the local air
>traffic controller. They were not scrambled
>specifically, and NORAD had
>nothing to do with it; it was all local. There
>was simply no real plan on
>the books to deal with something like 9/11,
>period; not at NORAD or anyplace
>else.
>
>Again, I know that you people won't let facts
>get in the way of your lunatic
>theories, but just in case any non-loons are
>reading....
>
>
>
>
>
>


Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

[WalterM140]

>. It's his job to sendup jets to investigate
>planes flying off course but on 9-11 he let FOUR commercial jets fly
>HUNDREDS of miles off course for nearly TWO hours till they crashed
>into our buildings.

I had the impression that the two planes, at least, left Logan and were in the
vicinity of NYC a few minutes later.

The one that crashed in PA flew outbound for @ 30 minutes before the jihadists
attacked the crew and had crashed within 30 minutes of that. That's what I
recall.

An airliner could fly @ 1,000 miles in two hours. That didn't happen. It
wasn't required.

Perhaps you will elaborate.

Walt