PDA

View Full Version : Boeing Buys Ads to Defend Proposed Tanker Deal


Henry J Cobb
May 5th 04, 06:15 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2078-2004May4.html
> The report is expected to conclude that the current tanker fleet needs
> to be modernized and that it would be too expensive to simply put new
> engines in the 40-year-old airframes, according to sources familiar
> with the report. But it also says that the Pentagon does not need to
> decide how to pursue that modernization immediately, the sources said
>
> The Pentagon could consider several options, including performing an
> analysis of alternatives, buying used planes from airlines and turning
> them into tankers or using a private leasing service to augment the
> current capacity, according to the sources familiar with the report.

-HJC
Boeing, Boeing, Gone.

Nemo l'Ancien
May 5th 04, 12:59 PM
Or buying Airbuses...

John Cook
May 5th 04, 01:12 PM
On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:59:26 +0200, Nemo l'Ancien
> wrote:

>
>Or buying Airbuses...

Now what makes me think thats a tad unlikely!, The airbus's are at a
huge disadvantage, in Fuel load, Range limit, and Size, they are
barely adequate.....

At least thats what the request for tenders looked like after Boeing
wrote/rewrote it for the USAF, the USAF seem to want a smaller fuel
load, over a shorter distance, and don't really want to muck about
with all that cargo stuff either, and are quite happy to pay top
dollar for that exact sort of capability.

Viola!!! Boeing wins...

cheers






John Cook

Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All
opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them.

Email Address :-
Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me
Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk

The Raven
May 5th 04, 01:20 PM
"John Cook" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:59:26 +0200, Nemo l'Ancien
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >Or buying Airbuses...
>
> Now what makes me think thats a tad unlikely!, The airbus's are at a
> huge disadvantage, in Fuel load, Range limit, and Size, they are
> barely adequate.....
>
> At least thats what the request for tenders looked like after Boeing
> wrote/rewrote it for the USAF, the USAF seem to want a smaller fuel
> load, over a shorter distance, and don't really want to muck about
> with all that cargo stuff either, and are quite happy to pay top
> dollar for that exact sort of capability.
>
> Viola!!!

Viola???

>Boeing wins...

Airbus wins in Australia.


--
The Raven
http://www.80scartoons.co.uk/batfinkquote.mp3
** President of the ozemail.* and uunet.* NG's
** since August 15th 2000.

Nemo l'Ancien
May 5th 04, 02:23 PM
I don't think so...
We shall see

Nemo l'Ancien
May 5th 04, 02:28 PM
Or, like you say in English "Wait and see"

Google