beech tc-45g

[Glen in Orlando[_4_]]

--
Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes

[Orval Fairbairn[_2_]]

In article >,
"Glen in Orlando" > wrote:


Now, THAT'S a Twin Beech! ;>)

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

[Wayne Paul]

Glen,

During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2. Just like you
see painted on the fuselage. (I have a few hours in one of these; however,
it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log book as a
TC-45.)

Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/



"Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message
g.com...
>
>
> --
> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>
>

[Peter Twydell]

In message >, Wayne Paul
> writes
>Glen,
>
>During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2. Just like you
>see painted on the fuselage. (I have a few hours in one of these; however,
>it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log book as a
>TC-45.)
>

Slip of the finger there, Wayne. The Beech designation is SNB-2 (see
rear fuselage). The SNJ was the NA T-6 Texan/Harvard.

>Wayne
>http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
>"Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message
g.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>

Splendid picture of a handsome aeroplane. What a colour scheme!
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

[Glen in Orlando[_4_]]

cool...
I can only go by what the N-Number database says... the deeper stuff is
beyond me...
when I walk out on my company ramp to fly each night I see an MD-11, 757 &
A300... Thank god.. cause if there were two 757's i'd be screwed!! GRIN!!
Glen in Orlando


"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
m...
> Glen,
>
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2. Just like
> you see painted on the fuselage. (I have a few hours in one of these;
> however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log
> book as a TC-45.)
>
> Wayne
> http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
> "Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message
> g.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>
>>
>
>

[Glen in Orlando[_4_]]

cool...
I can only go by what the N-Number database says... the deeper stuff is
beyond me...
when I walk out on my company ramp to fly each night I see an MD-11, 757 &
A300... Thank god.. cause if there were two 757's i'd be screwed!! GRIN!!
Glen in Orlando


"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message
m...
> Glen,
>
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2. Just like
> you see painted on the fuselage. (I have a few hours in one of these;
> however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log
> book as a TC-45.)
>
> Wayne
> http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
> "Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message
> g.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>
>>
>
>

[Robert Moore]

"Wayne Paul" wrote
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2. Just
> like you see painted on the fuselage. (I have a few hours in one of
> these; however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded
> in my log book as a TC-45.)

Yep! My hours came at NAS Norfolk during 1962-64, while attached to
FAETULANT. (Fleet Airborne Electronics Training Unit-Atlantic). We
junior aviator types normally flew our 8 hours per month proficiency
time in T-28s and S-2s, but our CO was more comfortable in the TC-45J.
He would naturally drag one of us along with him to split the flight
time.....or keep him alive. :-)

Bob Moore
PanAm (retired)