Keith Willshaw
July 4th 04, 11:27 PM
"Denyav" > wrote in message
...
> >> Nice way of dodging some questions.
> >>
> >
> >Nope its an accurate answer
>
> Very obviously.
>
> >public hearing before the
> >committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral
> >Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by
> >their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee
> >counsel to be asked other.
>
> Monkey investigation designed by the designers of Pearl Harbor conspiracy
to
> white wash their actions .Members of congress were only allowed to see
what
> they allowed to see at that time.
Quite the contary, the members of congress drove the inquiry
and were not part of the 1941 administration
> See the minority report of the same.
>
> >Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised.
> Yeah Right,you made it clear before,every evidence if it points to a
direction
> other than offical direction is irrelevant.
>
>
> >And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive
> >http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html
> >
>
> Yet the very same Stinnett claims that all Crane documents about
intercepted
> pre-Pearl Harbor JN25B dispatches have been removed from Archive II
because of
> NSA withdrawal notices and none of then are available to public scholars
or
> even Congressmen.
Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the
National Archive and that he got them from there
> And thats the truth you can check it for yourself.
I have
> NSA have issued almost three dozen withdrawal notices for Crane documents
up to
> this date,almost all of them affecting solely pre Pearl Harbor documents.
>
Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional
inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date
> >They stated not
> >
> I am sure Sen.Thurman and Rep.Spence would strongly disagree with your
> statement.
>
> >Hardly
> Yeah right,then you must ask Marshall why he offered his resignation upon
this
> report?
>
He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed
> >No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in
> >1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources
> >away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis
> >were only 150 miles away from
>
> Actually nobody really wanted a war with Japan,but Japan
was,unfortunately the
> key to thrust America,a country with a big German-American population but
ruled
> by an Anglo-American minority,into the war aganist Germany .
>
Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to
war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR
> "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it
more
> difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the
> circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat"
> Zbigniew Brzezinski
> Grand Chessboard 1997.
>
More irrelevance
> The architect of Afghan trap was right on 1941,he was also proven right in
> 2001.
> >There arent too many southern baptists in London old son.
>
> But the threat the London face now is much bigger than the threat
represented
> by the corporal or by the French Fleet,England survived under Roman rule
and
> would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say
at
> least.
Aint no threat from bananas bwana
> Israelis have waited 2000 years to return to their homeland,they could
easily
> wait for another 200 years to create the Greater Israel,but its very
doubtful
> if England and London could afford to wait for 20 years.
>
So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain !
ROTFLMAO
Keith
...
> >> Nice way of dodging some questions.
> >>
> >
> >Nope its an accurate answer
>
> Very obviously.
>
> >public hearing before the
> >committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral
> >Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by
> >their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee
> >counsel to be asked other.
>
> Monkey investigation designed by the designers of Pearl Harbor conspiracy
to
> white wash their actions .Members of congress were only allowed to see
what
> they allowed to see at that time.
Quite the contary, the members of congress drove the inquiry
and were not part of the 1941 administration
> See the minority report of the same.
>
> >Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised.
> Yeah Right,you made it clear before,every evidence if it points to a
direction
> other than offical direction is irrelevant.
>
>
> >And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive
> >http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html
> >
>
> Yet the very same Stinnett claims that all Crane documents about
intercepted
> pre-Pearl Harbor JN25B dispatches have been removed from Archive II
because of
> NSA withdrawal notices and none of then are available to public scholars
or
> even Congressmen.
Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the
National Archive and that he got them from there
> And thats the truth you can check it for yourself.
I have
> NSA have issued almost three dozen withdrawal notices for Crane documents
up to
> this date,almost all of them affecting solely pre Pearl Harbor documents.
>
Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional
inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date
> >They stated not
> >
> I am sure Sen.Thurman and Rep.Spence would strongly disagree with your
> statement.
>
> >Hardly
> Yeah right,then you must ask Marshall why he offered his resignation upon
this
> report?
>
He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed
> >No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in
> >1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources
> >away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis
> >were only 150 miles away from
>
> Actually nobody really wanted a war with Japan,but Japan
was,unfortunately the
> key to thrust America,a country with a big German-American population but
ruled
> by an Anglo-American minority,into the war aganist Germany .
>
Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to
war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR
> "As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it
more
> difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the
> circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat"
> Zbigniew Brzezinski
> Grand Chessboard 1997.
>
More irrelevance
> The architect of Afghan trap was right on 1941,he was also proven right in
> 2001.
> >There arent too many southern baptists in London old son.
>
> But the threat the London face now is much bigger than the threat
represented
> by the corporal or by the French Fleet,England survived under Roman rule
and
> would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say
at
> least.
Aint no threat from bananas bwana
> Israelis have waited 2000 years to return to their homeland,they could
easily
> wait for another 200 years to create the Greater Israel,but its very
doubtful
> if England and London could afford to wait for 20 years.
>
So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain !
ROTFLMAO
Keith