Airshows should be banned...Now!

[Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast]

My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
banned and I mean banned immediately.

Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

[Pete]

"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote
> My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
> Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

How many people died or were injured last year in car crashes?
How many in air shows?

How many people died or were injured last year in swimming pools?
How many in air shows?

How many people died or were injured last year in soccer match brawls last
year?
How many in air shows?

Your opinion is worth what, exactly?

Pete

[Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast]

On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:53:19 GMT, "Pete" > wrote:

>
>"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote
>> My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>> overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>> banned and I mean banned immediately.
>>
>> Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>
>How many people died or were injured last year in car crashes?
>How many in air shows?
>
>How many people died or were injured last year in swimming pools?
>How many in air shows?
>
>How many people died or were injured last year in soccer match brawls last
>year?
>How many in air shows?
>
>Your opinion is worth what, exactly?
---
Quite a lot, since so many people including yourself, respond to me.
Automobile travel is a necessity for most, airshows, quite franky,
aren't. One death at an airshow is cause enough to cancel the whole
lot, in my view. What purpose do they serve other than thrill a bunch
of overweight loons with poor social skills and short attention spans
like.....well, you, for instance.

Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

[Pete]

"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote
> ---
> Quite a lot, since so many people including yourself, respond to me.
> Automobile travel is a necessity for most, airshows, quite franky,
> aren't. One death at an airshow is cause enough to cancel the whole
> lot, in my view. What purpose do they serve other than thrill a bunch
> of overweight loons with poor social skills and short attention spans
> like.....well, you, for instance.
>

How perceptive of you that you can determine my weigh and attention span
from a short usenet post.

That's the great thing about society. You can have your opinion. Doesn't
make it a *good* opinion, but there it is.

Pete

[B2431]

>From: Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>
>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

Good thing the choice isn't yours. I have been to a number of airshows over my
life span and weight isn't an issue. It is obvious you just want to stir up
trouble, please do it elsewhere.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[B2431]

>From: Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>

>Automobile travel is a necessity for most, airshows, quite franky,
>aren't. One death at an airshow is cause enough to cancel the whole
>lot, in my view. What purpose do they serve other than thrill a bunch
>of overweight loons with poor social skills and short attention spans
>like.....well, you, for instance.
>
>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

Using that logic, and ignoring your character assasinations, pleasure boating,
theme parks, bicycle racing, camping..and almost all forms of out door
recreation/entertainment should be banned isnce people have died or suffered
severe injury in all of them.

I now relegate you to the island of lost causes and wannabes along with tarver,
maron, vox etc.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Vaughn]

"Pete" > wrote in message
...
>
> How many people died or were injured last year in car crashes?
> How many in air shows?
>
Pete; You are attempting to make a rational response to an obvious
troll-post. Self-abuse would be a far better use of your time.

Vaughn

[Krztalizer]

>
>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>

Overweight weenies, eh? I take it you've never been to one...? Other than
troll, what do you do for excitement?

[Pete]

"Vaughn" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Pete" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > How many people died or were injured last year in car crashes?
> > How many in air shows?
> >
> Pete; You are attempting to make a rational response to an obvious
> troll-post. Self-abuse would be a far better use of your time.
>

Yeah, I know. Sometimes ya just can't help but poke the monkey with a stick.

Pete

[Scott Ferrin]

On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> wrote:

>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast


Loser.

[Larry]

"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote in message
s.com...
> My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
> Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
And I suppose you are against the draft?

Kill the airshows and 'volunteer enlistments' will DEFINITELY take a
nosedive!

Besides- the statistics do not support your opinion. It's safer to watch the
airshow than it is to drive to and from.


Larry
AECS (AW/SW/MTS)
USN 'Retired'
20 years if gettin 'em off the pointy end
AND safely home again!

[Tamas Feher]

>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>banned and I mean banned immediately.

Air shows are dangerous and bad for the natural environment, a lot of
kerosene is burned.

Also, at a time when owning a civilian Hummer virtually makes you an oil
and pollution nazi in public opinion, not only citizens, but the
military should scale back its consumption of fossil fuel.

[Keith Willshaw]

"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote in message
s.com...
> My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
> Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast

Troll rating 1/10

A poor effort

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George Z. Bush]

<Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> > wrote:
>
> >My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> >overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> >banned and I mean banned immediately.
> >
> >Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>
>
> Loser.

Why? For expressing an opinion that differs from yours? You make me wonder who
the loser really is.

George Z.

[Scott Ferrin]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:13:34 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
> wrote:

>
><Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
>> On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>> >overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>> >banned and I mean banned immediately.
>> >
>> >Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>>
>>
>> Loser.
>
>Why? For expressing an opinion that differs from yours? You make me wonder who
>the loser really is.

Well I'd start with taking a look in the mirror. You're obviously not
too bright if you can't recognize a troll for what it is.

[Kevin Brooks]

"George Z. Bush" > wrote in message
...
>
> <Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> > >overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> > >banned and I mean banned immediately.
> > >
> > >Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> >
> >
> > Loser.
>
> Why? For expressing an opinion that differs from yours? You make me
wonder who
> the loser really is.

I realize you are quite slow on the uptake, but you missed the evident troll
attempt? He is indeed a loser.

Brooks

>
> George Z.
>
>

[Stephen Harding]

Keith Willshaw wrote:

> "Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote in message
>
>>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>>banned and I mean banned immediately.
>>
>>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>
> Troll rating 1/10
>
> A poor effort

But the *name* Keith, the *name*!

"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast"!

Surely it's worth another point.


SMH

[George Z. Bush]

<Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:13:34 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> ><Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
> ...
> >> On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> >> >overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> >> >banned and I mean banned immediately.
> >> >
> >> >Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> >>
> >>
> >> Loser.
> >
> >Why? For expressing an opinion that differs from yours? You make me wonder
who
> >the loser really is.
>
> Well I'd start with taking a look in the mirror. You're obviously not
> too bright if you can't recognize a troll for what it is.

How very clever you are. I no longer have to wonder who the loser is since I
know it's not me and you've eliminated all doubt regarding his identity. The
rest of us would ignore a troll and not bother responding, but you, of course
felt obliged to toss your insult out there. Well, we can't protect you from
yourself, can we!

George Z.

[George Z. Bush]

"Stephen Harding" > wrote in message
...
> Keith Willshaw wrote:
>
> > "Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote in message
> >
> >>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> >>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> >>banned and I mean banned immediately.
> >>
> >>Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
> >
> > Troll rating 1/10
> >
> > A poor effort
>
> But the *name* Keith, the *name*!
>
> "Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast"!
>
> Surely it's worth another point.

I agree.....that kind of imagination deserves recognition! (^-^)))

George Z.

[Scott Ferrin]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:15:38 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
> wrote:

>
><Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:13:34 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:22:15 GMT, Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>> >> >overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>> >> >banned and I mean banned immediately.
>> >> >
>> >> >Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Loser.
>> >
>> >Why? For expressing an opinion that differs from yours? You make me wonder
>who
>> >the loser really is.
>>
>> Well I'd start with taking a look in the mirror. You're obviously not
>> too bright if you can't recognize a troll for what it is.
>
>How very clever you are. I no longer have to wonder who the loser is since I
>know it's not me



With a sig like your's you're sure impressing the hell out of the rest
of us.



>and you've eliminated all doubt regarding his identity. The
>rest of us would ignore a troll and not bother responding, but you, of course
>felt obliged to toss your insult out there. Well, we can't protect you from
>yourself, can we!
>
>George Z.
>

[George Z. Bush]

<Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:15:38 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
> > wrote:

> With a sig like your's you're sure impressing the hell out of the rest
> of us.

I don't know why it bothers you.....it doesn't seem to bother anybody else.
BTW, when did you start speaking for the rest of us? Did I miss the election?

George Z.

[Nemo l'Ancien]

Encore un jalou qui peut pas bander...Alors, il em..... les autres...

[Steve]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:13:50 +0200, "Tamas Feher" >
wrote:

>Air shows are dangerous and bad for the natural environment, a lot of
>kerosene is burned.

Well, I'm feeling a little light headed, so I'll just go and stand behind
this 747 and inhale some of that sweet clean air.


--
Steve.

[Scott Ferrin]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:13:50 +0200, "Tamas Feher" >
wrote:

>>My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
>>overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
>>banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
>Air shows are dangerous and bad for the natural environment, a lot of
>kerosene is burned.
>
>Also, at a time when owning a civilian Hummer virtually makes you an oil
>and pollution nazi in public opinion, not only citizens, but the
>military should scale back its consumption of fossil fuel.

I agree, nuclear power all the way. Actually what they burn is a drop
in the bucket. I'll tell you what, why don't you do you part and
shutdown all your utilities. Yeah, that's about what I thought. At
least the military is serving a purpose other than your own personal
convenience. Airshows are PR. PR gets recruits. Recruits allow you
to waste time looking down your nose from on high and consider things
other than basic survival.

[Scott Ferrin]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:06:35 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
> wrote:

>
><Scott Ferrin> wrote in message
...
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:15:38 -0400, "George Z. Bush"
>> > wrote:
>
>> With a sig like your's you're sure impressing the hell out of the rest
>> of us.
>
>I don't know why it bothers you.....it doesn't seem to bother anybody else.
>BTW, when did you start speaking for the rest of us? Did I miss the election?


Some things are so obvious they don't require an elected official.

[JStONGE123]

shut up, ya queer.




The Durango 95 purred away real horrorshow. A nice warm vibratey feeling all
through your guttiwuts.

[Zamboni]

"Steve" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:13:50 +0200, "Tamas Feher" >
> wrote:
>
> >Air shows are dangerous and bad for the natural environment, a lot of
> >kerosene is burned.
>
> Well, I'm feeling a little light headed, so I'll just go and stand behind
> this 747 and inhale some of that sweet clean air.
>
Actually, the air about 500 yards back from the 747 is probably fairly
clean, which is where you'll land after the engines power up. :)
--
Zamboni

[B2431]

>From: "Zamboni"
>
>
>"Steve" > wrote in message
...
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:13:50 +0200, "Tamas Feher" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Air shows are dangerous and bad for the natural environment, a lot of
>> >kerosene is burned.
>>
>> Well, I'm feeling a little light headed, so I'll just go and stand behind
>> this 747 and inhale some of that sweet clean air.
>>
>Actually, the air about 500 yards back from the 747 is probably fairly
>clean, which is where you'll land after the engines power up. :)
>--
>Zamboni

Not if there's a blast fence behind the aircraft in which case there's a
question as to how many pieces will depart the body on impact.

Dan, U.S.Air Force, retired

[Eric Joiner]

Then stay home Jack ass.

You're breathing my air.


"Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast" > wrote in message
s.com...
> My view, too dangerous and too expensive just to thrill a bunch of
> overweight weenies. Military airshows, in particular, should be
> banned and I mean banned immediately.
>
> Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast