Re: Please Someone Invade My Country

[Denyav]

>The US doesn't even have a democratically-elected president any
>more.....!!!
>What would the founding fathers have made of that?!?!?!?!

Duties of US president is mainly ceremonial,he is basically a butler who
supposed to serve meals cooked by the chief cooks to the people.
So elected president or selected president that does make much
difference,unless you can elect the chief cook.

[Leslie Swartz]

1) The U.S. President isn't supposed to be "democratically elected."

2) We don't even know *who* "won the popular vote." The difference was
well within the margin of error. The balloting machines themselves have
margins of error around 3%; add in all the fraud and shenanigans and you
need a difference of at least 12% to have any confidence in the result.

Steve Swartz

"Denyav" > wrote in message
...
> >The US doesn't even have a democratically-elected president any
> >more.....!!!
> >What would the founding fathers have made of that?!?!?!?!
>
> Duties of US president is mainly ceremonial,he is basically a butler who
> supposed to serve meals cooked by the chief cooks to the people.
> So elected president or selected president that does make much
> difference,unless you can elect the chief cook.

[Lyle]

On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:22:01 -0400, "Leslie Swartz"
> wrote:

>1) The U.S. President isn't supposed to be "democratically elected."
>
>2) We don't even know *who* "won the popular vote." The difference was
>well within the margin of error. The balloting machines themselves have
>margins of error around 3%; add in all the fraud and shenanigans and you
>need a difference of at least 12% to have any confidence in the result.
>
>Steve Swartz
>
>"Denyav" > wrote in message
...
>> >The US doesn't even have a democratically-elected president any
>> >more.....!!!
>> >What would the founding fathers have made of that?!?!?!?!
>>
>> Duties of US president is mainly ceremonial,he is basically a butler who
>> supposed to serve meals cooked by the chief cooks to the people.
>> So elected president or selected president that does make much
>> difference,unless you can elect the chief cook.
>
if the USA were a democracy, like the liberials want it to be, and do
a popular vote, and not a vote of the states, a president would spend
all thier time and money in the major cites like NEW York, SAN FRAN,
LA, Chicago, and tell the rest of the country to go to hell. But in
our system every state has a say, no matter how small. And if we went
to a popular vote for president, we would no longer be the United
States.

Just my opionon.