I'm not sure about how the Canadian Regs would apply to such a thing
(actually this thread is the first I've heard of it) but there has been
a NOTAM out for an area near Winchester ON for a while:

060185 CYND WINCHESTER
CNA8 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE OPS 3 NM RADIUS 450610N 752854W (APRX
8 NM NW AD) EXCLUDING CYA528, MONITORING 126.7 SFC TO 1000 FT MSL
TIL 0611302359

Given the location (and the lack of anything more obvious I can think
of), this could be testing for such a device.

Fred

Icebound wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:32:48 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote in fOjxg.16598$Nv.10337@fed1read10::


"Crop Cam" ... Coming soon to a cornfield/airspace near you?

http://cropcam.com/index.htm


In Canada, Transport Canada has approved the CropCam to fly up to
a maximum altitude of 2200 feet. To ensure compliance the CropCam
is altitude is pre-set at 2100 feet. For other countries, please
consult with your regulatory body.

Does this mean that the see-and-avoid regulation is waived at some
altitude AGL in Canada?



I don't know where the vendor got that 2200 foot AGL number, except that is
one of the common numbers that is often the base of controlled airspace in
Canada... that is: where it is not 700 feet or 1200 feet or surface, etc..

But Transport Canada specifically says that a "model airplane" must be flown
for recreational purposes..., and so, unless TC is making some kind of
waiver, it would be pretty hard for them to class a duty-specific UAV such
as this as a "model airplane" .

As a UAV, it would require a "Special Flight Operations Certificate",
whatever that may entail.

http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/ge...d/section2.htm


appears to be one of the relevant documents and I don't see anything in
there allowing them to operate freely below 2200. There is no waiver of
see-and-avoid that I am aware of.

...

Probably just NOTAM their activities just like para or glider ops do,I
suppose????