A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Agricultural UAV



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th 06, 09:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Fred G. Black[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Agricultural UAV

I'm not sure about how the Canadian Regs would apply to such a thing
(actually this thread is the first I've heard of it) but there has been
a NOTAM out for an area near Winchester ON for a while:

060185 CYND WINCHESTER
CNA8 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE OPS 3 NM RADIUS 450610N 752854W (APRX
8 NM NW AD) EXCLUDING CYA528, MONITORING 126.7 SFC TO 1000 FT MSL
TIL 0611302359

Given the location (and the lack of anything more obvious I can think
of), this could be testing for such a device.

Fred

Icebound wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:32:48 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote in fOjxg.16598$Nv.10337@fed1read10::


"Crop Cam" ... Coming soon to a cornfield/airspace near you?

http://cropcam.com/index.htm


In Canada, Transport Canada has approved the CropCam to fly up to
a maximum altitude of 2200 feet. To ensure compliance the CropCam
is altitude is pre-set at 2100 feet. For other countries, please
consult with your regulatory body.

Does this mean that the see-and-avoid regulation is waived at some
altitude AGL in Canada?



I don't know where the vendor got that 2200 foot AGL number, except that is
one of the common numbers that is often the base of controlled airspace in
Canada... that is: where it is not 700 feet or 1200 feet or surface, etc..

But Transport Canada specifically says that a "model airplane" must be flown
for recreational purposes..., and so, unless TC is making some kind of
waiver, it would be pretty hard for them to class a duty-specific UAV such
as this as a "model airplane" .

As a UAV, it would require a "Special Flight Operations Certificate",
whatever that may entail.

http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/ge...d/section2.htm


appears to be one of the relevant documents and I don't see anything in
there allowing them to operate freely below 2200. There is no waiver of
see-and-avoid that I am aware of.

...

Probably just NOTAM their activities just like para or glider ops do,I
suppose????


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.