![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are summaries of Frank Irving’s 1981 OSTIV paper that say he
concluded the optimal CG for a standard class glider is 0.3 to 0.35 of the Mean Aerodynamic Chord. DG’s web site has an entry that says the 2001 Akaflieg Braunschweig flight test results concluded best glider results are obtained when the CG is 30-35% in front of the rear CG limit. I can calculate an optimal CG for my LS8-18 using the Akaflieg Braunschweig results quite easily. However, I can't calculate an optimal CG using Frank Irving’s results, because RS doesn't provide the length or starting position of the MAC. Are these two results in agreement? If not, is there some way for getting them into the same frame of reference? (I'd prefer restating Irving’s results in terms of CG rather than MAC, if possible.) Or have these findings been superceded by something else in the last 8 years? -John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need a little more range for your 304S jet? | Marc Ramsey[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | July 22nd 07 01:39 PM |
VOR volume range | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | February 7th 07 10:46 PM |
Long range Wx | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 4 | December 31st 04 04:25 PM |
What is the range of the B-1B? | user | Military Aviation | 10 | December 24th 03 04:15 AM |
Fuel Range | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 2 | November 14th 03 12:51 PM |