![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only having been a pilot for 2-years I can honestly say that this is the
most ridiculous "Russian Roulette" regulation I have seen yet. "Roger Long" om wrote in message ... Say, this really looks to be for real. AOPA just advised me not to stay overnight in RI or fly between airports until it blows over. I'm planning on emailing the following to some of the FBO's to give them some ammunition in getting it overturned. Other northeast pilots might want to do something similar. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------- Thank you for taking time to discuss the emergency tax regulation. I will be informing our 25 club members that flights to RI in club aircraft are prohibited until this matter is resolved. Although I understand that the provision only applies to overnight stopovers or flights between RI airports, I would not want a member faced with the choice between assuming an economic liability equal to 7% of the aircraft's cost and taking off in poor weather or with a mechanical problem. I also would not want their choice of an emergency diversion airport effected by knowledge of this provision. I am confident that this tax provision will eventually be overturned by the courts, even if common sense does not prevail. In the meantime, we would be required to carry any tax judgement as a liability on our books which would impair our ability to borrow money or sell the aircraft. We could also be exposed to legal costs defending against any action by the state to collect. I look forward to a successful resolution of this matter so that we, and other GA pilots, will again feel free to fly to RI and spend our dollars in your state. -- Roger Long |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I received the following response to an inquiry I made yesterday:
-----Original Message----- From: Paul McVay [mailto ![]() Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:37 AM To: me Subject: Use tax on non-commercial aircraft Mr. Foley: Non-residents are not subject to the 7% R.I. Use Tax. This regulation applies to persons or companies that may have some type of residency or business location in Rhode Island. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then they should have worded it to say exactly just that. As it's
currently worded, it says otherwise. Mr. Foley: Non-residents are not subject to the 7% R.I. Use Tax. This regulation applies to persons or companies that may have some type of residency or business location in Rhode Island. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Ebay Madness... | Richard Stewart | Military Aviation | 17 | February 9th 04 10:17 AM |
It's over was: RI tax madness | Roger Long | Owning | 18 | September 3rd 03 10:03 PM |
RI tax madness | Peter Gottlieb | Owning | 9 | August 29th 03 04:06 PM |
RI tax madness | Peter Gottlieb | Piloting | 6 | August 29th 03 04:06 PM |