![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR?
Source: ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 5, Issue 43 October 24, 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------- PRESIDENTIAL TFR FORECAST Be careful if you'll be flying in Texas next week. Except for a visit to Dallas next Wednesday, October 29, and a trip to San Antonio on Thursday, October 30, President Bush is expected to be at his ranch in Crawford from October 29 through November 3. This schedule is based on AOPA's best information at this time, and could change. Most temporary flight restrictions (TFRs) for presidential travel have been 60 nm in diameter; the vice president gets a smaller radius. Check AOPA Online ( http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/notams.html ) for the latest on these restrictions. Is the VP's TFR radius smaller because the intercepter aircraft employed in policing that TFR are faster? What prevents the presidential TFR from being smaller? Inquiring minds want to know the logic behind the difference in size between the presidential and vice presidential TFRs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? You're asking the people who set up TFRs to *reason*? George Patterson You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR?
He doesn't eat as much? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heheheh...he clearly eats *more*
"Teacherjh" wrote in message ... What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? He doesn't eat as much? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:26:58 -0500, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote in Message-Id: : Larry Dighera wrote: What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? You're asking the people who set up TFRs to *reason*? Well, I was hoping ... Is it presumptuous of me to expect the size of the vice/presidental TFRs to be based on intruder intercept response time? The difference in size between the two TFRs would seem to contradict that notion. This begs the question, upon what is the size of the TFRs based? Is it just arbitrary, or an absurd "mine is bigger than yours" thing? Perhaps this is a good question to pose to AOPA. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... Inquiring minds want to know the logic behind the difference in size between the presidential and vice presidential TFRs. Protocol. Presidents get bigger perqs than VP's. If Dick Cheney gets bumped off, the only thing that happens is W gets dumber. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:58:28 -0500, "Ron Natalie"
wrote in Message-Id: : "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... Inquiring minds want to know the logic behind the difference in size between the presidential and vice presidential TFRs. Protocol. Presidents get bigger perqs than VP's. The presidential TFRs are perquisites? Over 3,000 square miles of airspace is a large perq indeed. If the TFR size is not set because of rational criteria, it is unreasonable on face, IMNSHO. If Dick Cheney gets bumped off, the only thing that happens is W gets dumber. Thanks for the chuckle, but what happens if Jr is bumped off first? Does Cheney's TFR automatically expand? This is important stuff. We need answers. :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lets put this as it should be, Airspace is a volume. Presidential TFR is
about 13,000 cubic miles. (As if it has anything to do with it) Logic would say that VP is less important so less airspace. If shrub gets it, then Cheney is the Prez so he gets the 13K cubic miles. -- Kevin McCue KRYN '47 Luscombe 8E Rans S-17 (for sale) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera writes:
Is the VP's TFR radius smaller because the intercepter aircraft employed in policing that TFR are faster? What prevents the presidential TFR from being smaller? The radius is a function of the ego of the person being "protected." -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera writes:
Is it just arbitrary, or an absurd "mine is bigger than yours" thing? Unfortunately, a great deal of security for public personalities is indeed based on a "mine is bigger than yours" form of reasoning. This is especially true for _visible_ forms of security, such as the TFRs. Often the security isn't there to protect anyone, it's there to announce to everyone else how important a person is. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed developing smaller Stand-Off Weapons | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 1 | July 22nd 04 06:46 AM |
Are the Israelis using smaller Hellfire warheads? | Yeff | Military Aviation | 18 | April 22nd 04 10:07 PM |
Reasoning behind course reversal | Michael 182 | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 27th 04 03:27 PM |
Minimum bending radius for 0.050" 6061-T6? | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 11 | February 5th 04 04:59 PM |
FORMATIONS, BOMB RUNS AND RADIUS OF ACTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | August 10th 03 02:22 AM |