![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Gang
I am aware of 2 new (imported) gliders having to be registered in the experimental category - Mitch Polinsky's 31 and my DG1001M. I truly don't think that is too much of a problem with single place gliders but is a problem with 2 place gliders because it excludes commercial usage. Reasons given by the manufacturers were costs of certification. So my question is is this now accepted standard practice? For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 10, 2:07*pm, kd6veb wrote:
Hi Gang * I am aware of 2 new (imported) gliders having to be registered in the experimental category - *Mitch Polinsky's 31 and my DG1001M. I truly don't think that is too much of a problem with single place gliders but is a problem with 2 place gliders because it excludes commercial usage. Reasons given by the manufacturers were costs of certification. So my question is is this now accepted standard practice? * For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! Dave Most new gliders are registered as experimental not just 2. ASG-29 does not have type certificate and there are 40 of them in the USA. That is how my glider is registered as well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 10, 2013 2:07:55 PM UTC-4, kd6veb wrote:
For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! My principle credential for weighing in on this question is that I own a glider classified experimental with a VNE of 120 knots and I've given it some thought. The manufacturers of LSA are regulated more lightly than the makers of other aircraft. I'd guess that at some point in history, experience told the regulators that the incidence of problems (like flutter) increased rapidly above 120 knots. Thus it would be reasonable to more lightly regulate the manufacturers of aircraft that had a VNE less than 120 knots. Now that manufacturing technology has changed (and not necessarily for the better), the 120 knot may be too high or too low. Once upon a time, 120 knots made sense. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 10, 2013 2:07:55 PM UTC-4, kd6veb wrote:
Hi Gang I am aware of 2 new (imported) gliders having to be registered in the experimental category - Mitch Polinsky's 31 and my DG1001M. I truly don't think that is too much of a problem with single place gliders but is a problem with 2 place gliders because it excludes commercial usage. Reasons given by the manufacturers were costs of certification. So my question is is this now accepted standard practice? For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! Dave I believe registration is the same. The airworthiness certificate is where the difference lies. I would be curious as to what benefit you see in SLSA. IIRC the 120 kts is consistent with powered aircraft licensed in the same catagory. The theory the FAA was working under was that these are simpler, lighter, and most likely slower to match up with a different need than aircraft certified through the normal process. Experimental works just fine for everything but 2 seaters used for hire. Those ships are all certified in EASA land so there is no big reason the couldn't be here. DG certainly could do it if they haven't. FWIW UH |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many imports have an FAA issued Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) that will specify how the glider may be registered.
I believe the ASG-29 is a derivative of the -27 and would be listed under that TCDS. Bill T |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 10, 10:03*pm, Bill T wrote:
Many imports have an FAA issued Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) that will specify how the glider may be registered. I believe the ASG-29 is a derivative of the -27 and would be listed under that TCDS. Bill T In 2010 I asked that question the answer was "No". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:07:55 AM UTC-7, kd6veb wrote:
Hi Gang I am aware of 2 new (imported) gliders having to be registered in the experimental category - Mitch Polinsky's 31 and my DG1001M. I truly don't think that is too much of a problem with single place gliders but is a problem with 2 place gliders because it excludes commercial usage. Reasons given by the manufacturers were costs of certification. So my question is is this now accepted standard practice? For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! Dave Most all sailplanes that are in the experimental category are certified "air racing", the meat of the meal is in the limitations issued at the time of the certification. If the DAR is nice he will give you in the limitations an operating area of the continental United States. If he does not do this he will give you a practice area, usually a 300 mile radius from your home base then you will have to submit a Program letter each year. You send a Program Letter to your local FSDO informing them of where you plan to "race" this year and must be submitted every year, you can also just fax the FSDO any time of your intentions and do not need a reply from the FSDO. Of course some of us forget about all this and fly where ever and when ever we want, the sailplane knows no difference. If you have an sailplane in the Experimental category of "air racing" your limitations need to be with the Pink Ticket otherwise the airworthiness is invalid and you need to know what your limitations say. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:07:55 AM UTC-7, kd6veb wrote: Hi Gang I am aware of 2 new (imported) gliders having to be registered in the experimental category - Mitch Polinsky's 31 and my DG1001M. I truly don't think that is too much of a problem with single place gliders but is a problem with 2 place gliders because it excludes commercial usage. Reasons given by the manufacturers were costs of certification. So my question is is this now accepted standard practice? For lighter gliders up to 1320lbs max weight we have a very viable option in the US and that is SLSA category. My Phoenix in in this category. As far as I understand it there are no real negatives but one perceived negative and that is the max VNE has to be 120 knots. Why? Only the FAA with its infinite wisdom knows why! Dave Most all sailplanes that are in the experimental category are certified "air racing", the meat of the meal is in the limitations issued at the time of the certification. If the DAR is nice he will give you in the limitations an operating area of the continental United States. If he does not do this he will give you a practice area, usually a 300 mile radius from your home base then you will have to submit a Program letter each year. You send a Program Letter to your local FSDO informing them of where you plan to "race" this year and must be submitted every year, you can also just fax the FSDO any time of your intentions and do not need a reply from the FSDO. Of course some of us forget about all this and fly where ever and when ever we want, the sailplane knows no difference. If you have an sailplane in the Experimental category of "air racing" your limitations need to be with the Pink Ticket otherwise the airworthiness is invalid and you need to know what your limitations say. Pardon my ignorance here. If these gliders have an EASA TCDS, shouldn't they then also be type certified in the US through reciprocity? I thought that EASA and FAA Type Certificates were more or less equivalent? Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:21:42 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Most all sailplanes that are in the experimental category are certified "air racing", the meat of the meal is in the limitations issued at the time of the certification. If the DAR is nice he will give you in the limitations an operating area of the continental United States. If he does not do this he will give you a practice area, usually a 300 mile radius from your home base then you will have to submit a Program letter each year. I would add that I can legally fly my experimental glider in badge attempts and practice for badge attempts. Racing and race practice are allowed, but they are not required. It is also possible to change the center of my 300 mile radius, but to do so the FAA wants to come to my airport and reinspect the glider based on current regulations. Due to budget cutbacks, the FAA guy could not get travel money this year, so we settled on a Program Letter that bases the glider at my local airport, 700 miles from the former owner's base of operations. I will try to do an identical Program Letter in 2014. That way I can avoid the possible repercussions of an overly zealous FAA inspection. It's good to know this because the FAA guy did not know about the Practice for Badge Attempts loophole. I found that myself by reading the documents carefully. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Here in NZ I had to go through type acceptance before the old LBA TC for Nimbus 3D I imported was accepted. At least here it wasn't too much of a drama |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Janus 2-seat glider as a club glider? | K_Miller | Soaring | 35 | February 3rd 13 10:43 PM |
Glider Presentations to Non-Glider Pilots? | JohnDeRosa | Soaring | 12 | January 17th 13 07:03 AM |
Exporting a glider to/import a glider into Germany | Pete Smith[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | August 8th 08 09:33 AM |
Glider Model - Blaue Maus- 1922 Wasserkuppe Glider | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 19th 06 11:08 PM |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |