![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, I passed the ride two weeks ago, with about 45 hours simulated
instrument time and a precious 2.5 hours actual. I flew a couple practice ILS's two days ago, after an "off-period" of less than two weeks and already felt a bit rusty, though they went Ok (2nd definitely better than the first). Oh, it was also an unfamiliar airplane, and I was in the right seat, which I'd only done a handful of times before. Anyway, the question I find floating around my head a lot now is just how much instrument flying, sim or actual, do I need to do to stay current? Of course I'm not talking about what the regs say - I know what they say and I know that 6 approaches every 6 months is not likely to keep me at a level of currency that I'm comfortable with. I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Folbrecht" wrote: What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? I have to practice at least once a month if I don't get any actual "naturally." If the weather is down on the weekend, I usually take the opportunity to fly approaches to the local airports for practice. If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? Yes. As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? Less than it did it first (5+ years ago) because I've become quite comfortable with working the ATC IFR system. My scan and attitude instrument flying skills still require pretty regular work, though. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Folbrecht wrote:
I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? I don't get as much actual, or stick time in general, as I'd like to (especially in the winter). Realisticly, if I don't devote one flight a month to hard-core instrument work (i.e 2-3 hours under the hood with 4 or more approaches), I'm not keeping sharp enough. That's about 4x the legal minimum. I also try to set off on longish trips sometimes, so I'm not just flying the same approaches over and over. I try to mix things up. One flight might be "VOR night", where I turn off the GPS and fly everything with just 2 nav radios. My most recent flight was devoted to exploring the new software upgrade we just got in the GPS (LNAV/VNAV approaches, for example). I like to have my safety pilot throw stuff at me (like inventing random holds). Train to a higher standard than real life, so real life seems simple by comparison. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:18:02 GMT, Paul Folbrecht wrote:
Hi Paul, I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? You will probably get answers all over the page, so responses will be interesting! For me, if I dont' fly AT LEAST once every two weeks, I feel rusty on approaches. Looking at my logbook, this year, I have flown 5 flights in actual conditions. 4 of the flights were local IFR to keep the rust off, and one was a cross country IFR trip. regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? YES, but not necessarily with a safety pilot so to speak. I know I will maintain currency based on the regs, but I will fly practice ILS approaches fully VFR in Class C airspace with NO hood. I figure that tracking the localizer and glide slope VFR will keep me in tune with the airplane so when IFR conditions come about, only difference would be that I can't see outside. Something would be better then nothing... Since my own airport is uncontrolled, I would never do this without a safety pilot since my head needs to be on a swivel OUTSIDE the cockpit under VFR / MVFR conditions. overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? For me, no, I need to keep practicing. and practicing. As you already know, every approach is different with weather / winds the way it is. In some ways, I wish I was based at an airport with an ILS, as I would love to work my way downt to ILS minimums, but I only have a VOR alpa approach back to my airport, so my personal minimums are 1000 foot ceilings. (100 feet above MDA). Allen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Folbrecht wrote:
So, I passed the ride two weeks ago, with about 45 hours simulated instrument time and a precious 2.5 hours actual. I flew a couple practice ILS's two days ago, after an "off-period" of less than two weeks and already felt a bit rusty, though they went Ok (2nd definitely better than the first). Oh, it was also an unfamiliar airplane, and I was in the right seat, which I'd only done a handful of times before. Anyway, the question I find floating around my head a lot now is just how much instrument flying, sim or actual, do I need to do to stay current? Of course I'm not talking about what the regs say - I know what they say and I know that 6 approaches every 6 months is not likely to keep me at a level of currency that I'm comfortable with. I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? I found that as I gained experience, I found it easier to stay current and took less effort. After taking a 4 year hiatus and returning just recently to flying, I'm feeling again like you are now. A month or two between approaches makes a lot of difference. When I was flying 100 hours a year, I could take a two month break and hardly notice it. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A related question: When can you log an approach for purposes of currency? Obviously if you fly an approach in IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you fly it in VFR conditions all the way you can't. But where do you draw the line? If it's VFR the whole way except for flying through one cloud for a second or two after the IAF, is that a loggable approach? rg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Folbrecht" wrote in message ... I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? It's not too much of a problem out here during winter but I do practice during the summer with a fully rigged FlyElite simulator. Winter, though, is the slow season for my business. As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? Just a bit, but the lags must be consistent without to long of a gap. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Paul Folbrecht" wrote in message ... I'm looking for input from you guys that have had your rating for awhile and who do stay current and fly in IMC regularly. What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? It's not too much of a problem out here during winter but I do practice during the summer with a fully rigged FlyElite simulator. Winter, though, is the slow season for my business. As your overall time increases, does it take somewhat less flying to maintain that same level of comfortable currency? Just a bit, but the lags must be consistent without to long of a gap. I might add that 95% of all my flight plans are IFR regardless of weather or altitude. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... I found that as I gained experience, I found it easier to stay current and took less effort. After taking a 4 year hiatus and returning just recently to flying, I'm feeling again like you are now. A month or two between approaches makes a lot of difference. When I was flying 100 hours a year, I could take a two month break and hardly notice it. Damn!! I flew nearly 400 hours last year and find I get rusty if there's a long period without AMC thrown in. And As I mentioned, nearly all my flight plans are IFR. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Folbrecht" wrote in message
... What does it take, realistically, for you to feel proficient and safe flying and shooting approaches in actual? If you don't get actual time, do you still regularly practice approaches simulated with a safety pilot? I dislike flying under the hood--I don't find it to be very helpful. Instead, I use my PC flight simulator at home to maintain proficiency. Even though it doesn't count toward official currency, I find it much more useful than "approved flight training devices", which do count officially (with CFI supervision). For official currency, I fly approaches in IMC. I don't get many of those in the course of XC flying, so at least four times a year I try to go shoot a few approaches on a good LIFR day. Between that, and the PC simulator, and XC IMC flying (usually just with visual approaches), and filing IFR in VMC to stay familiar with the ATC interaction, I manage to maintain both official currency and actual proficiency. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |