![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen some GPS Notams about likely unreliability in certain
areas over certain very narrowly-defined periods of time. Can anyone tell me what sort of known activities create these conditions? -Robert Scott Ypsilanti, Michigan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Periodic uploads of ephemeris and clock data to the SV, testing,
maintenance, switching of clocks, etc. from Master Control at Schriever Air Force Base. J. Severyn KLVK "Robert Scott" wrote in message ... I have seen some GPS Notams about likely unreliability in certain areas over certain very narrowly-defined periods of time. Can anyone tell me what sort of known activities create these conditions? -Robert Scott Ypsilanti, Michigan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. Severyn" wrote in
: Periodic uploads of ephemeris and clock data to the SV, testing, maintenance, switching of clocks, etc. from Master Control at Schriever Air Force Base. And tests of jamming equipment. The only way to be sure whether a system can be jammed is by jamming it. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert,
tests and/or usage of ground-based jamming equipment. As the people at Schriever AFB have explained to me, uploads of data (each satellite has to be "touched" by the ground station at least once per day - talk about maintenance intensive) do NOT disrupt service. Also, it is not really possible to deny service to well defined geographic areas by switching off satellites. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.,
Periodic uploads of ephemeris and clock data to the SV, testing, maintenance, switching of clocks, etc. from Master Control at Schriever Air Force Base. Hmm. What, if I may ask, is your source for that? The people at Schriever told me specifically these kinds of things will not disrupt service. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get current status he
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/gpsnotices/ "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... J., Periodic uploads of ephemeris and clock data to the SV, testing, maintenance, switching of clocks, etc. from Master Control at Schriever Air Force Base. Hmm. What, if I may ask, is your source for that? The people at Schriever told me specifically these kinds of things will not disrupt service. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a good question.
How can they tell a area will have a GPS problem for a short amount of time?? If it is interference, it should be eliminated. Makes you wonder about the stupid plan by the FAA to shut off VOR and DME's around the country. That would be very DUMB. I have also noticed more and more VOR's, NDB's, ILS's and DME's broke and not in service around the country on the NOTAM database. Scary. Looks like the FAA can't keep their stuff running huh?? Robert Scott wrote: I have seen some GPS Notams about likely unreliability in certain areas over certain very narrowly-defined periods of time. Can anyone tell me what sort of known activities create these conditions? -Robert Scott Ypsilanti, Michigan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SolarSapien wrote in news:nt9ke.11440$8S5.6401
@bignews3.bellsouth.net: Looks like the FAA can't keep their stuff running huh?? GPS does not belong to the FAA, and they don't run it. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was speaking of DME's, VOR's, ILS's, NDB's etc.
FAA does run the WAAS network however Stan Gosnell wrote: SolarSapien wrote in news:nt9ke.11440$8S5.6401 @bignews3.bellsouth.net: Looks like the FAA can't keep their stuff running huh?? GPS does not belong to the FAA, and they don't run it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Borchert wrote: Robert, tests and/or usage of ground-based jamming equipment. As the people at Schriever AFB have explained to me, uploads of data (each satellite has to be "touched" by the ground station at least once per day - talk about maintenance intensive) do NOT disrupt service. Also, it is not really possible to deny service to well defined geographic areas by switching off satellites. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) I guess whether or not a disruption may occur would depend upon what the definition of 'service' is. If it includes the 'availability of integrity to conduct an approach' then: There are cases where a satellite taken OTS, can affect availability of integrity using standalone GPS (RAIM) as well as cases where availability of integrity using WAAS is not guaranteed. As 'GPS' is sometimes used as an umbrella term, it wasn't clear from the original post whether the NOTAMs referred to, were GPS NOTAMs or perhaps WAAS NOTAMs as the latter can contain the UNREL contraction. Regards, Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jepp no longer in the GA business...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | June 17th 04 10:49 PM |
Carefull of NOTAMS on NavCanada website | Ross Magnaldo | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 10th 03 11:46 PM |
NOTAMs for non-US space launches? | Allen Thomson | Military Aviation | 0 | September 25th 03 04:01 PM |